Is the World Safe for Conversation Anymore?
Ricky-Journals
I wanted to start on Amy’s Ghostly Bible
and she said I couldn’t
until I received her envelope of work
so I closed my eyes and said
but-but-butter on toast the thing you know
I haven’t a stutter
lefties are weak
I said to Kamala
they gonna put a clone of me there
before your ass gets in that seat
Hi, I’m Ricky, the vessel of Barbara
she wants me to go outside
during a strong wind
fly like Mary Poppins
but opening up umbrella in direction of the wind
I guarantee I won’t fly up
so I call her a liar
because I know I’m only gonna go sidewards
Back to the Biden pen commercial
he says
“I tried several times to put the pen
inside my jacket but in the end
it fuck it, like me, put it in your pocket.”
😎🤜🤛
I wanted to start on Amy’s Ghostly Bible
and she said I couldn’t
until I received her envelope of work
so I closed my eyes and said
but-but-butter on toast the thing you know
I haven’t a stutter
lefties are weak
I said to Kamala
they gonna put a clone of me there
before your ass gets in that seat
Hi, I’m Ricky, the vessel of Barbara
she wants me to go outside
during a strong wind
fly like Mary Poppins
but opening up umbrella in direction of the wind
I guarantee I won’t fly up
so I call her a liar
because I know I’m only gonna go sidewards
Back to the Biden pen commercial
he says
“I tried several times to put the pen
inside my jacket but in the end
it fuck it, like me, put it in your pocket.”
😎🤜🤛
Noble_Incubus said:
Hundreds of hours of live TV coverage and dozens of court rulings support my account of what happened. There is overwhelming evidence that:
Claiming overwhelming evidence is not carrying the burden of proof.
* The 2020 election was not stolen.
* Trump incited violence.
* Trump supporters responded to Trump’s incitement.
What there is zero evidence of is: a grand left wing conspiracy. It is a lie.
You are delusional. Sorry, man. As hysterical as you sound, I don’t want to believe you are intentionally misrepresenting the facts.
That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.
https://apple.news/Ay977w1_BSce_HejZlmxtRQ
EdibleWords said:
You are delusional. Sorry, man. As hysterical as you sound, I don’t want to believe you are intentionally misrepresenting the facts.
https://apple.news/Ay977w1_BSce_HejZlmxtRQ
Yet another misleading post from EdibleWords.
And a link with no context or explanation. What are you attempting to demonstrate with that?
You are delusional. Sorry, man. As hysterical as you sound, I don’t want to believe you are intentionally misrepresenting the facts.
https://apple.news/Ay977w1_BSce_HejZlmxtRQ
Yet another misleading post from EdibleWords.
And a link with no context or explanation. What are you attempting to demonstrate with that?
Noble_Incubus said:
Yet another misleading post from EdibleWords.
And a link with no context or explanation. What are you attempting to demonstrate with that?
Just the same thing Hillary was in 2016. Only I have the confessions of this multitude in the article. They changed laws, information distribution. What more do you need to see? There is so much more we could cover, but this is not the thread for that.
Here you can’t get past the idea that I’m trying to confuse you rather than discuss freedom of speech. So let’s just keep at it, shall we?
EdibleWords said:
https://apple.news/Ay977w1_BSce_HejZlmxtRQ
Just the same thing Hillary was in 2016. Only I have the confessions of this multitude in the article. They changed laws, information distribution. What more do you need to see? There is so much more we could cover, but this is not the thread for that.
Here you can’t get past the idea that I’m trying to confuse you rather than discuss freedom of speech. So let’s just keep at it, shall we?
Okay, the link you provided is a very different narrative to before. I’m going to assume this means you have changed your path, good for you, you have my admiration and respect. I look forward to more enjoyable conversations with you in the future.
Cheers.
https://apple.news/Ay977w1_BSce_HejZlmxtRQ
Just the same thing Hillary was in 2016. Only I have the confessions of this multitude in the article. They changed laws, information distribution. What more do you need to see? There is so much more we could cover, but this is not the thread for that.
Here you can’t get past the idea that I’m trying to confuse you rather than discuss freedom of speech. So let’s just keep at it, shall we?
Okay, the link you provided is a very different narrative to before. I’m going to assume this means you have changed your path, good for you, you have my admiration and respect. I look forward to more enjoyable conversations with you in the future.
Cheers.
Noble_Incubus said:
Okay, the link you provided is a very different narrative to before. I’m going to assume this means you have changed your path, good for you, you have my admiration and respect. I look forward to more enjoyable conversations with you in the future.
Cheers.
I’m not siding with the nut who wrote the article. That thing is a confession of election tampering. It’s chock full of illiberal bias. Like the following quote;
They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.
Only a bunch of biased tools would try to redefine a crime this way.
It’s called “election interference” and they didn’t legally change laws. As you will soon see, they have violated the constitution. But you won’t see because I show you. (I could be wrong, but I don’t think you have the capacity for that) saying - wait for it - this thing isn’t over at all!
