deepundergroundpoetry.com
Memorandum
Government Memorandum
To: Ministers of State and Department Heads Civil Service
Subject: Quantitative Quality of Communication
My quintessential quandary when interfacing with flummery, and incorporating panjandrummery is to regard the post-modernistic pseudo-neoclassical tendency for over obfuscation as detrimental to the intent of the author/s and inversely proportional to the comprehension of the recipient/s. This is also counter intuitive to those discerning the dichotomy with its inherent requirement for clarity compared to simplistic ultra-understatement of the augmentative arguments implicit to congruent cognition of the cogency of said communication is causing concern.
In future ministers and departmental leaders will, with full cognisance of the needs of the proletariat, ensure that extra effort at eudemonistic discourse between recipients and their ability to appreciate the fundamental correlation between those subservient to governmental diktats and ourselves. The need to create a symbiotic relationship sympathetic to the symmetry of the observationally perceived perception of the author is unequivocally unambiguous not to say refulgent in the aforementioned intentional clarity.
Further, those of you perusing this missive thus far and have not yet succumbed to morpheonic, catatonic torpor, take notice: departmental directives that do not contain a quotient of self-serving bovine excremental content will, in future, be severely reprimanded even to the extent of partial emolumental sequestration where recidivism is an aggravating factor.
I hope I make myself clear.
John Godwottery Head of Communications
To: Ministers of State and Department Heads Civil Service
Subject: Quantitative Quality of Communication
My quintessential quandary when interfacing with flummery, and incorporating panjandrummery is to regard the post-modernistic pseudo-neoclassical tendency for over obfuscation as detrimental to the intent of the author/s and inversely proportional to the comprehension of the recipient/s. This is also counter intuitive to those discerning the dichotomy with its inherent requirement for clarity compared to simplistic ultra-understatement of the augmentative arguments implicit to congruent cognition of the cogency of said communication is causing concern.
In future ministers and departmental leaders will, with full cognisance of the needs of the proletariat, ensure that extra effort at eudemonistic discourse between recipients and their ability to appreciate the fundamental correlation between those subservient to governmental diktats and ourselves. The need to create a symbiotic relationship sympathetic to the symmetry of the observationally perceived perception of the author is unequivocally unambiguous not to say refulgent in the aforementioned intentional clarity.
Further, those of you perusing this missive thus far and have not yet succumbed to morpheonic, catatonic torpor, take notice: departmental directives that do not contain a quotient of self-serving bovine excremental content will, in future, be severely reprimanded even to the extent of partial emolumental sequestration where recidivism is an aggravating factor.
I hope I make myself clear.
John Godwottery Head of Communications
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 3
reading list entries 2
comments 6
reads 936
Commenting Preference:
The author encourages honest critique.