We Have Been DUPED Into DISARMING

America has disarmed more than you know.      
 You don't notice it because it is not done in an obvious manner.      
Our bombers haven't been cut up, turned into scrape metal.      
But they might as well have been.      
For about 75 B52s and about 65 B1s are no longer on"alert."  
(Ready to take off within 6 minutes, the time it takes missiles from Russian subs to reach us.)  
That's 140 bombers that may look impressive but really they are worthless, sitting ducks.      
     
Ditto for all our ICBMs !!!      
For under the policy started by Bill Clinton, they aren't  
 ready to be launched in the event of Russian attack.      
 In the old days, as soon as our satellites detected the ignition plumes from Russian missiles      
rising out of underground silos, the president would press the button to launch our retaliatory arsenal.      
     
But the latest policy is to guard against "accidental nuclear war" by testing    
our satellites and computers to make sure they're functioning properly.      
 But by the time the testing is done, the 6 minutes is almost all used up.      
In short, our ICBMs will be destroyed in their silos.      
So they are as useless as our strategic bombers.    
They're there, but not really there.    
For as soon as war comes,  -- as soon as we need them  --  they will be gone (destroyed).      
     
The rationale for giving up our ICBMs is that our submarine-launched    
ballistic missiles (SLBMs) will be sufficient to deter Russia.      
But we have cut our subs from the 39 boomer subs in Reagan's time down to just 12 today.    
(4 in port, 4 on position and 4 going out to relieve them.)      
     
To get to the point, Obama signed the New START treaty in 2010.      
It went into effect in 2011.    
It reduces our warheads on the 8 subs at sea to just 1,120 warheads.      
This is important for it brings us down to where the Kremlin wants us -- under 1,300 warheads.      
     
You see, Russia's nationwide ABM system can shoot down 1,300 incoming warheads.  
This is according to William T. Lee, an ex-CIA military analyst  
 ("Russia As The World's Number One Nuclear Power" Washington Times, 1/30/96).      
     
Clearly, if Russia can shoot down 1,300 warheads and we can send only 1,120 warheads,      
that will not strike fear into the heart of the Kremlin.      
     
I'm saying all 3 legs of our Triad are no good.    
They will no longer deter Russian attack as they have in the past.    
"Past performance is no guarantee of future results."      
     
Assuming the Kremlin is still Stalinist, though stealthily so,    
we must face facts, namely that Russian attack is coming    
in the near, if not immediate, future.    
For winning nuclear war against America is the Stalinist version of "finding the holy grail."  
And now that we can send over to Russia fewer warheads than Russia can    
intercept,  
well that means Russia can bomb us with impunity.    
Russia wins nuclear war !!      
     
PS: 8 subs x 20 missiles x 7 warheads = 1,120 warheads.      
They are supposed to have 8 warheads per missile.    
But one is a decoy loaded with "penetration aids".      
So I count only 7, not 8, warheads per missile.      
And only 20 missiles per sub.  Instead of 24 missiles.      
For that is the result of New START which Obama shouldn't have signed.      
     
PS: Suppose the Kremlin takes the "survival of the fittest" concept and twists it into this caricature: The side that survives, while the other side perishes, is automatically superior.    
 If the Kremlin thinks like that, they could claim(after bombing us) that  
America's inadequate defense "proves" the superiority of Communism over capitalism, etc.    
They would claim Russia's capitalism from 1991 to 2017 was    
part of the deception needed to trick the USA into disarming.    
Now that it, capitalism, has served its purpose, the Kremlin    
might even declare that its time to revert to Communism again.      
     
Finally, the Bible predicts that a dictator will take over the world      
by "making war against the saints," ie, the predominantly Christian nations (Revelation 13.7).    
Of course, that is followed by Christ intervening, reversing Russia's victory.      
So don't feel too bad about what's about to happen.    
It won't be the end of the world.    
Rather it is a sign of the Second Coming.    
And the Christians and Jews that depart at the time of "the trump of God" (the blasts of the nuclear bombs)    
-- that will be how "the Rapture" takes place(1st Thessalonians 4.16-5.3).    
Very different from how preachers sugar coat it.