Dreams

Such engaging words to see, it reads like a serenade to the mind, my poet.

Thank you.  But I'd like you to say why you feel my words are engaging.

It engaged my mind for the time to took to read the brevity of your craft at hand, my poet

Enjoy your evening as well...

"It engaged my mind for the time to  [SIC it?] took to read the brevity of your craft at hand, my poet"

 Sorry,  but this grammar-gaffed statement ["time to took"???] makes no sense.  Like your other comments, It is inscrutable.

It makes perfect sense.. I find it rather peculiar you have taken the time to attempt to monopolize intellects with such mundane unrelated issues, instead of concentrating with the best interest of integrity, which is the blessing at hand, your craft.

No one can think on behalf of another person, or map out their cognitive thought process, you may try with your long prose of word play, however, it is preposterous and juvenile at best.

Therefore, before, we exchange the ethics of proper English 101, the grammatic concepts/perceptions floating those brain hemispheres of yours. I will leave my sentiment short and simple for like minded people of your caliber to comprehend..

Enjoy your day and have a great weekend, my poet

I'm not sure if there's such a thing as the "ethics" of good English.  But do you really want to claim that "time to took" is not a solecism?  
 
And did you mean to say "floating IN those brain hemispheres of yours"?  I'm not sure that concepts have the ability to cause brain hemispheres to rest or move on or near the surface of a liquid without sinking.

Moreover. what "word play"  did I engage in?

I asked you why you felt my words were engaging.  
 
You and THAT they were and on;y for as long as it took to read them.  
 
"It engaged my mind for the time to took to read the brevity of your craft"    
 
which is not an answer to my question.  
 
And then you went on to say   that I  
 
"have taken the time to attempt to monopolize intellects with such mundane unrelated issues, instead of concentrating with the best interest of integrity, which is the blessing at hand, your craft."  
 
Leaving aside the fact that "the best interest of integrity" is a puzzling phrase and that how I "monopolized intellects" [???] by asking if what you wrote contains a solecism is beyond me,  the only person here who has not spoken of my craft, let alone how I displayed it,  is you.

Do you take the time to look up the definition to the words, I use in reference to your comment(s) If so, you would come to the conclusion, you do monopolize your readers with such trivial nuisances that plays not significant when extending common curtesy why they express themselves as they see fit according to complimenting your work.

"Do you take the time to look up the definition to the words, I use in reference to your comment(s) If so, you would come to the conclusion, you do monopolize your readers with such trivial nuisances that plays not significant when extending common curtesy why they express themselves as they see fit according to complimenting your work."  
 
Is there such a thing as a "trivial harm or injury"?  
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nuisance  
   
And if there are such things, please point me to where they appear in anything I've written to you.  
   
And the issue is not the meaning of the words you use, but of the meaning of your grammar gaffed and solecistic expressions.  
   
Moreover, in order to be grammatically correct as well as intelligible, shouldn't your "with such trivial nuisances that plays not significant ..."  be "with such trivial nuisances that PLAY  insignificantly ..."?  And haven't you misspelled "courtesy"?  
    
In any case,  none of this ill-founded complaint of yours does anything that answers, let alone actually deals with, the question I asked you as to whether the phrase "time to took" is a solecism. Perhaps you'd better look up the word "solecism"  before you answer my question -- assuming you will do so directly.

My mistakes are my own, and I claim them righteously so, I think I do fairly well, for a person who speaks French, and self-tight herself English, therefore, I asked you a question, and as always from the history of our exchange of words, you evade, and open up the avenue of more dialogue therefore, my poet, I will reiterate, your poem was engaging to read, you may interpret my sincerity at best.

Enjoy the cold weather in Chicago... and have a great weekend.

What question did you ask me?

And why have you not answered my question about whether "time to took" is a solecism, not to mention my question about why you found my submission engaging?

It was inspiring, sexy, sensational, and engaging to my mind to have taken the time to read...

Awwww
Sensuous imagery of dreams!
Beautiful write-up