Corona Time
Skeptical Enquirers take on the three catagories of 911 theorists. Highly relevant to conspiracy theorists in general.
Dissecting the 9/11 Truth movement community
According to a 2011 analysis in a Skeptical Inquirer article, people involved in this movement, which seemingly is a disparate group with very diversified backgrounds, could be classified into three groups. They join the movement for different reasons, loosely self-assemble to fill different roles and are united by their shared mistrust in experts and the establishment (government and reputable sources of knowledge), and conspiratorial stance. Through their engagement, they each find their own fulfillment and satisfaction. Together, they contribute to the persistence, resilience and exaggerated claims of acceptance (in general public) of the movement. These three groups are:[210]
Hard Core: The organizers and active members of the various 9/11 Truth Movement organizations. They produce the information, spot the anomalies and technical inconsistencies, provide the technical base and form the theories. While they claim to be only interested in facts and to use scientific method, they commit the logical fallacy of 'confirmation bias' by pre-determining the outcome, then searching for corroborating evidence while ignoring the vast body of peer-reviewed, independent, consensual research which contradict their theories. They supply the physical structure of the movement by organizing events, seminars, discussions, marches and distributing flyers and pamphlets. Their numbers are relatively small but they are tight-knit and highly connected. Their worldview favors 'super-conspiracy', a master plan that is behind conspiracies which they believe they are uncovering.[210]
Critically turned: They are the young students and political activists whose affiliation with the 9/11 Truth Movement often is rooted from their dissatisfaction and anger at the established political and social order. Their sense of justice and idealism propels them to activism against perceived oppression and social injustice. Their penchant to use Internet, especially social media, and tech savvy make them the propaganda machine for the movement. They produce YouTube videos and films with cool, countercultural content, make good use of pop culture parody and eye-catching graphics. The countercultural street cred of their productions buy them broad appeal and exposure to millions of people.[210]
Illiterati: They are the movement's mass membership backbone, a large, diffuse group which give the movement exaggerated claims of popularity and influence. Participation in the 9/11 Truth Movement, to this group of people, is as much a social and recreational pursuit as the quest for truth. Their partaking is mostly through web 2.0 social networking and YouTube. Their commentaries often are emotional and they make no pretense to be accurate, balanced or to show genuine intent to find truth. Involvement with the movement that fit their worldview gives them a sense of identity and belonging, which they find more appealing than the facts and evidences of the 9/11 terrorist attack itself.[210]
Dissecting the 9/11 Truth movement community
According to a 2011 analysis in a Skeptical Inquirer article, people involved in this movement, which seemingly is a disparate group with very diversified backgrounds, could be classified into three groups. They join the movement for different reasons, loosely self-assemble to fill different roles and are united by their shared mistrust in experts and the establishment (government and reputable sources of knowledge), and conspiratorial stance. Through their engagement, they each find their own fulfillment and satisfaction. Together, they contribute to the persistence, resilience and exaggerated claims of acceptance (in general public) of the movement. These three groups are:[210]
Hard Core: The organizers and active members of the various 9/11 Truth Movement organizations. They produce the information, spot the anomalies and technical inconsistencies, provide the technical base and form the theories. While they claim to be only interested in facts and to use scientific method, they commit the logical fallacy of 'confirmation bias' by pre-determining the outcome, then searching for corroborating evidence while ignoring the vast body of peer-reviewed, independent, consensual research which contradict their theories. They supply the physical structure of the movement by organizing events, seminars, discussions, marches and distributing flyers and pamphlets. Their numbers are relatively small but they are tight-knit and highly connected. Their worldview favors 'super-conspiracy', a master plan that is behind conspiracies which they believe they are uncovering.[210]
Critically turned: They are the young students and political activists whose affiliation with the 9/11 Truth Movement often is rooted from their dissatisfaction and anger at the established political and social order. Their sense of justice and idealism propels them to activism against perceived oppression and social injustice. Their penchant to use Internet, especially social media, and tech savvy make them the propaganda machine for the movement. They produce YouTube videos and films with cool, countercultural content, make good use of pop culture parody and eye-catching graphics. The countercultural street cred of their productions buy them broad appeal and exposure to millions of people.[210]
Illiterati: They are the movement's mass membership backbone, a large, diffuse group which give the movement exaggerated claims of popularity and influence. Participation in the 9/11 Truth Movement, to this group of people, is as much a social and recreational pursuit as the quest for truth. Their partaking is mostly through web 2.0 social networking and YouTube. Their commentaries often are emotional and they make no pretense to be accurate, balanced or to show genuine intent to find truth. Involvement with the movement that fit their worldview gives them a sense of identity and belonging, which they find more appealing than the facts and evidences of the 9/11 terrorist attack itself.[210]
Fun stats
Current projected cost of Covid 19 to US economy: 1 trillion dollars
Cost of the Iraq war for the US: 6.4 Trillion dollars
Money for war..."hey, no problems...always got money for freedom"
Money to help its own citizens..."shit, I don't know man. I think maybe lots of you have to go broke and/or die"
Now 'that's' a conspiracy!
