Is the World Safe for Conversation Anymore?
EdibleWords said:
Why not discuss the topic instead of criticizing his news source? You cite Wiki sometimes, I’d bet.
Great example of cancel-culture, though. 👍
Step one: Ignore the fact that a dishonest source was quoted, and instead demand that it should be discussed anyway as being as true and valid as any other point of view.
Step two: accuse the person of a made up thing to divert from the use of obvious lies. Don’t be smart enough to understand that the obviously made up thing was made up to help stupid and usually racist people not feel so bad when their actions are held to account
Step three: complain again about how nobody wants to listen to you.
Step four: continue to only quote things that reinforce your dullard’s world view and personal fears, fed by your total lack of understanding of how the world actually works, and your inability to learn it. Don’t worry about the credibility of the source. Don’t read the replies. Don’t stop for a moment to wonder if the philosophy is right, and maybe the true exercise of intelligence is the learned ability to consider information and make an informed decision about the veracity of it.
Keep going. Keep banging away. Keep winning the internet. Go to your grave, your lineage of stupid firmly secure, a solid legacy of the mediocre, knowing you really did a good job of winning the internet on a poetry forum. You put aside world peace, mental stability, book smarts, credibility among your peers, but goddamn if you didn’t really show who’s boss, anonymously, pointlessly, among the 5 people in 7 billion who read it, on a poetry site....
Repeat from step 1. Do it as fast as you can. Make sure you are fast. Quickly.
Why not discuss the topic instead of criticizing his news source? You cite Wiki sometimes, I’d bet.
Great example of cancel-culture, though. 👍
Step one: Ignore the fact that a dishonest source was quoted, and instead demand that it should be discussed anyway as being as true and valid as any other point of view.
Step two: accuse the person of a made up thing to divert from the use of obvious lies. Don’t be smart enough to understand that the obviously made up thing was made up to help stupid and usually racist people not feel so bad when their actions are held to account
Step three: complain again about how nobody wants to listen to you.
Step four: continue to only quote things that reinforce your dullard’s world view and personal fears, fed by your total lack of understanding of how the world actually works, and your inability to learn it. Don’t worry about the credibility of the source. Don’t read the replies. Don’t stop for a moment to wonder if the philosophy is right, and maybe the true exercise of intelligence is the learned ability to consider information and make an informed decision about the veracity of it.
Keep going. Keep banging away. Keep winning the internet. Go to your grave, your lineage of stupid firmly secure, a solid legacy of the mediocre, knowing you really did a good job of winning the internet on a poetry forum. You put aside world peace, mental stability, book smarts, credibility among your peers, but goddamn if you didn’t really show who’s boss, anonymously, pointlessly, among the 5 people in 7 billion who read it, on a poetry site....
Repeat from step 1. Do it as fast as you can. Make sure you are fast. Quickly.
Anonymous
anna_grin said:i invite you to present this with all possible politeness in the disinfo thread h
I'm not sure it is possible to crawl into Biden's shorts in order to verify whether he is shitless or not.
anna_grin said:maybe am para but this seems like another attempt to bait me considering my latest poem
I think its coincidental. This thread seems to be just another suppository for sharing any anti Biden / Democrat rhetoric privately being masturbated to. Breitbart is really scraping the bottom of the barrel. It's like the Hustler Magazine of journalism.
I meant to say, repository.
I'm not sure it is possible to crawl into Biden's shorts in order to verify whether he is shitless or not.
anna_grin said:maybe am para but this seems like another attempt to bait me considering my latest poem
I think its coincidental. This thread seems to be just another suppository for sharing any anti Biden / Democrat rhetoric privately being masturbated to. Breitbart is really scraping the bottom of the barrel. It's like the Hustler Magazine of journalism.
I meant to say, repository.
hemihead said:
Step one: Ignore the fact that a dishonest source was quoted,
I thought you were claiming to be genius level smart. You aren’t even trying, are you?
