Freedom of Speech and Censorship
Anonymous
Ahavati said:
It already is!
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=helicockter
LMAO!
That place reminds me of a fake Wikipedia site that existed around 2008.
It already is!
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=helicockter
LMAO!
That place reminds me of a fake Wikipedia site that existed around 2008.
WHOA! Bout damn time!!
SUPREME COURT
In landmark case, Supreme Court rules LGBTQ workers are protected from job discrimination
The decision said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that existing federal law forbids job discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status, a major victory for advocates of gay rights and for the nascent transgender rights movement — and a surprising one from an increasingly conservative court.
By a vote of 6-3, the court said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, among other factors, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status. It upheld rulings from lower courts that said sexual orientation discrimination was a form of sex discrimination.
Equally surprising was that the decision was written by President Donald Trump's first Supreme Court appointee, Neil Gorsuch, who was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court's four more liberal members to form a majority.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-existing-civil-rights-law-protects-gay-lesbian-n1231018?fbclid=IwAR0nCCBSEK0GK61NVCeoF5MuCTORTERuHjuapPwZ-dQXtcIfecy9veWUMK0
Yet ANOTHER positive change for America! CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR VICTORY, LGBTQ INDIVIDUALS! It's most deserving and long overdue.
SUPREME COURT
In landmark case, Supreme Court rules LGBTQ workers are protected from job discrimination
The decision said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that existing federal law forbids job discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status, a major victory for advocates of gay rights and for the nascent transgender rights movement — and a surprising one from an increasingly conservative court.
By a vote of 6-3, the court said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, among other factors, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status. It upheld rulings from lower courts that said sexual orientation discrimination was a form of sex discrimination.
Equally surprising was that the decision was written by President Donald Trump's first Supreme Court appointee, Neil Gorsuch, who was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court's four more liberal members to form a majority.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-existing-civil-rights-law-protects-gay-lesbian-n1231018?fbclid=IwAR0nCCBSEK0GK61NVCeoF5MuCTORTERuHjuapPwZ-dQXtcIfecy9veWUMK0
Yet ANOTHER positive change for America! CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR VICTORY, LGBTQ INDIVIDUALS! It's most deserving and long overdue.
Anonymous
Ahavati said:WHOA! Bout damn time!!
SUPREME COURT
In landmark case, Supreme Court rules LGBTQ workers are protected from job discrimination
The decision said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that existing federal law forbids job discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status, a major victory for advocates of gay rights and for the nascent transgender rights movement — and a surprising one from an increasingly conservative court.
By a vote of 6-3, the court said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, among other factors, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status. It upheld rulings from lower courts that said sexual orientation discrimination was a form of sex discrimination.
Equally surprising was that the decision was written by President Donald Trump's first Supreme Court appointee, Neil Gorsuch, who was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court's four more liberal members to form a majority.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-existing-civil-rights-law-protects-gay-lesbian-n1231018?fbclid=IwAR0nCCBSEK0GK61NVCeoF5MuCTORTERuHjuapPwZ-dQXtcIfecy9veWUMK0
Yet ANOTHER positive change for America!
Gay and transgender rights groups considered the case a highly significant one, even more important than the fight to get the right to marry, because nearly every LGBTQ adult has or needs a job. They conceded that sexual orientation was not on the minds of anyone in Congress when the civil rights law was passed. But they said when an employer fires a male employee for dating men, but not a female employee who dates men, that violates the law.
I must be living in a cave because I honestly didn't think anything like that was even possible. How could an employer justify something like that? Mind blown for the day.
SUPREME COURT
In landmark case, Supreme Court rules LGBTQ workers are protected from job discrimination
The decision said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that existing federal law forbids job discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status, a major victory for advocates of gay rights and for the nascent transgender rights movement — and a surprising one from an increasingly conservative court.
By a vote of 6-3, the court said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, among other factors, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status. It upheld rulings from lower courts that said sexual orientation discrimination was a form of sex discrimination.
Equally surprising was that the decision was written by President Donald Trump's first Supreme Court appointee, Neil Gorsuch, who was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court's four more liberal members to form a majority.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-existing-civil-rights-law-protects-gay-lesbian-n1231018?fbclid=IwAR0nCCBSEK0GK61NVCeoF5MuCTORTERuHjuapPwZ-dQXtcIfecy9veWUMK0
Yet ANOTHER positive change for America!
Gay and transgender rights groups considered the case a highly significant one, even more important than the fight to get the right to marry, because nearly every LGBTQ adult has or needs a job. They conceded that sexual orientation was not on the minds of anyone in Congress when the civil rights law was passed. But they said when an employer fires a male employee for dating men, but not a female employee who dates men, that violates the law.
I must be living in a cave because I honestly didn't think anything like that was even possible. How could an employer justify something like that? Mind blown for the day.