Current projected cost of Covid 19 to US economy: 1 trillion dollars
Cost of the Iraq war for the US: 6.4 Trillion dollars
Money for war..."hey, no problems...always got money for freedom"
Money to help its own citizens..."shit, I don't know man. I think maybe lots of you have to go broke and/or die"
Now 'that's' a conspiracy!
Anonymous
hemihead said:Fun stats
Current projected cost of Covid 19 to US economy: 1 trillion dollars
Cost of the Iraq war for the US: 6.4 Trillion dollars
Money for war..."hey, no problems...always got money for freedom"
Money to help its own citizens..."shit, I don't know man. I think maybe lots of you have to go broke and/or die"
Now 'that's' a conspiracy!
The dark humour in this statement alone was enough to make me laugh and then reflect on a few things
Current projected cost of Covid 19 to US economy: 1 trillion dollars
Cost of the Iraq war for the US: 6.4 Trillion dollars
Money for war..."hey, no problems...always got money for freedom"
Money to help its own citizens..."shit, I don't know man. I think maybe lots of you have to go broke and/or die"
Now 'that's' a conspiracy!
The dark humour in this statement alone was enough to make me laugh and then reflect on a few things
A pioneering study by Greek scientists at the Hellenic Pasteur Institute (EIP), in collaboration with Athens University Medical School Professor of epidemiology, Sotiris Tsiodras, has been conducted recently and its full findings are expected to be published in the near future.
The researchers have already submitted their results and are awaiting publication in the acclaimed scientific periodical called the Journal of Clinical Virology.
The study aims to form a fuller understanding of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, the novel virus which has caused such chaos across the globe in recent months, including how it may mutate.
According to initial information published by the researchers, the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus demonstrates significant genomic diversity and plasticity within its hosts and has regions in its genome which are prone to genomic alterations, or mutations — including a potential recombination hotspot.
Researchers analyzed NGS data derived from clinical samples from three Chinese patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, in order to identify small and large-scale intra-host variations in the viral genome.
They identified tens of low — and higher — frequency single nucleotide variations (SNVs) with variable density across the viral genome, affecting 7 out of 10 protein-coding viral genes.
NOTICE THAT WORD FREQUENCY I KEEP THINKING OF G5
The majority of these SNVs corresponded to missense changes, which are alterations in one amino acid in a protein, arising from a point mutation in a single nucleotide.
The annotation of the identified SNVs in addition to all currently circulating strain variations revealed co-localization of not only intra-host but also strain-specific SNVs, with primers and probes currently used in molecular diagnostics assays.
The bioinformatics analysis conducted by the scientists disclosed genomic rearrangements over poly-A and poly-U regions located in ORF1ab and spike (S) gene, including a potential recombination hot-spot within the S gene.
Despite this scientific jargon, which of course is not completely understood by the ordinary person, the study conducted by the Greek scientists aims to build upon humanity’s current efforts to understand and finally manage to beat the novel coronavirus, which has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives
The researchers have already submitted their results and are awaiting publication in the acclaimed scientific periodical called the Journal of Clinical Virology.
The study aims to form a fuller understanding of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, the novel virus which has caused such chaos across the globe in recent months, including how it may mutate.
According to initial information published by the researchers, the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus demonstrates significant genomic diversity and plasticity within its hosts and has regions in its genome which are prone to genomic alterations, or mutations — including a potential recombination hotspot.
Researchers analyzed NGS data derived from clinical samples from three Chinese patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, in order to identify small and large-scale intra-host variations in the viral genome.
They identified tens of low — and higher — frequency single nucleotide variations (SNVs) with variable density across the viral genome, affecting 7 out of 10 protein-coding viral genes.
NOTICE THAT WORD FREQUENCY I KEEP THINKING OF G5
The majority of these SNVs corresponded to missense changes, which are alterations in one amino acid in a protein, arising from a point mutation in a single nucleotide.
