The Absolution of Truth (A Semantical Tangent)

"Truth" is not a matter of subjection in oneself to decide what to believe.  You can't just believe whatever you want, and think that makes it "truth."  People have proclivities of bias, partiality, and favoritism within them, let alone pride.  If they just believe something because it benefits them, it may not be "truth."  They may simply just want to believe it.  It's not a matter of what you want to believe.

Validity doesn't have such things as motive and intent, to prove or disprove, based on what one wants to believe, in the context of universal "truth."  If something is valid, it is merely valid, accepted, or unaccepted.  For the most part, people prove and disprove many things as a means to justify what they think.  It can be what they choose to believe, even if they're willing to believe what they know is false.

Every single person can't just believe their own belief to where all of the beliefs of people are accepted as "true" by the world, especially when so many believe lies.  This is a critical source of conflict.  Believing in a concept like "truth" would reflect strength, in knowing that people are all wrong, including yourself!  It would take incredible devotion to be dedicated to "truth," in knowing that people always think they're right, let alone seeing that attitude in yourself.

Even with this knowledge, you will find times where you fail.  It would take common knowledge that you're going to fail, but that you can always try harder.  Such almost points out the importance of being humble on it's own!  In free will determinism, if it were to be "truth," there would be more of a cited resource of discipline, and a behavioral mannerism of setting an example in living up to the standard of that resource of discipline.  Everyone fails, everyone screws up, everyone sins.

Who is anyone to decide what is "true?"  If the need for being humble, and the knowledge of knowing a concept like "truth" would be universal and absolute, more people would be in agreement, and it would be very fundamental and basic.  The continual attempt of regulating choice in free will would be enhanced.  There'd be an honest processing of consequence, from patterns of behavior, through experience, to remind a person to keep striving for obedience to "truth!"

This becomes rudimentary knowledge, information, and awareness, leading to understanding and wisdom.  Absolution and unity would be sought by those who'd be willing to accept "truth."  People can certainly be original, unique, and individual on their own, within a universal "truth".  That can lead to an incredible experience of different relationships and communication in cultures and communities all around the world!

A concept like "truth" would have to be universal, and unmoved.  Absolute.  One "truth."  It would be an approach of discipline in acceptance and inquisition to gain common grounds of understanding, once it's known.  People can factor and regulate the many things that go into life, and how to live it, and what to do, once we're all in agreement of what "truth" is.  There is at least a whole lot more potential to do so.

"Truth" becomes understanding if there's an in-depth and thorough willingness to accept the learning curve of it, and it becomes wisdom when one will always be dedicated and devoted to the source of it, in how they live their life.  Things change, but the "truth" always was, is, and will be the same, only there will be more to learn and build upon, moving forward, perpetually.

One of the most important parts of "truth" is to have potential for innocence, and the protection of such.  Since everyone make mistakes, it's important to be humble and seek forgiveness.  That would be a great deal of what the absolution of "truth" is all about.

This all sounds optimistic and ideal, but there is a great transition of what's considered "reality" on the horizon.  Things mankind has not known or seen, nor witnessed to believe, will be known by everyone.  There will certainly be a great change involved.  Mankind merely lives in a time where no one has the answers.  One thing is clear - "truth" is absolute.