Philip Schofield and Rock Hudson were happily gay players! So why shouldn't Edward Windsor also be?

   
By Stanley Collymore    
   
A state of affairs known about,    
fully acknowledged and also    
specifically, supported by    
their respective wives. So why then shouldn't Sophie Rhys Jones effectively do the same,    
if personally this gay tolerance assured her    
the lifestyle, which she discernibly wanted    
and still clearly opulently has? Undeniably however what actually had me in stitches    
of very boisterous laughter, was the Daily    
Mail's hack rather specifically describing    
Sophie's Windsor monarichal and simply    
still ongoing presence within that family    
as being shrouded in a veil of mystery! I    
don't think so! As who crucially sensibly    
would really have thought, such a thing,    
bearing in mind the generally countless    
commentators specifically on the Daily    
Mail's clickbait platform, and obviously    
likewise evidently puerile, serf fawning    
impactful bandwagon! Clearly morons,    
who seemingly, indefatigably distinctly    
obviously know, every minute detail of    
these discernibly characteristically as    
well as clearly close-knit monarchical    
Windsors' private lives; thoughts; and    
actions! Or so, are undoubtedly given    
to preposterously and decidedly also    
significantly unquestionably, actually    
vaingloriously claim, literally despite    
never having met far less so actually    
knowing any of them; that, never the    
less they unquestionably knew what    
undoubtedly, their Windsor masters    
and mistresses were really thinking.    
   
(C) Stanley V. Collymore    
24 November 2024.    
   
   
Author's Remarks:    
Homosexuality was legalized in 1967 across the entire UK and is still universally here quite criminal free; so as long as persons privately and consensually practise it, it's effectively, I firmly and unequivocally state, no business of mine or additionally I do conscionably believe, the actual  business of anyone, other than the persons directly concerned. Furthermore, as someone, myself, who is staunchly, and has been so all my life, distinctively heterosexual it's likewise absolutely no concern of mine who legally practices homosexuality unless rather evidently it becomes criminally abusively, and as such involves the sorts of things which are essentially and even ironically discernibly and thoroughly commonplace in heterosexuality like rape, sexual exploitation and other clearly multifaceted sexual abuses. And therefore, if consequently fully knowing the state of play they're letting themselves into, where in terms of homosexual/ lesbian or pure heterosexual behaviour, any individual consciously opts to marry someone who is clearly homosexual or lesbian, as far as I'm personally concerned it's strictly none of my business and I irrefutably don't or will ever seek to make it so! Evidently their own personal affair even if obviously one of the persons in such a relationship is clearly heterosexual in their leanings and discernibly and most categorically for their own personal reasons ends up being a supposedly working member of the Britiish monarchical family!    
   
Far better, I would readily affirm, than being a bone idle, lazy, stalking, social climbing, quite workshy, no life nor any evident, meaningful ambition other than her sights on the British Crown, as is so self-evidently the case with the odious, racist, white supremacist, British taxpayers grifter, Kate Middleton and her very much older counterpart and very "evil woman" Camilla Parker Bowles, who got what she was discernibly and similarly sinisterly after. Both succinct appraisals astutely made by the late Elizabeth Windsor, Regina Britannia!