The annotation of the identified SNVs in addition to all currently circulating strain variations revealed co-localization of not only intra-host but also strain-specific SNVs, with primers and probes currently used in molecular diagnostics assays.
The bioinformatics analysis conducted by the scientists disclosed genomic rearrangements over poly-A and poly-U regions located in ORF1ab and spike (S) gene, including a potential recombination hot-spot within the S gene.
Despite this scientific jargon, which of course is not completely understood by the ordinary person, the study conducted by the Greek scientists aims to build upon humanity’s current efforts to understand and finally manage to beat the novel coronavirus, which has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives
Is the CDC Losing Control?
The country’s flagship public-health agency is facing internal scandal and funding issues that will test its ability to respond to outbreaks on the horizon.
Vann R. Newkirk II
February 3, 2018
Former CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald, who resigned Wednesday after a report revealed she once had holdings in several tobacco companiesDavid Tulis / AP
Link Copied
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was created, quite literally, to drain the swamp. In the not-so-far-off past, much of the southeastern United States was a malarial mess, with disease-carrying mosquitoes multiplying in the heat and moisture of the agricultural lowlands and wetlands that dominate the region. Before America became a superpower, the major threats to life and liberty weren’t terrorism or nuclear annihilation, but the annual scourge of fever diseases. When the CDC’s predecessor, the Office of Malaria Control in War Areas, was created in 1942, its mission was to knock down the remaining barriers to personal freedom these illnesses imposed. Or, to drain them.
Seventy-five years later, malaria and yellow fever have been all but eliminated in the continental United States. The morbidity and mortality burden for the worst infectious diseases has fallen tremendously over the last century, and average life expectancy has increased by over 10 years since 1942. At the center of it all is the CDC, now a major piece of both the public-health and national-security apparatuses, and a relative constant in times of great change. But as 2017 showed, few institutions are truly immune to the political upheaval the Trump administration brought to Washington—and now the stalwart CDC finds itself sinking into the swamp.
To say the agency has taken a step back in Trump’s first year would be an understatement. On Wednesday, the new secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, announced the resignation of CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald, citing “complex financial interests that have imposed a broad recusal limiting her ability to complete all her duties.” According to a recent report from Politico, some of those holdings included eyebrow-raising investments in companies directly related to Fitzgerald’s work, including thousands of dollars in drug and insurance companies.
Close ties with these industries aren’t unusual among Trump administration officials: Former Health Secretary Tom Price had stock in biotech and pharmaceuticals companies, and Azar is a former executive with pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly. But Fitzgerald’s financial activity went even beyond this new norm. Politico reported that she’d held stock in tobacco companies Reynolds American, British American Tobacco, Imperial Brands, Philip Morris International, and Altria Group before she took office in July. As director, she purchased over $1,000 worth of stock in Japan Tobacco. That means that before she dumped the stocks in October, Fitzgerald held ownership in four of the “Big Five” tobacco companies in the world.
Now, there are no accusations of wrongdoing against Fitzgerald—no indication her stake made a difference in her leadership—and it’s unclear if she was aware of the stock purchases made in her name. But even the most generous interpretation for Fitzgerald is a scandal for the CDC. One of the centers’ chief public-health objectives is to end smoking. In fact, the only real public-health position on tobacco usage is that it should be eliminated entirely, a line that the CDC has held for years now. The CDC’s chief holding even a penny of tobacco stock, let alone a portfolio that includes almost all the major companies, runs counter to that goal.
This particular fiasco comes during a time when the agency is facing a growing number of public-health threats. Smoking rates have dipped significantly in the past year, but the disparities in smoking rates between rich and poor have actually increased—differences that threaten to further entrench income inequality. Antibiotic resistance is on the rise, and more than likely portends a new wave of infectious threats that will test the American public-health system, including the imminent threat of a resurgence of sexually-transmitted diseases. The country is in the grip of one of the worst flu seasons in years, and the unprecedented opioid crisis decreasing the lifespans of millions of Americans shows no signs of relenting.
Facing that rising tide, the mothership of the country’s public-health system is floundering, in no small part because of a Republican effort to reduce its funding. In 2017, the GOP’s attempts to repeal Obamacare often proposed raiding or eliminating the Prevention and Public Health Fund, which constitutes a major piece of the CDC’s budget. While repeal never passed, it put CDC on the defensive, where it’s likely to remain: Trump has also targeted the fund for cuts.
