The Cherubs in the Holy of Holies Reveal the Truth of Evolution!!!

This poem is practice for the video i want to make.
 about the meaning of the 2 cherubs on top of the Ark of the Covenant  
 in the Holy of Holies  -  
In the Temple that used to be in Jerusalem.  
Anyway, the 2 cherubs are COMPOSITE FIGURES: part eagle, part ox, part lion. And with the head of a man.  
Since i am into (theistic) EVOLUTION, i am always on the alert for any    
passage in the Bible that i come across  that supports evolution.    
Evolution boils down to the idea that all life forms are connected    
(the first species produces the second, and the second produces the third, and so on).    
So when i realized that these 2 cherubs are different species CONNECTED TO EACH OTHER,  
 i reacted with, "WOW - that is what i am looking for."    
That CONNECTEDNESS = support for Evolution !!!    
The eagle would stand for birds in general.    
And birds are actually modified reptiles.  
So reptiles are meant here.  
The ox stands for mammals - they followed the reptiles.  
 The lion stands for cats which are tree climbers.    
Which points to tree-climbing monkeys and primates. The head of a man (on the cherub) conveys that man comes forth from the process or sequence i just listed:    
reptiles followed by mammals, followed by primates (with Man as the crown or climax of the evolutionary progression).  
Not that Man owes his existence to the animals.  
Rather he owes it to God.  
But God creates Man via the animals. Like an adult comes forth from the child.    
But the mother is the Creator figure, of course.  
Not the child that is the conduit.  
   
Yes, i am overjoyed about the 2 cherubs in the Holy of Holies being COMPOSITE creatures:  
 God is revealing thru them the secret of His creating process.    
I mean God is exposing just how He created the human species - thru the use of the  lower species.  
 LSS: evolution is true. Not evolution by chance alone.    
Rather evolution according to God's will: Theistic Evolution !!  
PART 2:  
 Why would God have Moses put such a freakish statue in the most holy, most sacred room in the Jewish Temple.  
Well, the obvious answer (/4) is this:  
 God wants to reveal (what a strange way to do it !!!) the way  
He creates the great VARIETY of lifeforms that is on planet Earth.  
 Namely, by one species producing ANOTHER species.  
And another, on and on.  
The interconnectedness of the species within the cherubs conveys that in real life the species are CONNECTED.  
 Evolution says the same thing that the 2 cherubs say ( or hint at).  
Namely that all lifeforms derive from an original ancestor.  
 
Now for part 2:  
In order for the 2 cherubs, their message, to really mean what i say it means,  
namely that evolution is true (and one species comes from a prior species),  
the cherubs NEED to be in the womb, a room symbolizing the womb.  
Why is that? Because the WOMB is where evolution takes place.  
Imagine going back in time to when the first mammal was hatched out of an egg laid by the reptile mother.
 How did the mammal genes get put into the DNA of the egg of the reptile mother. Well the gene mutations could accumulate gradually over several generations without being expressed. Finally after there were enuff of them to form the organs of a primitive mammal, for example, a miotreme - that's when the genes would be "expressed."
 The duck-billed platepus is a miotreme.
Im saying it is in the womb of the mother that the gene mutations in the sperm and ovum would become  
manifest, become expressed - in the form of a new kind of baby - a mammal. Pardon the crudeness of the way i am saying it.  
As u can tell, i am a rank amateur in biology.  
Anyway, like i say, the 2 cherubs really do need to be in a womb-like room - if the evolution message is to be taken as legit.  
 