JohnnyBlaze said:
If you are referring to Cap Free Zone in Seattle...?
Despite the few days of its official police station being shut down, the Zone is still being policed from an outside location. Not as efficiently, which is a matter being brought up in negotiations.
Again, it's only been a few days.
The zone is not BLM
Not cool by any group but themselves.
Also solid black avatars are disapproved of by your black leadership.
If you are referring to Cap Free Zone in Seattle...?
Despite the few days of its official police station being shut down, the Zone is still being policed from an outside location. Not as efficiently, which is a matter being brought up in negotiations.
Again, it's only been a few days.
The zone is not BLM
Not cool by any group but themselves.
Also solid black avatars are disapproved of by your black leadership.
Anonymous
EdibleWords said:
The zone is not BLM
Not cool by any group but themselves.
I never mentioned who was occupying or not occupying Free Cap.
I only cleared up the misconception that it was not being policed.
Please direct your complaints to ... them ... whoever they are .....
EdibleWords said:Also solid black avatars are disapproved of by your black leadership.
According to you, there is no "black" leadership.
Or, YOU are the "black" leadership around here.
It all depends on what day it is or when you get your stories straight.
And I don't have a solid black avatar, so ... I don't really care.
The zone is not BLM
Not cool by any group but themselves.
I never mentioned who was occupying or not occupying Free Cap.
I only cleared up the misconception that it was not being policed.
Please direct your complaints to ... them ... whoever they are .....
EdibleWords said:Also solid black avatars are disapproved of by your black leadership.
According to you, there is no "black" leadership.
Or, YOU are the "black" leadership around here.
It all depends on what day it is or when you get your stories straight.
And I don't have a solid black avatar, so ... I don't really care.
JohnnyBlaze said:
According to you, there is no "black" leadership.
Wrong; see my avatar. Plus #blacklivesmatter has black leadership. Hello?
Or, YOU are the "black" leadership around here.
Nothing that glamorous...
Just a black star....
It all depends on what day it is or when you get your stories straight.
Oh, boy!
Did I do it?
And I don't have a solid black avatar, so ... I don't really care.
your better half.... gosh... I mix you up all the time. Just consider it a compliment.
Again, is KKK infiltrating the movement; yes... or no?
According to you, there is no "black" leadership.
Wrong; see my avatar. Plus #blacklivesmatter has black leadership. Hello?
Or, YOU are the "black" leadership around here.
Nothing that glamorous...
Just a black star....
It all depends on what day it is or when you get your stories straight.
Oh, boy!
Did I do it?
And I don't have a solid black avatar, so ... I don't really care.
your better half.... gosh... I mix you up all the time. Just consider it a compliment. Again, is KKK infiltrating the movement; yes... or no?
The General is a Mom of Ten - The War Against the Divide
Call me a terrorist
against the KKK
Because terror is
in their hearts today
If I get my way
they will be forced
to publicly say
“I am black”
- to save business
- money
- their presidential
candidacy
Call me a terrorist
against the KKK
Because terror is
in their hearts today
If I get my way
they will be forced
to publicly say
“I am black”
- to save business
- money
- their presidential
candidacy
Anonymous
EdibleWords said:Again, is KKK infiltrating the movement; yes... or no?
We already have a racist president in the White House, so .... anything is possible, I guess.
I really don't have the energy to overly concern myself with people ELSEWHERE trying to give #BlackLivesMatter a bad reputation. It's time consuming enough HERE.
We already have a racist president in the White House, so .... anything is possible, I guess.
I really don't have the energy to overly concern myself with people ELSEWHERE trying to give #BlackLivesMatter a bad reputation. It's time consuming enough HERE.
EdibleWords said:
Is that a threat?
Am I blowing some racist’s cover, already?
✊🏿😎
Not at all...
You are just being scientifically ignorant...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_star_(semiclassical_gravity)
Is that a threat?
Am I blowing some racist’s cover, already?
✊🏿😎
Not at all...
You are just being scientifically ignorant...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_star_(semiclassical_gravity)
Barbra Streisand gifts George Floyd’s daughter Disney stock
https://www.revolt.tv/2020/6/15/21291758/george-floyd-daughter-disney-stockholder
https://www.revolt.tv/2020/6/15/21291758/george-floyd-daughter-disney-stockholder
Anonymous
Ahavati said:Barbra Streisand gifts George Floyd’s daughter Disney stock
https://www.revolt.tv/2020/6/15/21291758/george-floyd-daughter-disney-stockholder
That is a wonderfully thoughtful gift for a child who just lost her father.
The financial strain on these families that lose loved ones is rarely ever discussed.
https://www.revolt.tv/2020/6/15/21291758/george-floyd-daughter-disney-stockholder
That is a wonderfully thoughtful gift for a child who just lost her father.
The financial strain on these families that lose loved ones is rarely ever discussed.