What’s more, facing a loss of funding for its international infectious-disease efforts—there appear to be “no new resources” on the horizon—the agency is set to cut back its global health-security program by as much as 80 percent. In a hotter, more connected world, when global pandemic seems all the more likely, the CDC is shrinking from the world.
Paradoxically, the failure of global diseases like Ebola and Zika to establish beachheads in the United States after sustained panics has often been used as rationale for pulling the agency back and slashing its proactive public-health funds. But renewed austerity, along with controversy in leadership, could set the CDC up for failure precisely at the moment when it is needed most.
The country’s flagship public-health agency is facing internal scandal and funding issues that will test its ability to respond to outbreaks on the horizon.
Vann R. Newkirk II
February 3, 2018
Former CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald, who resigned Wednesday after a report revealed she once had holdings in several tobacco companiesDavid Tulis / AP
Link Copied
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was created, quite literally, to drain the swamp. In the not-so-far-off past, much of the southeastern United States was a malarial mess, with disease-carrying mosquitoes multiplying in the heat and moisture of the agricultural lowlands and wetlands that dominate the region. Before America became a superpower, the major threats to life and liberty weren’t terrorism or nuclear annihilation, but the annual scourge of fever diseases. When the CDC’s predecessor, the Office of Malaria Control in War Areas, was created in 1942, its mission was to knock down the remaining barriers to personal freedom these illnesses imposed. Or, to drain them.
Seventy-five years later, malaria and yellow fever have been all but eliminated in the continental United States. The morbidity and mortality burden for the worst infectious diseases has fallen tremendously over the last century, and average life expectancy has increased by over 10 years since 1942. At the center of it all is the CDC, now a major piece of both the public-health and national-security apparatuses, and a relative constant in times of great change. But as 2017 showed, few institutions are truly immune to the political upheaval the Trump administration brought to Washington—and now the stalwart CDC finds itself sinking into the swamp.
To say the agency has taken a step back in Trump’s first year would be an understatement. On Wednesday, the new secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, announced the resignation of CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald, citing “complex financial interests that have imposed a broad recusal limiting her ability to complete all her duties.” According to a recent report from Politico, some of those holdings included eyebrow-raising investments in companies directly related to Fitzgerald’s work, including thousands of dollars in drug and insurance companies.
Close ties with these industries aren’t unusual among Trump administration officials: Former Health Secretary Tom Price had stock in biotech and pharmaceuticals companies, and Azar is a former executive with pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly. But Fitzgerald’s financial activity went even beyond this new norm. Politico reported that she’d held stock in tobacco companies Reynolds American, British American Tobacco, Imperial Brands, Philip Morris International, and Altria Group before she took office in July. As director, she purchased over $1,000 worth of stock in Japan Tobacco. That means that before she dumped the stocks in October, Fitzgerald held ownership in four of the “Big Five” tobacco companies in the world.
Now, there are no accusations of wrongdoing against Fitzgerald—no indication her stake made a difference in her leadership—and it’s unclear if she was aware of the stock purchases made in her name. But even the most generous interpretation for Fitzgerald is a scandal for the CDC. One of the centers’ chief public-health objectives is to end smoking. In fact, the only real public-health position on tobacco usage is that it should be eliminated entirely, a line that the CDC has held for years now. The CDC’s chief holding even a penny of tobacco stock, let alone a portfolio that includes almost all the major companies, runs counter to that goal.
This particular fiasco comes during a time when the agency is facing a growing number of public-health threats. Smoking rates have dipped significantly in the past year, but the disparities in smoking rates between rich and poor have actually increased—differences that threaten to further entrench income inequality. Antibiotic resistance is on the rise, and more than likely portends a new wave of infectious threats that will test the American public-health system, including the imminent threat of a resurgence of sexually-transmitted diseases. The country is in the grip of one of the worst flu seasons in years, and the unprecedented opioid crisis decreasing the lifespans of millions of Americans shows no signs of relenting.
Facing that rising tide, the mothership of the country’s public-health system is floundering, in no small part because of a Republican effort to reduce its funding. In 2017, the GOP’s attempts to repeal Obamacare often proposed raiding or eliminating the Prevention and Public Health Fund, which constitutes a major piece of the CDC’s budget. While repeal never passed, it put CDC on the defensive, where it’s likely to remain: Trump has also targeted the fund for cuts.
What’s more, facing a loss of funding for its international infectious-disease efforts—there appear to be “no new resources” on the horizon—the agency is set to cut back its global health-security program by as much as 80 percent. In a hotter, more connected world, when global pandemic seems all the more likely, the CDC is shrinking from the world.
