Eucharist and Bible Inerrancy

At Calvary Christ's bones were not broken.
But His body(flesh) was(John 19.32-36;Psalms 34.20;Ex.12.46;Num.9.12.)    
The blood pouring out = the breaking of the seal of His skin.
"The scripture can not be broken," Christ said(John 10.35).    
This corresponds to Christ's bones not being broken.
But some scriptures ARE "broken," in that they're NOT inerrant !!    
So that kind corresponds to Christ's flesh being broken  !!    
   
Just like its needful for "[Christ's] body [to be] broken for you"(1 Corinthians 11.24),
because of what His self-sacrifice accomplished for us,
So too, it's needful for some scriptures to be found "broken," - errant,    
If its for our benefit !!    
 
Interjection:
But before I go into Genesis chapter 1's "Creation Week,"  
Let me emphasize the parallelism between Christ and the Bible.  
The Bible (the Torah, etc) is "the Word of God" (Romans 3.2; 2 Timothy 3.16),  
While Christ  is"the Word [of God] made flesh"(John 1.1, 14).  
The Bible is the written Word of God,  
While Christ, as the living Word, is superior to the Bible.  
Christ is "the Word [that] was [and is] God,"(John 1.1),  
Whereas, the Bible is NOT God !!  
 
Therefore, it would be WRONG for Christ's body to be broken  
While scripture  -  the body  -  of the Bible escapes UN-broken, remaining intact !!  
Just like "the servant is not greater than his Master"(Matthew 10.24;Lk 6.40;Jhn 13.16;15.20)  
The Bible shouldn't be seen as greater than Christ.  
If Christ's body had to be broken, so too with the body of the Bible.
(For the sake of the BENEFIT that comes from it.)
 
Now for Genesis 1.  
Just how does Genesis 1 being "broken," / disproved,  
 turn out to be for our benefit ??    
It opens the door to reassessment, reinterpretation.    
Within what metaphorical framework?    
That offered by the Big Bang Theory (BBT),  
On the basis that Revelation interprets Revelation.    
Just like "Scripture interprets Scripture."    
 
There are two Revelations of God by God:    
(1)"Special Revelation," the Bible as the Word of God.    
(2)"General Revelation," data gained by the study of Nature(Romans 1.19-20),    
Which study has developed into S C I E N C E !!    
So science is qualified, authorized, by the Bible (Romans 1.19-20; Psalms 19.1-4)    
To interpret Genesis 1,according to the BBT !!    
   
Only the BBT is qualified to serve as a key to unlock the secret of Genesis 1 !!    
For it's based on starlight which comes from  "the heavens,"  
In fact, the Big Bang Theory is what "the heavens [have] declared"(Ps 19.1-4).    
So, the BBT is the "glory of God", fulfilling Psalms 19.1's words beautifully !!    
   
The Gnostics gave the concept of "secret knowledge" a bad name.    
Their socalled secret knowledge was false complexity, - garbage.    
But real "secret knowledge" has a valid role to play in the Gospel and in Christianity.    
The new interpretation of Genesis 1 is based on the premise  
that Genesis 1 hides the SECRET of the Creation Account,  
The SECRET that is to be unlocked by the key called the BBT !!  
 
The new way to interpret Genesis 1 is better than the old way,    
like a bag of popcorn has to be put thru the microwave oven  
in order to improve on - fill out  - the popcorn.    
The BBT explains "let there be light,"(Genesis 1.3), for one thing.    
 
For all the matter (as energy) of the universe today  
To have been produced within a nano second from an infinitesimal opening    
is more glorious than how Creation's sequence reads in Gen 1 !!    
With Earth being produced first, without being part of any system.