deepundergroundpoetry.com

What's Wrong with Lust?

There are at least four major things that are wrong about lust, or sexually immoral behavior, from a purely observatory stand point.  Secrecy, conceit, betrayal, and deception are at least four things wrong.  Secrecy is flat out dishonest, assumed to be hidden, and double-standardized.  In contrast of context, and construity of situational and circumstantial consequence, such things are assumed to be unseen.  Conceit is being too full of yourself, based on arrogance, haughtiness, and pride.  This is far from honesty and truth.  Betrayal involves annexing trust, and doing away with any potential merit to your word.  Often times, a person thinks they're better than someone when they stab them in the back.  Deception is the elaboration of the scheme, or the process of the role in sexually immoral behavior.  It's the "playwrite" that is assumed to be a witticism or accreditation to one's personality.  You can forgive a secret, conceited, betraying liar, but you don't have to trust them, nor be around them.  Why should you have to "outsmart" someone to have sex with you?  What good is it, really?
 
Allow me to be satirical for this paragraph, as an attempt to be logical, in the motive and intent of a sexually immoral person.  So basically, life isn't fair, you're #1, it's all about survival of the fittest, right?  All about the alpha and beta?  That means you have to outsmart a woman or man to "fall in love" with you?  Numb, ignorant, emotional reciprocity, to cover up subconscius, subliminal shame is quid pro quo?  Pesteringly joking about sex between people is inspiring and creative?  How is it innocent joking if you have to read between the lines?  It's really funny, especially when it's sexually hoggish, but not a direct allusion?  Dual meaning metaphor that has more than one allusion is passable to hide the real motive and intent?  What is anything that has no meaning, but is out of control, in terms of feeling true emotion?  Perhaps irresponsible?  Maybe "friends" engage in that towards eachother, because they feel they're the "mastermind" behind the controls of "ego" and "libido?"  Tall tales, exaggeration, and gossip are somehow "witty", particularly in a sex pun?  There isn't another means and motivation to be more creative in your communication, but to hide behind weasel worded innuendos and codes?
 
Any justification of that behavior is antisocial, at it's very core.  The general concensus is that it's primal, and necessary, as a function of libido.  There is also an underlying, conscientious adaptation to these situations - even in children!  This is inherently obvious in a person who watches someone "assume" such a role as seduction, or even worse, anything further than that.  Fundamentally, sexually immoral behavior does not involve sacrifice in working together towards the goal of unity, peace, and resolution.  It's a lying hypocrisy that people point out in eachother to exchange roles of innane dispostion.  Entirely immatue, and shouldn't be considered "adult" anything!  It's drama, rather than peace, get, rather than give.  It's selfishly manipulative, and notoriously ugly in confrontation or potential conflict.
 
Whatever happened to the common understanding that Public Displays of Affection aren't appropriate?  No right husband or wife would engage in any such behavior in public, or in front of others.  It is simply awkward and inappropriate.  Seduction shouldn't be in any environment involving more people than a married couple, perhaps in such a subjection.  Seduction shouldn't be enabled or condoned.  It's shameful.  Many of the world's authorities would have you believe you're beastial and barbaric, with primitive needs, so that they can make a circus out of you.  This is the case, if you're into promiscuous, sexual acts, in this age.
 
We live in a great age of confusion, where everyone needs their sex fix.  It's sold everywhere on the internet and television.  It's being taught to our children in our schools.  It's what groups of kids and adults alike talk about the most.  Many "professionals" believe it's a profound disposition of existence, or potential spirituality, even!  Immoral sex is not the pinnacle purpose of humanity!  It's not the solution to sell to the next generation.  Tradition is going down the tubes, because mankind cannot admit fault.  To not be in control, and blame someone else, like any other area in life, is a pathetic cop out.  You can't hold onto delusion and fantasy as a means to believe you're always "right," especially in something so preserved and precious in the intent of marriage.  In such a thing, to see self in that light would make one want to change!
Written by Connotation
Published | Edited 4th Aug 2023
Author's Note
I don't intend offense.  This is merely a hypothetical disposition, and an experiment of awareness. I suppose the word "lust" can pertain to covetousness or intense want and other sorts of sin, but in the context given in this body of work, this is mostly how the world sees such a word.
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 0 reading list entries 0
comments 0 reads 227
Commenting Preference: 
The author is looking for friendly feedback.

Latest Forum Discussions
POETRY
Today 1:04pm by Ahavati
SPEAKEASY
Today 12:34pm by ajay
SPEAKEASY
Today 12:03pm by Ahavati
SPEAKEASY
Today 11:25am by Ahavati
SPEAKEASY
Today 11:18am by Ahavati
SPEAKEASY
Today 11:02am by Ahavati