Paradoxically, the failure of global diseases like Ebola and Zika to establish beachheads in the United States after sustained panics has often been used as rationale for pulling the agency back and slashing its proactive public-health funds. But renewed austerity, along with controversy in leadership, could set the CDC up for failure precisely at the moment when it is needed most.
hemihead said:Skeptical Enquirers take on the three catagories of 911 theorists. Highly relevant to conspiracy theorists in general.
Dissecting the 9/11 Truth movement community
According to a 2011 analysis in a Skeptical Inquirer article, people involved in this movement, which seemingly is a disparate group with very diversified backgrounds, could be classified into three groups. They join the movement for different reasons, loosely self-assemble to fill different roles and are united by their shared mistrust in experts and the establishment (government and reputable sources of knowledge), and conspiratorial stance. Through their engagement, they each find their own fulfillment and satisfaction. Together, they contribute to the persistence, resilience and exaggerated claims of acceptance (in general public) of the movement. These three groups are:[210]
Hard Core: The organizers and active members of the various 9/11 Truth Movement organizations. They produce the information, spot the anomalies and technical inconsistencies, provide the technical base and form the theories. While they claim to be only interested in facts and to use scientific method, they commit the logical fallacy of 'confirmation bias' by pre-determining the outcome, then searching for corroborating evidence while ignoring the vast body of peer-reviewed, independent, consensual research which contradict their theories. They supply the physical structure of the movement by organizing events, seminars, discussions, marches and distributing flyers and pamphlets. Their numbers are relatively small but they are tight-knit and highly connected. Their worldview favors 'super-conspiracy', a master plan that is behind conspiracies which they believe they are uncovering.[210]
Critically turned: They are the young students and political activists whose affiliation with the 9/11 Truth Movement often is rooted from their dissatisfaction and anger at the established political and social order. Their sense of justice and idealism propels them to activism against perceived oppression and social injustice. Their penchant to use Internet, especially social media, and tech savvy make them the propaganda machine for the movement. They produce YouTube videos and films with cool, countercultural content, make good use of pop culture parody and eye-catching graphics. The countercultural street cred of their productions buy them broad appeal and exposure to millions of people.[210]
Illiterati: They are the movement's mass membership backbone, a large, diffuse group which give the movement exaggerated claims of popularity and influence. Participation in the 9/11 Truth Movement, to this group of people, is as much a social and recreational pursuit as the quest for truth. Their partaking is mostly through web 2.0 social networking and YouTube. Their commentaries often are emotional and they make no pretense to be accurate, balanced or to show genuine intent to find truth. Involvement with the movement that fit their worldview gives them a sense of identity and belonging, which they find more appealing than the facts and evidences of the 9/11 terrorist attack itself.[210]
✈️#911Truth Part 15: Feature Presentation: The Dawn of a New Age by Dr. Judy Wood
Dissecting the 9/11 Truth movement community
According to a 2011 analysis in a Skeptical Inquirer article, people involved in this movement, which seemingly is a disparate group with very diversified backgrounds, could be classified into three groups. They join the movement for different reasons, loosely self-assemble to fill different roles and are united by their shared mistrust in experts and the establishment (government and reputable sources of knowledge), and conspiratorial stance. Through their engagement, they each find their own fulfillment and satisfaction. Together, they contribute to the persistence, resilience and exaggerated claims of acceptance (in general public) of the movement. These three groups are:[210]
Hard Core: The organizers and active members of the various 9/11 Truth Movement organizations. They produce the information, spot the anomalies and technical inconsistencies, provide the technical base and form the theories. While they claim to be only interested in facts and to use scientific method, they commit the logical fallacy of 'confirmation bias' by pre-determining the outcome, then searching for corroborating evidence while ignoring the vast body of peer-reviewed, independent, consensual research which contradict their theories. They supply the physical structure of the movement by organizing events, seminars, discussions, marches and distributing flyers and pamphlets. Their numbers are relatively small but they are tight-knit and highly connected. Their worldview favors 'super-conspiracy', a master plan that is behind conspiracies which they believe they are uncovering.[210]
Critically turned: They are the young students and political activists whose affiliation with the 9/11 Truth Movement often is rooted from their dissatisfaction and anger at the established political and social order. Their sense of justice and idealism propels them to activism against perceived oppression and social injustice. Their penchant to use Internet, especially social media, and tech savvy make them the propaganda machine for the movement. They produce YouTube videos and films with cool, countercultural content, make good use of pop culture parody and eye-catching graphics. The countercultural street cred of their productions buy them broad appeal and exposure to millions of people.[210]
Illiterati: They are the movement's mass membership backbone, a large, diffuse group which give the movement exaggerated claims of popularity and influence. Participation in the 9/11 Truth Movement, to this group of people, is as much a social and recreational pursuit as the quest for truth. Their partaking is mostly through web 2.0 social networking and YouTube. Their commentaries often are emotional and they make no pretense to be accurate, balanced or to show genuine intent to find truth. Involvement with the movement that fit their worldview gives them a sense of identity and belonging, which they find more appealing than the facts and evidences of the 9/11 terrorist attack itself.[210]
✈️#911Truth Part 15: Feature Presentation: The Dawn of a New Age by Dr. Judy Wood
drone said:✈️#911Truth Part 15: Feature Presentation: The Dawn of a New Age by Dr. Judy Wood
“Space lasers shot the towers down”.
