deepundergroundpoetry.com
Finally
When I was a child, I remember
I wanted to live in another time,
many years ago on horseback. Sword
laying at my hip like a third arm,
sun telling me when to gather wood.
I would have rode, hunted and I
would have killed. Gloriously. Oh
I would have killed; darting through flesh
totally unscathed, with a shield
decorated to symbolise me, unruled
but when I was a child, there'd be
some girl. Sometimes any girl
with vague features and long hair;
helpless, always helpless, in straits
and I would breeze with a steel arm
through the veins of every threat.
I wake at night sometimes
to the cry of a defenseless baby exposed
to the dark and all its unseen terrors.
I cruise through its unimaginables.
Now I am a man, I am somebody's hero.
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 9
reading list entries 0
comments 13
reads 696
Commenting Preference:
The author encourages honest critique.
Re: Finally
Anonymous
21st Dec 2012 8:39pm
What I like about this is the lyrical conflict between man at his most primal and man with his emotion. A very clear reflection of two worlds intertwining.
0
re: Re: Finally
21st Dec 2012 10:08pm
Cheers, Miss. I wondered if it would be seen as a simple reflection, or if could be read at the different levels so I'm happy with your comment.
Re: Finally
21st Dec 2012 10:08pm
Deft setting of time and place with so few words:
"Sword
laying at my hip like a third arm,
sun telling me when to gather wood."
The language fits the era described, too. A good construction.
Attention to the following:
"I would of rode, hunted and I
would of killed. Gloriously. Oh
I would of killed"
all the "I would of" should be "I would have" or "I would've".
"Sword
laying at my hip like a third arm,
sun telling me when to gather wood."
The language fits the era described, too. A good construction.
Attention to the following:
"I would of rode, hunted and I
would of killed. Gloriously. Oh
I would of killed"
all the "I would of" should be "I would have" or "I would've".
0
re: Re: Finally
21st Dec 2012 10:14pm
I do that more and more frequently. Cheers for pointing that out, Atakti, and thanks for the praise.
Have
Have
Have. Think I've got it? :)
Have
Have
Have. Think I've got it? :)
Re: Finally
Mr A,
deffinately like the poem and t5he tale it tells, the circle it travells and the images it conjures.
where I might have some small issues is in the first stanza;
When I was a child, I remember
(this may be a grammatical error, I'm not sure but it made me stop either way, if you had it the other way around itmight sort that out ..or I could be just being a nazi)
edit; ok so I get it now, it's the line break that's putting it off a bit
when I was a child
I remember that ..
another edit: no, it still sounds wrong for some reason, sorry 'bout this Mr A, I'm trying to be helpul but I've gone confused myself.
I wanted to live in another time,
many years ago on horseback.
(see, it's kind of implying that you wanted to live on horseback , perhaps another line or two might sort that for you,it'd be no harm to stretch it a little anyway because it's a decent enough image)
the second might need another look at,in the first two lines, the puncuation;
I'd have rode through woods
and I'd have hunted, killed gloriously.
(I like the sound of the two H's together what do you think? )
Oh! I'd have killed;
darting through flesh totally unscathed
with a shield
decorated to symbolise me
unruled
all just suggestions Mr A.
liked it a lot
deffinately like the poem and t5he tale it tells, the circle it travells and the images it conjures.
where I might have some small issues is in the first stanza;
When I was a child, I remember
(this may be a grammatical error, I'm not sure but it made me stop either way, if you had it the other way around itmight sort that out ..or I could be just being a nazi)
edit; ok so I get it now, it's the line break that's putting it off a bit
when I was a child
I remember that ..
another edit: no, it still sounds wrong for some reason, sorry 'bout this Mr A, I'm trying to be helpul but I've gone confused myself.
I wanted to live in another time,
many years ago on horseback.
(see, it's kind of implying that you wanted to live on horseback , perhaps another line or two might sort that for you,it'd be no harm to stretch it a little anyway because it's a decent enough image)
the second might need another look at,in the first two lines, the puncuation;
I'd have rode through woods
and I'd have hunted, killed gloriously.
(I like the sound of the two H's together what do you think? )
Oh! I'd have killed;
darting through flesh totally unscathed
with a shield
decorated to symbolise me
unruled
all just suggestions Mr A.
liked it a lot
0
re: Re: Finally
21st Dec 2012 10:39pm
Ok, the first line is more a figure of speech. When someone looks back and just starts talking. That's why the comma's there; to keep the grammar. If you said "When I'd got to the shop, I'd forgotten" you wouldn't notice it because it's more common.(just saw your edit. never mind:)
I think it's how the reader wants to read that bit. I think unless they think I wanted to be a horse's flea, I should be safe.
You'll notice the full stops, then "Gloriously" stopping again. This was to add emphasis and hold you on this word for a second, without the use of a line-break. Make sense?
It is heavily punctuated, partly to keep the form(as you see the first two verses are almost identical) and partly because it's the most important thing to read, especially when read aloud. I left words hanging that might look awkward but add a good rhythm when read aloud.
However, your critique was spot on. I was going to write this without punctuation and a more free form, if I did, I would of definitely taken your advice. Cheers for the praise too, Eamon. Really appreciate it.
I think it's how the reader wants to read that bit. I think unless they think I wanted to be a horse's flea, I should be safe.
You'll notice the full stops, then "Gloriously" stopping again. This was to add emphasis and hold you on this word for a second, without the use of a line-break. Make sense?
It is heavily punctuated, partly to keep the form(as you see the first two verses are almost identical) and partly because it's the most important thing to read, especially when read aloud. I left words hanging that might look awkward but add a good rhythm when read aloud.
However, your critique was spot on. I was going to write this without punctuation and a more free form, if I did, I would of definitely taken your advice. Cheers for the praise too, Eamon. Really appreciate it.
Re: Finally
22nd Dec 2012 00:22am
re: Re: Finally
22nd Dec 2012 8:52am
Re: Finally
you can say I would've, if you don't mind the contractions. same sound, correct meaning, acceptable punctuation.
0
re: Re: Finally
25th Dec 2012 1:36pm
re: re: Re: Finally
29th Dec 2012 2:49am
Re: Finally
23rd Dec 2012 8:09am
re: Re: Finally
25th Dec 2012 1:37pm