Well lo and behold, the Holy of Holies really IS a womb-like room.  
It really does stand for the womb.  
So this VALIDATES my claim about the meaning of the 2 cherubs being that all lifeforms are connected.  
And that theistic evolution is real (not the atheistic kind, of course)).  
But what do i mean when i say that the Holy of Holies is a room that stands for or represents or corresponds to the womb??  
Well, the Christian Church is a woman, so to speak(Ephesians 5.23-28; Revelation 21.2-3,9).  
But the Church is an extension of the Jewish Temple which preceded it.  
So if the Church is a female, then so should be the Temple which serves as precursor.  
So there you have it: the Temple can rightly be thought of as female in form.  
And females by definition have a uterus at the core or center, lets agree.  
So we should look at the interior of the old Jewish Temple to see if it had a central room, a room at its core.  
Well of course it did. The Holy of Holies is a room within a larger room called the Holy Place.  
In turn the Holy Place was surrounded or enclosed within a larger room.  
Actually only a courtyard with walls or a fence.  
Long story short, the Holy of Holies was the room within a room within a room.  
It was the 3rd room like God's Heaven is called the "3rd Heaven"(2 Corinthians 12.2-4).  
So lets consider the possibility that the Holy of Holies corresponds to the uterus.  
If so then the curtain between that room and the Holy Place would correspond to the cervix between the uterus and the birth canal.  
And the Holy Place would = the birth canal.  
And then there is the correspondence between the High Priest entering the Holy Place and the male member entering the birth canal - during intercourse.  
Is there any evidence that the High Priest stands for the male member?? Well he does wear  bulbous turban just for the time he enters the Temple (meaning the Holy of Holies).  
Plus he sort of imitates the male member in terms of carrying a bowl of blood into the Holy of Holies, which blood is then "sprinkled" (Leviticus 16) on all the sides of Ark of the Covenant, like sperm from the male member travels into the Holy of Holies and does what?? Surrounds the ovum.  
 
Now there is an obvious difference between how far the male member enters in and how far the High Priest enters in.The Male Member stops at the cervix, whereas the HP goes past the curtain.  
Obviously blood cells dont have tails like sperm do.  
In order for the blood to imitate the sperm, the bowl of blood has to be carried into the Holy of Holies.  
The blood is sprinkled by the High Priest's finger which is somewhat similar to what the male member does.  
I mean simply that it releases its load within the birth canal in what u could call a "sprinkling" manner.  
 
Now for the Ark upon which the 2 cherubs stand, facing each other, with their wings pointing to the center of the top of the Ark.  
I mean one cherub is on the far side of the lid of the Ark, while the other cherub is at the other end.  
So that there is a space between the 2 cherubs.  
That space is called "the Mercy Seat," where God invisibly sits or dwells.  
But just what does the Ark of the Covenant represent in the context of the analogy i am making here??  
It would correspond to the ovum in the uterus !!  
The ovum contains the DNA instructions for the building of the body of the offspring.  
Likewise the Ark contained the stones on which was written the TEN COMMANDMENTS!! - the DNA for the building of the society of Israel.  
Yes the Ark = the ovum, without question.  
The 2 cherubs would have to be the 2 Fallopian Tubes above the uterus.  
But the cherubs arent above the Holy of Holies, only above the Ark.  
So there is an anomaly here.  
But in real life the ovum does come from the Fallopian Tubes so the connection between the Cherubs and the Ark is in line with that.  
Now, for the punchline: the Mercy Seat is in the Holy of Holies, of course.  
And the Hebrew for mercy is actually the same letters - consonants - as the word.. u guessed it: WOMB.  
Yes, "womb" and "mercy" are  the same word in Hebrew. "Ra cham" = one and "re chem" is the other.
So, I am not the only one calling the Holy of Holies a womb-like room.  
The Bible itself uses a word ("mercy") that is suggestive of the Hebrew for "womb."  
It uses that word for the throne of God, implying that God dwells in the womb in a special way.  
PS: (1) The 3 animals and man in the Cherubs all belong to the same Chorodata phylum.
This supports that they are not just a random mix, rather a progression of species.
(2) The eagle represents birds in general.
But if we go by Genesis 1's Day 4, the birds stand for the creation process which begins with fish and ends with birds.
But if we go with apostle Paul in Hebrews 11.3, the time frame
changes from "days" in Genesis over to eons(in the Greek)!!
 So instead of only fish followed by only birds, we would be free to be inclusive.

It would be fish, followed by amphibians, then reptiles, then birds.
For that is the logical sequence of the species.
Fish represent a lifetime spent in the water.
Amphibians spend the first part of their lives
in the water, but the latter part  on the ground.
Then come the reptiles, which spend all of their time
 out of the water and on the ground.
Finally come the birds which take to the air.
So there is a logical progression meant in Day 4 of Genesis 1.