So discredited she was removed from Wikipedia.
So deluded she never worked again.
So mistaken that her theory of “dustification” ignores the basic fact that all the structural steel was removed, and weighed and examined. Her direct energy weapon hypothesis requires it to have been vaporised, yet there it all is.
So baseless her attempts to sue were denied by several courts, and eventually a judge fined her lawyers for bringing frivolous lawsuits.
So poorly researched that she never considered the amount of energy you would need to generate and store and then transmit to instantly dustify a building, let alone the size of of the transmitter it would require. Too heavy for either one to hide, fit in an aircraft, or redeploy. And that’s without thinking of a power supply that could recharge within seconds to fire again.
So determined to find evidence to support her claims that she never spoke to other experts in their fields, and do speculated on things that are easy to explain. The low seismic signal of the event is a case in point. It is immediately obvious that since the buildings themselves are designed as dampers to prevent cyclic wind loading damage, they would have very nicely damped the shock loads of the aircraft hitting, reducing the seismic footprint of that impact at ground level.
So completely lost in her theory it never occurred to her to meet and question the thousands of eye witnesses who literally saw an aircraft fly in to a building.
I genuinely for sad for this woman. Something went wrong, and now her legacy is this.
“Space lasers shot the towers down”.
So discredited she was removed from Wikipedia.
So deluded she never worked again.
So mistaken that her theory of “dustification” ignores the basic fact that all the structural steel was removed, and weighed and examined. Her direct energy weapon hypothesis requires it to have been vaporised, yet there it all is.
So baseless her attempts to sue were denied by several courts, and eventually a judge fined her lawyers for bringing frivolous lawsuits.
So poorly researched that she never considered the amount of energy you would need to generate and store and then transmit to instantly dustify a building, let alone the size of of the transmitter it would require. Too heavy for either one to hide, fit in an aircraft, or redeploy. And that’s without thinking of a power supply that could recharge within seconds to fire again.
So determined to find evidence to support her claims that she never spoke to other experts in their fields, and do speculated on things that are easy to explain. The low seismic signal of the event is a case in point. It is immediately obvious that since the buildings themselves are designed as dampers to prevent cyclic wind loading damage, they would have very nicely damped the shock loads of the aircraft hitting, reducing the seismic footprint of that impact at ground level.
So completely lost in her theory it never occurred to her to meet and question the thousands of eye witnesses who literally saw an aircraft fly in to a building.
I genuinely for sad for this woman. Something went wrong, and now her legacy is this.
https://youtu.be/W95tnotcd5A
Another MD Dr Sherri Tenpenny weighs in on this plandemic.
She mentions the CDC being privatly owned, the CDCs labelling of COVID-19 deaths. She even mentions this 6ft distancing is not even tested just something they came up with.
https://vaxxter.com/
Scientific articles exposing vaccine myths and pharma foibles.
https://youtu.be/8KohYmHN-N8
A message to soldiers and law enforcement.
Another MD Dr Sherri Tenpenny weighs in on this plandemic.
She mentions the CDC being privatly owned, the CDCs labelling of COVID-19 deaths. She even mentions this 6ft distancing is not even tested just something they came up with.
https://vaxxter.com/
Scientific articles exposing vaccine myths and pharma foibles.
https://youtu.be/8KohYmHN-N8
A message to soldiers and law enforcement.
https://youtu.be/NXX2ZFNBUdc
Trump is no longer in control of the US (if he ever was) he has handed control over to FEMA
Trump is no longer in control of the US (if he ever was) he has handed control over to FEMA
https://youtu.be/WzUHMSETA9k
Bill Gates exposed
Bill Gates exposed
hemihead said:
“Space lasers shot the towers down”.
