AI content concerns and solutions
Passing off AI generated poetry as your own feels inauthentic. It is deceptive. This is a space for people creating and sharing authentic poetry. Are we now replacing the human mind with technology? Poetry is a beautiful art form that computers can never create.
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
Hi Mr. Black. It’s Betty. I’ll be anonymous since you blocked me for using your own techniques on you.
So… Same bitch. Unblock me and let me review the way you review… or shut the fuck up you hypocritical twat.
Or? Stop crying bully and write your own shit? Too hard?
So… Same bitch. Unblock me and let me review the way you review… or shut the fuck up you hypocritical twat.
Or? Stop crying bully and write your own shit? Too hard?
Everavalon said:Passing off AI generated poetry as your own feels inauthentic. It is deceptive. This is a space for people creating and sharing authentic poetry. Are we now replacing the human mind with technology? Poetry is a beautiful art form that computers can never create.
I'm just curious because places like this are full of people who deceive. Few of us use our real names, we write poetry about things we have never done but we write it in a way that makes it feel we have, there have been users that are male pretending to be female, etc etc etc.
I'm not advocating for AI generated poems, just trying to figure out why it's such a big deal. Last year sometime we had a poetry competition that asked us to use AI art inspired by our user name (or something like that) and lots of people jumped on it without thinking twice. do you feel the same about AI generated visual art as you do AI generated poems? I'm generally curious.
(also, if i'm highjacking the thread, sorry! tell me to hush and i will!)
I'm just curious because places like this are full of people who deceive. Few of us use our real names, we write poetry about things we have never done but we write it in a way that makes it feel we have, there have been users that are male pretending to be female, etc etc etc.
I'm not advocating for AI generated poems, just trying to figure out why it's such a big deal. Last year sometime we had a poetry competition that asked us to use AI art inspired by our user name (or something like that) and lots of people jumped on it without thinking twice. do you feel the same about AI generated visual art as you do AI generated poems? I'm generally curious.
(also, if i'm highjacking the thread, sorry! tell me to hush and i will!)
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
Daisy the answer is that we can’t compete. It’s steroids at the Olympics.
For example… picking two random poets:
Mr Black can plug your poem into ChatGpt and ask it for an analysis and in about 12 seconds, get a great review. He then passes that off as his unique work.
Daniel spends an hour giving an analysis that is heartfelt and thought provoking.
Mr Black can wipe the floor with Daniel using tech and claiming it’s his.
People are also using the same tech to write poetry.
This site has a monthly reviewer contest and many poetry contests. This practice is taking a toll on the people who bust their ass to put works out.
We have a previous thread negotiating the pros and cons and how to address this.
It’s fucked, basically.
If the users identified ‘this is not my poem, it was written by CHAtgpt’ would you want to read it?
If the users identified ‘this is a chat got’ comment, as I have done in Mr Blacks work, would you care much about the comment?
If you care less about a robot, then it means you value human effort. Human effort is being displaced through cheating
It’s fucked 🙂
For example… picking two random poets:
Mr Black can plug your poem into ChatGpt and ask it for an analysis and in about 12 seconds, get a great review. He then passes that off as his unique work.
Daniel spends an hour giving an analysis that is heartfelt and thought provoking.
Mr Black can wipe the floor with Daniel using tech and claiming it’s his.
People are also using the same tech to write poetry.
This site has a monthly reviewer contest and many poetry contests. This practice is taking a toll on the people who bust their ass to put works out.
We have a previous thread negotiating the pros and cons and how to address this.
It’s fucked, basically.
If the users identified ‘this is not my poem, it was written by CHAtgpt’ would you want to read it?
If the users identified ‘this is a chat got’ comment, as I have done in Mr Blacks work, would you care much about the comment?
If you care less about a robot, then it means you value human effort. Human effort is being displaced through cheating
It’s fucked 🙂
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
I am from the "old school," and If people can't think for themselves, they should not clone their ignorance. AI is only going to lead to people becoming immune of what is not reality. There are those who always try to beat the system. Speaking only for myself, the comment box is only to garner attention and the deceitful people use it to their advantage.
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
