deepundergroundpoetry.com
aur ein sof
In the beginning created elohim the heavens and the earth.
In the firey waters above and below
( el ) and ( im ) both willed to know
how might two (be)come as one
in a garden shared under the sun.
The firey Ish of ( el )
(as willfully moving above)
willingly 'wills' to bestow Delight, and
the firey Isha of ( im )
(so willingly resting below)
willfully 'wills' to receive Delight, and
both 'wills' (as) through one (so) Delight(fully) - ( 'oh' )
( el ) - ( 'oh' ) - ( im )
both become an item over 'one'
in a garden shared under the sun.
As surely as 'one'
over 'one',
are 'one'
as surely so are
limits none:
( ein sof )
...less 'one' garden
full of limitless (De)light(s)
wherein elohim produce
(incessantly) the 'light':
And Elohim willed
there to be light,
and light there was.
(... aur ...)
As (above) el is to bestowing
so (below) im is to receiving
and oh is 'shared' between:
"Oh Ish!"..."Oh Isha!"...
"...oh!...Oh!...OH!..."
As Ish bestows (incessantly)
for 'im' (night-and-day)
so Isha receives (incessantly)
from 'el' (day-and-night)
"Oh Ish!"..."Oh Isha!"...
More (light)! More (light)! More (light)!
"Oh Ish!"..."Oh Isha!"...
Delight! Delight! Delight!
(... aur ...)
(... ein sof ...)
Published 27th Apr 2019
| Edited 28th Apr 2019
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 2
reading list entries 0
comments 2
reads 310
Commenting Preference:
The author is looking for friendly feedback.
Anonymous
27th Apr 2019 10:01pm
<< post removed >>
Thank you!
Great question: I too became fascinated with the simple question:
what *is* light?
As it follows one can not work with something that is not known/understood. I understand the Hebrew word 'hashemayim' (translated eng.: "heavens") as literally 'the' 'fire' 'waters'. There are waters below (ie. organ / Eve) and waters above (ie. brain / Adam) and the "fire" is that which exists between them: ish (Hebrew word meaning masc. fire) and isha (Hebrew word meaning fem. fire) which I rendered Isha and Isha. Their shared will to bestow / will to receive creates what is "light" (aur). The nature/substance of the interaction is ein sof (without limit).
In a single being, such fire-waters are reflected in the lower/higher organs, both being suspended in fluid. How these lower/higher organs interact are denoted by the Edenic Adam and Eve via their respective ish and isha: when the lower organ "feeds" the higher organ (ie. Eve gives the fruit to Adam) they fall and give birth to Cain etc.
I understand this as mishandling/misuse of the "light" that is the fire of the lower waters: sex. Therefor how one utilizes this fire (ie, 'choice') determines whether or not good and evil enter their own garden. This is how/why I equate eating of the forbidden fruits (ie. introduction of evil) to be when man sexually abuses woman and then tries to blame *her* for it. When Adam was questioned whether or not he ate, he tried to blame it on the woman.
It is for this reason I dedicate these poems as a contest to Abrahamism (esp. Islam): it is the perpetual fall of man constantly moving away from the primordial Edenic state wherein a single couple pair share endlessly their "light".
Great question: I too became fascinated with the simple question:
what *is* light?
As it follows one can not work with something that is not known/understood. I understand the Hebrew word 'hashemayim' (translated eng.: "heavens") as literally 'the' 'fire' 'waters'. There are waters below (ie. organ / Eve) and waters above (ie. brain / Adam) and the "fire" is that which exists between them: ish (Hebrew word meaning masc. fire) and isha (Hebrew word meaning fem. fire) which I rendered Isha and Isha. Their shared will to bestow / will to receive creates what is "light" (aur). The nature/substance of the interaction is ein sof (without limit).
In a single being, such fire-waters are reflected in the lower/higher organs, both being suspended in fluid. How these lower/higher organs interact are denoted by the Edenic Adam and Eve via their respective ish and isha: when the lower organ "feeds" the higher organ (ie. Eve gives the fruit to Adam) they fall and give birth to Cain etc.
I understand this as mishandling/misuse of the "light" that is the fire of the lower waters: sex. Therefor how one utilizes this fire (ie, 'choice') determines whether or not good and evil enter their own garden. This is how/why I equate eating of the forbidden fruits (ie. introduction of evil) to be when man sexually abuses woman and then tries to blame *her* for it. When Adam was questioned whether or not he ate, he tried to blame it on the woman.
It is for this reason I dedicate these poems as a contest to Abrahamism (esp. Islam): it is the perpetual fall of man constantly moving away from the primordial Edenic state wherein a single couple pair share endlessly their "light".
