Is the World Safe for Conversation Anymore?
Billy_Snagg said:Tell Anna that, not me! (Ironic Lol)
I see that it was deleted. I guess the mods thought it was too spicy. Anna, if it really rubbed you the wrong way, I’m sorry. I just just trying to match rapport.
Anna has been kinda indicative that she really actually dislikes me, but I thought she was being more playful...
Anna, peace. 🕊
You’re not an enemy in my mind. Tribal war is not my cup of tea.
Just leave me alone if you think you really hate me. It would fare better for everybody on so many levels. 👍
I see that it was deleted. I guess the mods thought it was too spicy. Anna, if it really rubbed you the wrong way, I’m sorry. I just just trying to match rapport.
Anna has been kinda indicative that she really actually dislikes me, but I thought she was being more playful...
Anna, peace. 🕊
You’re not an enemy in my mind. Tribal war is not my cup of tea.
Just leave me alone if you think you really hate me. It would fare better for everybody on so many levels. 👍
Sounds like Biden's the real enemy here, Messy & you mustn't forget that. Regarding your media feeds, seems like Biden & Trump are as bad as each other. It's just that maybe Trump's more honest about it; what do you think?
troller
you are a trawler in the green gold blue black
sea i love.
you are a trawler calling herself the ark of the covenant
outfitted absurdly for war.
the white dove you send flying
wants to sleep in the sand.
and your lines hang with rotten meat.
you will catch no good fish today.
Written by anna_grin
(ANNAN)
Go To Page
When Jesus Gave the Devils Free Speech
Better than sinners
hiding behind a fig leaf
of socially acceptable
filtered and censored beliefs
are the devils
who get a voice
Worse than unspoken love
...that devil you don’t know
mute and yet active
destroying the show
Silence just covers
the enemy’s blows
Even Jesus
let the tongue free
of devils warring with him
asked them their name
before silencing them to shame
Because he knew
revealing the damage
of darkness is truth
and it’s how we let
the captives go free
hiding behind a fig leaf
of socially acceptable
filtered and censored beliefs
are the devils
who get a voice
Worse than unspoken love
...that devil you don’t know
mute and yet active
destroying the show
Silence just covers
the enemy’s blows
Even Jesus
let the tongue free
of devils warring with him
asked them their name
before silencing them to shame
Because he knew
revealing the damage
of darkness is truth
and it’s how we let
the captives go free
Written by EdibleWords
Go To Page
EdibleWords said:
No, but I would watch it to see what he was quoting. He typically reads reports. Then I’d discuss. That’s all. *Shrug....*
Journalists, despite their bias, to give the user a perspective, present or at least seem to present both sides of the story. Objectivity is at least shown as to be attempted.
Opinion writing and commentary are not journalism.
No, but I would watch it to see what he was quoting. He typically reads reports. Then I’d discuss. That’s all. *Shrug....*
Journalists, despite their bias, to give the user a perspective, present or at least seem to present both sides of the story. Objectivity is at least shown as to be attempted.
Opinion writing and commentary are not journalism.
cold_fusion said:Do the right wing/conservatives regardless of how close to the centre or how far from it, have the sole monopoly over people's welfare in their policies?
The people have the monopoly. Or God does.
It’s not a partisan issue, regardless of opinions.
The people have parties, more than 2, who look after their causes.
There is a uniparty - full of neoliberal fake-wokes and neoconservative war-hawks - who seem agreeable across the isle with every bad policy, who would love to think they hold a monopoly.
The people have the monopoly. Or God does.
It’s not a partisan issue, regardless of opinions.
The people have parties, more than 2, who look after their causes.
There is a uniparty - full of neoliberal fake-wokes and neoconservative war-hawks - who seem agreeable across the isle with every bad policy, who would love to think they hold a monopoly.
cold_fusion said:
Journalists, despite their bias, to give the user a perspective, present or at least seem to present both sides of the story. Objectivity is at least shown as to be attempted.
Opinion writing and commentary are not journalism.
I understand. I don’t disagree. I’m just saying to think Tim wouldn’t provide any evidence with his milk-toast perspective wouldn’t cross my mind.
Tim hardly has an opinion for many things but loves to interview and review.
Journalists, despite their bias, to give the user a perspective, present or at least seem to present both sides of the story. Objectivity is at least shown as to be attempted.
Opinion writing and commentary are not journalism.
I understand. I don’t disagree. I’m just saying to think Tim wouldn’t provide any evidence with his milk-toast perspective wouldn’t cross my mind.
Tim hardly has an opinion for many things but loves to interview and review.
EdibleWords said:
The people have the monopoly. Or God does.
It’s not a partisan issue, regardless of opinions.
The people have parties, more than 2, who look after their causes.
It's not in dispute that people's welfare is at the heart of both left and right wings of political leanings just their methods/policies of getting there?
The people have the monopoly. Or God does.
It’s not a partisan issue, regardless of opinions.
The people have parties, more than 2, who look after their causes.
It's not in dispute that people's welfare is at the heart of both left and right wings of political leanings just their methods/policies of getting there?
cold_fusion said:
It's not in dispute that people's welfare is at the heart of both left and right wings of political leanings just their methods/policies of getting there?
When liberals advocate for gay rights, the people’s welfare is being protected. When the right advocates for religious liberty, the people’s welfare is at heart.
When neocons advocate for endless war, the people get hurt. When neolibs advocate for cancel-culture people get hurt.
It's not in dispute that people's welfare is at the heart of both left and right wings of political leanings just their methods/policies of getting there?
When liberals advocate for gay rights, the people’s welfare is being protected. When the right advocates for religious liberty, the people’s welfare is at heart.
When neocons advocate for endless war, the people get hurt. When neolibs advocate for cancel-culture people get hurt.
https://youtu.be/n6fAQ8D1gmU
I felt this was encouraging today in an odd sort of way. Relatable, even if I was never a Rush fan.
