Commenting Preference:
The author encourages honest critique.
Re: The Question
25th Sep 2012 11:52pm
re: Re: The Question
26th Sep 2012 00:22am
And it doesn't take much to see who we are....Enter the Christmas party! Thanks for pitching in, Drivelicious.
Re: The Question
27th Sep 2012 4:09am
Ah well: they have it, they flaunt it. People like moi, what is there to show....love my mind and my brains...(not much but they are there) haha! Cheesh, this is sad.
0
re: Re: The Question
27th Sep 2012 4:15am
It's sad, but nevertheless guys will fall all over themselves for a girl they find outwardly attractive and for what? To get something for their time? Is that not prostitution? Who is the whore?
re: re: Re: The Question
Pretty covers sell. As for prostitution (of body, mind, heart, or substance etc) its Supply and demand, my dear...always there. Sometimes its for money, sometimes for honey...but always there will be heartbreaks/headaches.
0
re: re: re: Re: The Question
27th Sep 2012 10:59am
The way I look at it is that no matter what we do, someone somewhere will say we are selling out. I write here for free, and yet we are talking, you and I and so we have social interaction and that is a part of the payback. I talk and others listen. I am a whore for social intercourse. That is a good line...need to write about that!
Re. The Question
10th Jan 2017 3:57am
Re: Re. The Question
Things don't always need to be nice. Our society presents this kind of twisted conversation all the time. We ride the fence between utility and inspiration. Is a person a tool? Is there some skill needed to work through human complexes?
For me, walking right up to the question and looking it in the eye is more useful and allows the muse to shine through.
Do we define others by their appearance? Can we actually change our identity with a change of clothes?
Can we judge others without also judging ourselves? Doesn't the speaker here do himself a violence here? In order to give himself permission to ask her out, first he has to criticize her. Who is the weaker, more exposed, less protected, more vulnerable person here?
We get so caught up in the trash talk by him that we forget to see her strength in her ability to wear what she wants without fear of condemnation by the likes of him.
For me, walking right up to the question and looking it in the eye is more useful and allows the muse to shine through.
Do we define others by their appearance? Can we actually change our identity with a change of clothes?
Can we judge others without also judging ourselves? Doesn't the speaker here do himself a violence here? In order to give himself permission to ask her out, first he has to criticize her. Who is the weaker, more exposed, less protected, more vulnerable person here?
We get so caught up in the trash talk by him that we forget to see her strength in her ability to wear what she wants without fear of condemnation by the likes of him.