The Vietnamese War Could Have Been Won. Why Wasn't It ??!!

The Communist North Vietnamese waged a guerrilla war
in South Vietnam from the start to almost the very end..
But in the end, the North switched strategy,
changing from guerrilla war to conventional war.
I  mean the North invaded South Vietnam with thousands
of battle tanks and armored personnel carriers(APCs).

Where did they get those heavy tanks and APCs?
Russia had transported those tanks on ships that
were unloaded at the port of Haiphong.
My point is that if America had bombed that port and others,
Those Soviet tanks would not have been available to the enemy,
the NVA, the North Vietnamese Army.
And South Vietnam would still be free today !!!

Without that massive invasion from the North,
equipped with tanks and mobile artillery (super tanks),
The South Vietnamese army wouldn't have been spooked,
collapsing in the face of overwhelming force
ie, the superior North Vietnamese Military Juggernaut.

Why weren't those northern ports bombed or blockaded
Like they could have, should have, been ??!!
Because of the civilian control of the American military
by the losers of the political regimes of each
of our pussy presidents, our worthless politicians !!!

In the American Civil War of 1861-1865,
the Union forces blockaded the Southern ports.
It was after all only the natural thing to do..
If those ports had been open to trade,
the South could have maintained supplies
and kept up the war for longer than it did.

If the Union forces had conducted the Civil War the way
we ran the Vietnamese War, the South might have won.
I'm trying to convey just how ineptly the Vietnamese War was fought.

Here's my point,
those same "civilian control" bean-brains are running our military today.
They have mishandled four things concerning our Nuclear Arsenal.
Check out my latest piece on our Nuclear Arsenal.
"Why M.A.D. (Mutual Assured Destruction) is Obsolete, Totally Invalid"