I can discuss topics and use your discredited media platforms to do it. Why can’t a smart guy like you do it? See how I quoted Time, CNN and others?
Even a broke clock can tell the truth a couple times a day. So discuss the content. Debunk it, if you like. It’s a starting point of interest.
I know it’s scary, but try to think a little.
....demand that it should be discussed anyway as being as true and valid as any other point of view.
How much coffee were you on when you wrote this???
Step two: accuse the person of a made up thing to divert from the use of obvious lies.
I didn’t ask you to make anything up, or play make-believe.
If there is an obvious lie in the report, go ahead and discuss the contrasting reality. Bring up another source. Discuss motive.
Major news outlets hire hundreds of writers and issue many retractions.
Don’t be smart enough to understand that the obviously made up thing was made up to help stupid and usually racist people not feel so bad when their actions are held to account
Oh, yes, only stupid racists use fallible media.
Golly, you’re so smart. 🤓
Step three: complain again about how nobody wants to listen to you.
I never had to. This thread here is too busy to even keep up with.
Step four: continue to only quote things that reinforce your dullard’s world view and personal fears, fed by your total lack of understanding of how the world actually works, and your inability to learn it. Don’t worry about the credibility of the source. Don’t read the replies. Don’t stop for a moment to wonder if the philosophy is right, and maybe the true exercise of intelligence is the learned ability to consider information and make an informed decision about the veracity of it.
Stop. Don’t be so self critical. I understand admitting your faults, but this is a bit much.
Keep going. Keep banging away. Keep winning the internet. Go to your grave, your lineage of stupid firmly secure, a solid legacy of the mediocre, knowing you really did a good job of winning the internet on a poetry forum. You put aside world peace, mental stability, book smarts, credibility among your peers, but goddamn if you didn’t really show who’s boss, anonymously, pointlessly, among the 5 people in 7 billion who read it, on a poetry site....
I appreciate the advice but my way works better for me.
Repeat from step 1. Do it as fast as you can. Make sure you are fast. Quickly.
Again, thanks 4 the tip. 🙄👍
For a sec there I was curious what you actually thought of the current Middle East crisis.
Step one: Ignore the fact that a dishonest source was quoted,
I thought you were claiming to be genius level smart. You aren’t even trying, are you?
I can discuss topics and use your discredited media platforms to do it. Why can’t a smart guy like you do it? See how I quoted Time, CNN and others?
Even a broke clock can tell the truth a couple times a day. So discuss the content. Debunk it, if you like. It’s a starting point of interest.
I know it’s scary, but try to think a little.
....demand that it should be discussed anyway as being as true and valid as any other point of view.
How much coffee were you on when you wrote this???
Step two: accuse the person of a made up thing to divert from the use of obvious lies.
I didn’t ask you to make anything up, or play make-believe.
If there is an obvious lie in the report, go ahead and discuss the contrasting reality. Bring up another source. Discuss motive.
Major news outlets hire hundreds of writers and issue many retractions.
Don’t be smart enough to understand that the obviously made up thing was made up to help stupid and usually racist people not feel so bad when their actions are held to account
Oh, yes, only stupid racists use fallible media.
Golly, you’re so smart. 🤓
Step three: complain again about how nobody wants to listen to you.
I never had to. This thread here is too busy to even keep up with.
Step four: continue to only quote things that reinforce your dullard’s world view and personal fears, fed by your total lack of understanding of how the world actually works, and your inability to learn it. Don’t worry about the credibility of the source. Don’t read the replies. Don’t stop for a moment to wonder if the philosophy is right, and maybe the true exercise of intelligence is the learned ability to consider information and make an informed decision about the veracity of it.
Stop. Don’t be so self critical. I understand admitting your faults, but this is a bit much.
