Why?

C'est La Vie, sweet oracle.

in an ideal world we'd have no scars, no fears, no walls... and who could love someone who wasn't flawed and battle bruised. certainly not i, i couldn't love someone who hasn't lived.
half the joy of falling in love is moving each other past artificial restraints.

ahem ~cough cough~ dr.phil exit stage left.

I agree absolutely, Snowcrystal, luv. :-* Certainly, 'tis nectar for philosophy and conversation. Thank you for your wisdom and insight (now, who's the erotic oracle, pray tell?).  
 
So many myriad permutations of artificial constraints...

Ahh yes, why... the answers never suffice do they?

Enjoyed...

So, true, Fireglacier, luv. :-* (yep, I like it :-D) The answers breed more questions faster than do rabbits in the lettuce...

Thank you.

breaking  all love calls for unification of sense...

Explain your meaning further taito-10, luv, please. Your phrasing intrigues. Although, I must admit to this: the very notion of breaking all love seems to me utter nonsense. Love is the answer to it all; without it, we're wholly bereft.

However, I still want to hear what you have to say on this topic. So, explicate further, please. You have my attention.

maybe...because although love knows no bounds,we give it bounds.Instead of letting it flow we catch it and cage it,then say to be this you must be that (?) :) (nice)

Well, hashman, luv, that's true enough. :-* We certainly do tend to add those external restraints. Silly creatures, aren't we? :-p

You have a very lovely voice that readers can listen to and follow your words with ease...
I'm really enjoying listening to your many postings....Xo

Thank you, RainC, luv :-*!

I am trying to get these done so I can go back to writing poetry. :-p

I feel like if I stop, I won't ever do them. You're a trooper listening to all of them, you gem! :-*

I'll come by and do the same for you when I finish. :-)

Five star food for thought, Savaja.
Well written.

Unselfish, non-possessive love is nearly mystical.
It is an experience beyond magical.
Alas, tis why it proves elusive, difficult to locate.
But, it exists. This I know.

Ah, VegasPoet, luv :-* ~

You understand me. I wondered...but you have. Thank you for that, luv. You are a gem! It does, indeed. You have my deep respect, Sir. :-*

I really love the thought behind this and the question raised because love is often predicated on set norms and boundaries ... but I guess that's what makes stories like "Romeo & Juliet" and "The Bridges of Madison County" classics ...

... Wonderful thought provoking piece.

Thank you, LobodeSanPedro, luv :-*. If we are at least thinking about these concepts, then we can dialogue, which means, perhaps, things are more fluid than rigid.

As long as dialogue is possible, there is hope, eh?

We put these constraints on ourselves. I do agree with Vegaspoet though, it does exist but it's very hard to find. Enjoyed Savaja.

Thank you, xmar82, luv :-*.

I do think your assessment is accurate: putting constraints upon ourselves. Yes, VegasPoet does seem to see truly, eh? As do you. Thank you, again. :-*