deepundergroundpoetry.com
Genesis 1.20 and 1.24 Reveal God's Modus Operandi
Genesis One, verses 20 and 24 POINT TO EVOLUTION as God's modus operandi.
It starts off with God bequeathing to Nature ("the waters..the earth") the ability
to create life ("bring forth the moving creature..the living creature..").
But not only is the original creating of life turned over to Nature,
the subsequent development of the species - speciation - is also turned over to Nature -
in the form of the very first original species or lifeforms.
For we read that way back in the beginning, God endowed each lifeform with the power to reproduce "after their kind."
No other mechanism or process is given in Genesis One to account for speciation !!
God combines "reproducing according to kind" with producing an "abundance" of species !!
This tells us "reproducing after one's own kind" RESULTS in speciation !!
Reproduction is all it takes to produce the "abundance" of species
that Genesis One speaks of, and which God has ordained !!
But how can this be, for "reproducing after one's kind" and producing new species are opposites.
They are poles apart, not the same thing !!
Well, the obvious (or not so obvious) solution to this apparent contradiction is to
take "reproduction after one's kind" NOT as an absolute.
Instead of dogs producing dogs 100% of the time, reduce it to just 99.999% of the time.
This allows for speciation to take place 0.001% of the time !!
Where Creationists go wrong is like this:
they take "reproduce after one's kind" as an ABSOLUTE thing.
All they have to do is allow the very slightest degree of variation (or error).
That's all it will take !!
Come on, all you Creationists out there !!
Give in just a little bit !!
Now that you can see that Genesis 1.20, 24 supports theistic evolution,
you should be willing to forsake your creationist darkness and come to the light of the "dawn" of Darwinism.
Yes, if you take the word Darwin and subtract the letters R and I, you have the word DAWN.
That's appropriate. For Darwin brought the dawn, the light of truth to the subject of the origin of life !!
Not just Darwin, there was Alfred Russell Wallace.
Its wrong to leave him out of the picture.
It starts off with God bequeathing to Nature ("the waters..the earth") the ability
to create life ("bring forth the moving creature..the living creature..").
But not only is the original creating of life turned over to Nature,
the subsequent development of the species - speciation - is also turned over to Nature -
in the form of the very first original species or lifeforms.
For we read that way back in the beginning, God endowed each lifeform with the power to reproduce "after their kind."
No other mechanism or process is given in Genesis One to account for speciation !!
God combines "reproducing according to kind" with producing an "abundance" of species !!
This tells us "reproducing after one's own kind" RESULTS in speciation !!
Reproduction is all it takes to produce the "abundance" of species
that Genesis One speaks of, and which God has ordained !!
But how can this be, for "reproducing after one's kind" and producing new species are opposites.
They are poles apart, not the same thing !!
Well, the obvious (or not so obvious) solution to this apparent contradiction is to
take "reproduction after one's kind" NOT as an absolute.
Instead of dogs producing dogs 100% of the time, reduce it to just 99.999% of the time.
This allows for speciation to take place 0.001% of the time !!
Where Creationists go wrong is like this:
they take "reproduce after one's kind" as an ABSOLUTE thing.
All they have to do is allow the very slightest degree of variation (or error).
That's all it will take !!
Come on, all you Creationists out there !!
Give in just a little bit !!
Now that you can see that Genesis 1.20, 24 supports theistic evolution,
you should be willing to forsake your creationist darkness and come to the light of the "dawn" of Darwinism.
Yes, if you take the word Darwin and subtract the letters R and I, you have the word DAWN.
That's appropriate. For Darwin brought the dawn, the light of truth to the subject of the origin of life !!
Not just Darwin, there was Alfred Russell Wallace.
Its wrong to leave him out of the picture.
Published 4th Apr 2020
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 1
reading list entries 0
comments 4
reads 385
Commenting Preference:
The author encourages honest critique.
4th Apr 2020 10:20am
Actually Alfred Russell Wallace was better than Darwin. For Wallace freely gave GOD credit for evolution. Darwin? Not so much.
4th Apr 2020 9:17pm
I come from the same home district of England as Darwin, so he is a familiar character to me. He was in a race with Wallace to publish their identical and separately arrived at theories. Darwin had great doubts about his faith so not surprising he gave 'not so much' credit to God for evolution.
Thanx for your input.
"Home district" - is that comparable to a county or what ??
I am thinking of writing an open letter to Richard Dawkins. About evolution endorsed by the Bible. I am thinking of calling him lazy - because he could have noticed how Genesis 1.20,24 supports evolution. But he hasn't bothered to look at even just the very first chapter !! Happy Easter to you !!
"Home district" - is that comparable to a county or what ??
I am thinking of writing an open letter to Richard Dawkins. About evolution endorsed by the Bible. I am thinking of calling him lazy - because he could have noticed how Genesis 1.20,24 supports evolution. But he hasn't bothered to look at even just the very first chapter !! Happy Easter to you !!
6th Apr 2020 8:23pm
Darwin was born in the town of Shrewsbury in the county of Shropshire. I was born in and have lived in villages near that town.