So discredited she was removed from Wikipedia.
So deluded she never worked again.
So mistaken that her theory of “dustification” ignores the basic fact that all the structural steel was removed, and weighed and examined. Her direct energy weapon hypothesis requires it to have been vaporised, yet there it all is.
So baseless her attempts to sue were denied by several courts, and eventually a judge fined her lawyers for bringing frivolous lawsuits.
So poorly researched that she never considered the amount of energy you would need to generate and store and then transmit to instantly dustify a building, let alone the size of of the transmitter it would require. Too heavy for either one to hide, fit in an aircraft, or redeploy. And that’s without thinking of a power supply that could recharge within seconds to fire again.
So determined to find evidence to support her claims that she never spoke to other experts in their fields, and do speculated on things that are easy to explain. The low seismic signal of the event is a case in point. It is immediately obvious that since the buildings themselves are designed as dampers to prevent cyclic wind loading damage, they would have very nicely damped the shock loads of the aircraft hitting, reducing the seismic footprint of that impact at ground level.
So completely lost in her theory it never occurred to her to meet and question the thousands of eye witnesses who literally saw an aircraft fly in to a building.
I genuinely for sad for this woman. Something went wrong, and now her legacy is this.
Space lasers shot the towers down”.
did she say that
So discredited she was removed from Wikipedia.
honest and truthful is Wikipedia
not one blemish on their track record
Amazing er
So deluded she never worked again.
who holds the purse strings
for funding
TAKE A wild guess
IT IS SO SAD
people
such as your self
are soo frightened
TO LOOK AT
TO LISTEN
at the for and against
to ask the question
WHY
is there no open
honest
PUBLIC
debate
between these scientists
who have the same
pieces of paper
nailed to their wall
after all
this is such a serious matter
NOT ALLOWED
why is that
A little strange
don't you think
OH sorry
I forgot you don't
this is not a guess
it's a fact
10.35 I posted
11.15 you posted
YOU DIDN'T
LISTEN
SOOO SAD
you went to your best friend
Wikipedia.one of your holy grails
Some have walls
that are low
some have walls
that are high
some believe
they don't have any
until
logical reasoning
bites the hand
of ignorant arrogant
superiority
that's ALWAYS
inviting
the weak willed
and the lost
to believe
your desperate need
to be believed
and your base line
of finding the facts
are sites
like Wikipedia
MAN
I know children
who can do better
YOU could try
asking a seagull
hahaha
The low seismic signal of the event is a case in point. It is immediately obvious that since the buildings themselves are designed as dampers to prevent cyclic wind loading damage, they would have very nicely damped the shock loads of the aircraft hitting, reducing the seismic footprint of that impact at ground level.
ER HALF A MILLION TONNES of concrete
er Gravity
seismic footprint of that impact at ground level.
would be noticed
It is immediately obvious
THAT you love being spoon fed
so sad
PS I would suggest
if you want to be
a little more believable
LOOK
at the time on the posts
DER
“Space lasers shot the towers down”.
So discredited she was removed from Wikipedia.
So deluded she never worked again.
So mistaken that her theory of “dustification” ignores the basic fact that all the structural steel was removed, and weighed and examined. Her direct energy weapon hypothesis requires it to have been vaporised, yet there it all is.
So baseless her attempts to sue were denied by several courts, and eventually a judge fined her lawyers for bringing frivolous lawsuits.
So poorly researched that she never considered the amount of energy you would need to generate and store and then transmit to instantly dustify a building, let alone the size of of the transmitter it would require. Too heavy for either one to hide, fit in an aircraft, or redeploy. And that’s without thinking of a power supply that could recharge within seconds to fire again.
So determined to find evidence to support her claims that she never spoke to other experts in their fields, and do speculated on things that are easy to explain. The low seismic signal of the event is a case in point. It is immediately obvious that since the buildings themselves are designed as dampers to prevent cyclic wind loading damage, they would have very nicely damped the shock loads of the aircraft hitting, reducing the seismic footprint of that impact at ground level.
So completely lost in her theory it never occurred to her to meet and question the thousands of eye witnesses who literally saw an aircraft fly in to a building.
I genuinely for sad for this woman. Something went wrong, and now her legacy is this.