Keep going. Keep banging away. Keep winning the internet. Go to your grave, your lineage of stupid firmly secure, a solid legacy of the mediocre, knowing you really did a good job of winning the internet on a poetry forum. You put aside world peace, mental stability, book smarts, credibility among your peers, but goddamn if you didn’t really show who’s boss, anonymously, pointlessly, among the 5 people in 7 billion who read it, on a poetry site....
I appreciate the advice but my way works better for me.
Repeat from step 1. Do it as fast as you can. Make sure you are fast. Quickly.
Again, thanks 4 the tip. 🙄👍
For a sec there I was curious what you actually thought of the current Middle East crisis.
JohnnyBlaze said:
I think its coincidental. This thread seems to be just another suppository for sharing any anti Biden / Democrat rhetoric privately being masturbated to. Breitbart is really scraping the bottom of the barrel. It's like the Hustler Magazine of journalism.
I meant to say, repository.
I’m not an ableist so what is your white male justification for bringing your dominating energy and sexualized references?
This is an equitable conversation so listen to your female diversity counterpart, Anna. She’s the one who feels qualified to add to this thread in self-promotion.
And nobody can disqualify her. I’ve given her special needs room for anything, even trolling, as far as my hostessing authority extends.
You have to watch yourself. You have no special interest group to protect you. Your only shelter is claiming to be a liberal and checking your privilege.
I think its coincidental. This thread seems to be just another suppository for sharing any anti Biden / Democrat rhetoric privately being masturbated to. Breitbart is really scraping the bottom of the barrel. It's like the Hustler Magazine of journalism.
I meant to say, repository.
I’m not an ableist so what is your white male justification for bringing your dominating energy and sexualized references?
This is an equitable conversation so listen to your female diversity counterpart, Anna. She’s the one who feels qualified to add to this thread in self-promotion.
And nobody can disqualify her. I’ve given her special needs room for anything, even trolling, as far as my hostessing authority extends.
You have to watch yourself. You have no special interest group to protect you. Your only shelter is claiming to be a liberal and checking your privilege.
Anonymous
Not a clue as to what those last two posts directed at me were about.
JohnnyBlaze said:Not a clue as to what those last two posts directed at me were about.
White male fragility. That’s what we’re discussing. You don’t get the same playing field as our diversity does.
It’s all about equity, not equality. So check your privilege. You don’t get to dominate and bully here. You gotta play nicer than everybody else.
I only said Anna could troll. Not you.
White male fragility. That’s what we’re discussing. You don’t get the same playing field as our diversity does.
It’s all about equity, not equality. So check your privilege. You don’t get to dominate and bully here. You gotta play nicer than everybody else.
I only said Anna could troll. Not you.
Anonymous
EdibleWords said:
White male fragility. That’s what we’re discussing. You don’t get the same playing field as our diversity does.
It’s all about equity, not equality. So check your privilege. You don’t get to dominate and bully here. You gotta play nicer than everybody else.
I only said Anna could troll. Not you.
I didn't realize it was trolling to point out that Breitbart.com is hardly a reliable news source.
Trump pardoned Steven Bannon, his former Chief of Staff and the guy who ran Breitbart, for scamming donors out of hundreds of thousands that instead of being used in building the Wall, subsidized his lavish lifestyle.
I know, I know - why private donations were necessary when Trump promised Mexico would pay for the Wall is a whole nother story.
White male fragility. That’s what we’re discussing. You don’t get the same playing field as our diversity does.
It’s all about equity, not equality. So check your privilege. You don’t get to dominate and bully here. You gotta play nicer than everybody else.
I only said Anna could troll. Not you.
I didn't realize it was trolling to point out that Breitbart.com is hardly a reliable news source.
Trump pardoned Steven Bannon, his former Chief of Staff and the guy who ran Breitbart, for scamming donors out of hundreds of thousands that instead of being used in building the Wall, subsidized his lavish lifestyle.
I know, I know - why private donations were necessary when Trump promised Mexico would pay for the Wall is a whole nother story.
