"Doing A Damian."

      Hello, brothers and sisters of the Underground. It is I. Interesting story here. So I know someone who’s taking college classes, and had turned in a thesis, or something that they had to write for a grade.

      Anyhow, they have to run their work through an AI detection system. The report came back as 97% chance that AI was used. He knew he wrote the paper, and had to go through all the red tape to prove that point.

      It’s resolved, folks. My friend proved his case, that the work was indeed his. Here’s the thing, through the whole process they found out the computer is wrong. And on more than one occasion this occurrence happened.

      It’s happened so much the university had to update it’s policy because of these cases happening. So I know why they use it, to catch hacks and potential plagiarist activity. So basically this thing has problem detecting people who can actually write. lol.

      97%, folks. That AI was used. That means the machine would think the same of us, folks. I don’t know about you, but I don’t know whether to be slightly flattered or extremely pissed.

      Cause it means it’s kinda meaningless in certain capacities. If it’s gonna accuse people who can write of using AI. If you can’t write though, you might be discovered. lol.

      There are innovators and imitators in the world. All the writers I know here are innovators, we create, we write, and push the envelope.

      Imitators try to mimic what we do. For attention, for money, or whatever reason they have that day.

      But it damn sure isn’t for writing great material. Their cons, hacks, opportunists, trying to corrupt our craft. So I know I went on a tangent here. As I often do.

      Our very own, Fia Naturie, calls it: “Doing A Damian.” When you rant or go off on a tangent with a sidetrack point. If you follow? I bring it up because it’s the title of the write. So I’m giving her credit. Peace, Love, and Lennon.