Space lasers shot the towers down”.
did she say that
So discredited she was removed from Wikipedia.
honest and truthful is Wikipedia
not one blemish on their track record
Amazing er
So deluded she never worked again.
who holds the purse strings
for funding
TAKE A wild guess
IT IS SO SAD
people
such as your self
are soo frightened
TO LOOK AT
TO LISTEN
at the for and against
to ask the question
WHY
is there no open
honest
PUBLIC
debate
between these scientists
who have the same
pieces of paper
nailed to their wall
after all
this is such a serious matter
NOT ALLOWED
why is that
A little strange
don't you think
OH sorry
I forgot you don't
this is not a guess
it's a fact
10.35 I posted
11.15 you posted
YOU DIDN'T
LISTEN
SOOO SAD
you went to your best friend
Wikipedia.one of your holy grails
Some have walls
that are low
some have walls
that are high
some believe
they don't have any
until
logical reasoning
bites the hand
of ignorant arrogant
superiority
that's ALWAYS
inviting
the weak willed
and the lost
to believe
your desperate need
to be believed
and your base line
of finding the facts
are sites
like Wikipedia
MAN
I know children
who can do better
YOU could try
asking a seagull
hahaha
The low seismic signal of the event is a case in point. It is immediately obvious that since the buildings themselves are designed as dampers to prevent cyclic wind loading damage, they would have very nicely damped the shock loads of the aircraft hitting, reducing the seismic footprint of that impact at ground level.
ER HALF A MILLION TONNES of concrete
er Gravity
seismic footprint of that impact at ground level.
would be noticed
It is immediately obvious
THAT you love being spoon fed
so sad
PS I would suggest
if you want to be
a little more believable
LOOK
at the time on the posts
DER
https://youtu.be/-mclJppuskQ
New proposed laws to jail antivaxers and the CDCs fear based talking points to the media revealed.
New proposed laws to jail antivaxers and the CDCs fear based talking points to the media revealed.
accurdling to Wikipedia, the cawst of the Irate ware was:
The costs of the 2003–2010 Iraq War are often contested, as academics and critics have unearthed many hidden costs not represented in official estimates. The most recent major report on these costs come from Brown University in the form of the Costs of War, which totaled just over $1.1 trillion. The United States Department of Defense's direct spending on Iraq totaled at least $757.8 billion, but also highlighting the complementary costs at home, such as interest paid on the funds borrowed to finance the wars.
The cost of the two point two trillion dollar stimulus package is...
So we can see that our guvment is wiling to spend a couple trillion on a war over seven years,
AND 2.2 trillion for the people over the course of 6 months.
The only problem is that most of that cornholio money actually bails out
corporations, with a few peanuts left over for the stimuls checks:
350 million stimulus checks at 1200 each = 500 billion for the people,
leaving 1500 billion for corporations.
In order to sign the bill, trumpito said that no rescue money can go to the post office, which has seen letter delivery fall by half, and will go out of business in several months.
Trump hates Bezos, and Bezos made a contract with USPS and trump wants the deal cancelled and the post office didn't. Plus, the election is coming up, and it is known that more democrats vote by mail, so killing the post office, in his mind, would help his electcion.
Also trump would not sign the rescue package unless he was the one overseeing how the money was spent on corporations. That means that the ones who were nice to trump get more moeny.
The costs of the 2003–2010 Iraq War are often contested, as academics and critics have unearthed many hidden costs not represented in official estimates. The most recent major report on these costs come from Brown University in the form of the Costs of War, which totaled just over $1.1 trillion. The United States Department of Defense's direct spending on Iraq totaled at least $757.8 billion, but also highlighting the complementary costs at home, such as interest paid on the funds borrowed to finance the wars.
The cost of the two point two trillion dollar stimulus package is...
So we can see that our guvment is wiling to spend a couple trillion on a war over seven years,
AND 2.2 trillion for the people over the course of 6 months.
The only problem is that most of that cornholio money actually bails out
corporations, with a few peanuts left over for the stimuls checks:
350 million stimulus checks at 1200 each = 500 billion for the people,
leaving 1500 billion for corporations.
In order to sign the bill, trumpito said that no rescue money can go to the post office, which has seen letter delivery fall by half, and will go out of business in several months.
Trump hates Bezos, and Bezos made a contract with USPS and trump wants the deal cancelled and the post office didn't. Plus, the election is coming up, and it is known that more democrats vote by mail, so killing the post office, in his mind, would help his electcion.
Also trump would not sign the rescue package unless he was the one overseeing how the money was spent on corporations. That means that the ones who were nice to trump get more moeny.
https://youtu.be/Ns_z_vgbkzI
New info contradicts official outbreak timeline
New info contradicts official outbreak timeline
