WHY DO I WRITE ?

Another preachy piece that is full of cliches, repetitious expressions,  and grammar gaffes.  Consider your "This is what everyman clearly sight".   Everyman is singular.  Therefore the verb "sight" must  agree with it in number if the line is to be grammatically correct -- that is to say,  what you should have written is "this is what every man clearly sights". And even if you had written the line this way,  it would be awkward since  "sight" means "catch an initial glimpse of".

Then there's your "I would like to go through my deep heart ... to find scopes which can grant its delight".  This is meaningless.

And what does anything you say in this awkward and formally archaic attempt at poetry have to do with what your title indicates is its subject?

Once again I urge you to stop thinking that you must cast what you write in the style and form of 18th and 19th century poetry, and that  to be poetry,  you must give advice about what "man" needs.

 

Dear Baldwin,
Thank you very much for your very useful and interesting observations which can be useful to me.

The question is not "can" they be useful.  But _will_ you use them.  I've made similar comments to you before.  But you still keep writing grammar gaffed, preachy, awkwardly phrased, archaically formed  "poems" in which you are more intent to get rhymes by any means than you are to make sense.

I'm still waiting for you tell how what it is you say in this awkwardly worded and formally archaic attempt at poetry has to do with what your title indicates is its subject.

Will you please speak directly to this question?

Dear Baldwin,
If you want me to tell you, first speak in a more reasonable way, second show  me a sample of your poetry, if you don't mind. Thank you in advance.

Please give me your definition of "reasonable" and then  show me as explicitly as possible and with evidence just how the way I have spoken to you does not fit with what you think that word means.  In addition, please tell me how giving you an example of any attempts at poetry I have written  would  undermine the truth of what I have said to you about the way you write and what you need to do if you are ever to write well.

Dear Baldwin,
I am really surprized. Is your poetry a secret, kept only for yourself?

What if it is?  What difference would that make regarding the truth or falsity of your claim that my messages to you are unreasonable in the way they are presented and whether or not you have evidence that this is so.

The fact that you are avoiding answering this question is a good indication that you have no such evidence.  And playing the aggrieved writer, as you have done,  in order to not answer what I asked of you is to engage in the tone argument fallacy.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_policing

Dear Baldwin,
What a great evidence you are talking about, "Whether your answer is reasonable or not'.

Sorry,  but I have no idea what you are attempting to say to me.

Dear Baldwin,
What a great evidence you are talking about, "Whether your answer is reasonable or not'.