Prepare to see Biden removed from a position he never should have held.
This thread I link to below has been shadow-cancelled - a great example of my complaint about my concerns with conversation leaving the normal safe turf of yesteryear. Thankfully it’s low key suppression.
https://deepundergroundpoetry.com/forum/speakeasy/read/11760/#521183
Maybe a mod could un-suppress it, since I’m harmless - as is normal conversation about stolen elections.
https://deepundergroundpoetry.com/forum/speakeasy/read/11760/#521183
Maybe a mod could un-suppress it, since I’m harmless - as is normal conversation about stolen elections.
EdibleWords said:
https://apple.news/Ay977w1_BSce_HejZlmxtRQ
There were no court rulings only dismissals WITHOUT reviewing any evidence.
So if the 2020 election interference story is a lie..then is the four years of democrats stated the 2016 election was stolen, a lie too????
https://apple.news/Ay977w1_BSce_HejZlmxtRQ
There were no court rulings only dismissals WITHOUT reviewing any evidence.
So if the 2020 election interference story is a lie..then is the four years of democrats stated the 2016 election was stolen, a lie too????
EdibleWords said:This thread I link to below has been shadow-cancelled - a great example of my complaint about my concerns with conversation leaving the normal safe turf of yesteryear. Thankfully it’s low key suppression.
https://deepundergroundpoetry.com/forum/speakeasy/read/11760/#521183
Maybe a mod could un-suppress it, since I’m harmless - as is normal conversation about stolen elections.
Truth must be suppressed so that leftist dogma can remain ... Apparently DUP is no different. Selective editing is now a required course in commie college, it seems...
https://deepundergroundpoetry.com/forum/speakeasy/read/11760/#521183
Maybe a mod could un-suppress it, since I’m harmless - as is normal conversation about stolen elections.
Truth must be suppressed so that leftist dogma can remain ... Apparently DUP is no different. Selective editing is now a required course in commie college, it seems...
runaway-mindtrain said:
There were no court rulings only dismissals WITHOUT reviewing any evidence.
So if the 2020 election interference story is a lie..then is the four years of democrats stated the 2016 election was stolen, a lie too????
Without a double-standard, what standards would they have???
There are so many irregularities, all pointing to the same interfering forces working in secrecy to hide evidence and damning truths, etc, etc.... that if it did come to court properly (the judges had no chance, btw, how Giuliani handled it, to even address the evidence) that they would have had, beyond a reasonable doubt, enough evidence.
Men have been convicted of murder with less evidence to show.
There were no court rulings only dismissals WITHOUT reviewing any evidence.
So if the 2020 election interference story is a lie..then is the four years of democrats stated the 2016 election was stolen, a lie too????
Without a double-standard, what standards would they have???
There are so many irregularities, all pointing to the same interfering forces working in secrecy to hide evidence and damning truths, etc, etc.... that if it did come to court properly (the judges had no chance, btw, how Giuliani handled it, to even address the evidence) that they would have had, beyond a reasonable doubt, enough evidence.
Men have been convicted of murder with less evidence to show.
runaway-mindtrain said:
Truth must be suppressed so that leftist dogma can remain ... Apparently DUP is no different. Selective editing is now a required course in commie college, it seems...
But Ahavati claims I neglect threads because they don’t get attention because people don’t want to participate, not because they are suppressed... 🙄
😆inadvertently they are helping her build a false narrative against me. I’m sure that had nothing to do with their intentions, but still. Not a good look. 🤡
Truth must be suppressed so that leftist dogma can remain ... Apparently DUP is no different. Selective editing is now a required course in commie college, it seems...
But Ahavati claims I neglect threads because they don’t get attention because people don’t want to participate, not because they are suppressed... 🙄
😆inadvertently they are helping her build a false narrative against me. I’m sure that had nothing to do with their intentions, but still. Not a good look. 🤡
EdibleWords said:
But Ahavati claims I neglect threads because they don’t get attention because people don’t want to participate, not because they are suppressed... 🙄
😆inadvertently they are helping her build a false narrative against me. I’m sure that had nothing to do with their intentions, but still. Not a good look. 🤡
False narrative....
Yes...like for instance the....
"My body my choice" used by pro abortion advocates.
"It is my body, thus my property...I can keep it or kill it. It is my decision"...
The same argument used by slave owners against abolition....
But Ahavati claims I neglect threads because they don’t get attention because people don’t want to participate, not because they are suppressed... 🙄
😆inadvertently they are helping her build a false narrative against me. I’m sure that had nothing to do with their intentions, but still. Not a good look. 🤡
False narrative....
Yes...like for instance the....
"My body my choice" used by pro abortion advocates.
"It is my body, thus my property...I can keep it or kill it. It is my decision"...
The same argument used by slave owners against abolition....
