Something fishy on DU
Anonymous
I’ll slap Mary’s ass if she being naughty and is on that shady type shit.
Ahavati said:
What are you the feeling police.
Also did you not CRY to the mods and try get me censored way back on the first covid19 thread which you claimed was about discourse. All the likes of you and Johnny yes man did was ridicule and name call those that disagreed with the narrative. Why do you think Drone kept going on about Dr's and scientists speaking up on it.
You are such a hypocrite and there are those of us that see through your nicey nice veneer.
The reason you dont like skys methods is because she isn't underhanded with her views, as sledge hammer to the face they, there is clearly a mod bias problem here.
As i said earlier all mods to step down, my suggestion is new mods voted in with previous mods ineligible for nomination this round, granted not everyone wants to be a moderator. Every 6 months to a year new mods nominated and voted in.
Also the moderators over the years are becoming more like the thought police on this site. Is that their roll now or is it to help with administrative duties so DUP runs smoothly
That's just one suggestion.
What are you the feeling police.
Also did you not CRY to the mods and try get me censored way back on the first covid19 thread which you claimed was about discourse. All the likes of you and Johnny yes man did was ridicule and name call those that disagreed with the narrative. Why do you think Drone kept going on about Dr's and scientists speaking up on it.
You are such a hypocrite and there are those of us that see through your nicey nice veneer.
The reason you dont like skys methods is because she isn't underhanded with her views, as sledge hammer to the face they, there is clearly a mod bias problem here.
As i said earlier all mods to step down, my suggestion is new mods voted in with previous mods ineligible for nomination this round, granted not everyone wants to be a moderator. Every 6 months to a year new mods nominated and voted in.
Also the moderators over the years are becoming more like the thought police on this site. Is that their roll now or is it to help with administrative duties so DUP runs smoothly
That's just one suggestion.
Ahavati said:
I dunno, Kumar. Surely I am not the only person to debate a topic without verbally attacking someone?
Thank you for your positive presence.
The attacking doesn't belong here. Unfortunately, I don't know what can be done about that. There are many avenues provided here for such behavior, and trying to stop it really is a slippery slope, I fear. I think as long as there are rules here, there should be moderating, and when people act very disrespectfully and don't stop, they should be banned. I mean, maybe the system worked in this case. The alternative seems to be no system.
I dunno, Kumar. Surely I am not the only person to debate a topic without verbally attacking someone?
Thank you for your positive presence.
The attacking doesn't belong here. Unfortunately, I don't know what can be done about that. There are many avenues provided here for such behavior, and trying to stop it really is a slippery slope, I fear. I think as long as there are rules here, there should be moderating, and when people act very disrespectfully and don't stop, they should be banned. I mean, maybe the system worked in this case. The alternative seems to be no system.
SatInUGal said:
The attacking doesn't belong here. Unfortunately, I don't know what can be done about that. There are many avenues provided here for such behavior, and trying to stop it really is a slippery slope, I fear. I think as long as there are rules here, there should be moderating, and when people act very disrespectfully and don't stop, they should be banned. I mean, maybe the system worked in this case. The alternative seems to be no system.
Exactly. There is a way to discuss something without slashing someone who disagrees with you to pieces via verbal attacks or abuse. That is nothing but a form of bullying in attempts to remove an obstacle you feel threatened by.
The attacking doesn't belong here. Unfortunately, I don't know what can be done about that. There are many avenues provided here for such behavior, and trying to stop it really is a slippery slope, I fear. I think as long as there are rules here, there should be moderating, and when people act very disrespectfully and don't stop, they should be banned. I mean, maybe the system worked in this case. The alternative seems to be no system.
Exactly. There is a way to discuss something without slashing someone who disagrees with you to pieces via verbal attacks or abuse. That is nothing but a form of bullying in attempts to remove an obstacle you feel threatened by.
Anonymous
Carpe_Noctem said:
I agree Theo, remember the reason why multiple accounts had to listed. People giving fake trophies to their alter egos. Fucking joke
There's that lack of a thing called PROOF again that Lepp was referring to in regards to unsubstantiated inferences / accusations and the person this thread revolves around.
I agree Theo, remember the reason why multiple accounts had to listed. People giving fake trophies to their alter egos. Fucking joke
There's that lack of a thing called PROOF again that Lepp was referring to in regards to unsubstantiated inferences / accusations and the person this thread revolves around.
JohnnyBlaze said:
I'm not implying anything.
Surely the real Carpe would be smart enough not to continually defend someone who was repeatedly banned for unprovoked attacks on me, Ahavati, Lepp, MadameLavender, the other mods, Missy ....?
Well here's the thing Johnny yes man.
Im for freedom of speech even if i dont agree with it or find the name calling a bit of. Perhaps i agree with opinions voiced on personalities whos characters maybe not as nice as they first appear.
Also i have 1 profile how many unlisted ones you guys got. That's the thing with that, we can only take at face value those you listed. Not too hard to fathom characters that in previous history would use multiple profiles to rig comps in their favor, might have a few hidden ones.
After all it's only your word their aren't any unlisted multiple personalities floating around.
I'm not implying anything.
Surely the real Carpe would be smart enough not to continually defend someone who was repeatedly banned for unprovoked attacks on me, Ahavati, Lepp, MadameLavender, the other mods, Missy ....?
Well here's the thing Johnny yes man.
Im for freedom of speech even if i dont agree with it or find the name calling a bit of. Perhaps i agree with opinions voiced on personalities whos characters maybe not as nice as they first appear.
Also i have 1 profile how many unlisted ones you guys got. That's the thing with that, we can only take at face value those you listed. Not too hard to fathom characters that in previous history would use multiple profiles to rig comps in their favor, might have a few hidden ones.
After all it's only your word their aren't any unlisted multiple personalities floating around.
Anonymous
Hello. It’s Jesus.
My children. You’re beautiful.
I can see you have such passion for the Deep Underground Poetry site. It’s commendable.
However, I would like something to be done, about everyone here using every single one of my alter ego names. Until then, the path to spirituality is a thin road, and I do not see anyone entering the gates to my Fathers kingdom.
Come at me bro.
(lol)
My children. You’re beautiful.
I can see you have such passion for the Deep Underground Poetry site. It’s commendable.
However, I would like something to be done, about everyone here using every single one of my alter ego names. Until then, the path to spirituality is a thin road, and I do not see anyone entering the gates to my Fathers kingdom.
Come at me bro.
(lol)
Anonymous
Carpe_Noctem said:
Well here's the thing Johnny yes man.
Im for freedom of speech even if i dont agree with it or find the name calling a bit of. Perhaps i agree with opinions voiced on personalities whos characters maybe not as nice as they first appear.
Also i have 1 profile how many unlisted ones you guys got. That's the thing with that, we can only take at face value those you listed. Not too hard to fathom characters that in previous history would use multiple profiles to rig comps in their favor, might have a few hidden ones.
After all it's only your word their aren't any unlisted multiple personalities floating around.
Do you mean like Sky's account that never listed her Subrosa account per the Site Guidelines?
LMAO
Please quit while you are behind.
Well here's the thing Johnny yes man.
Im for freedom of speech even if i dont agree with it or find the name calling a bit of. Perhaps i agree with opinions voiced on personalities whos characters maybe not as nice as they first appear.
Also i have 1 profile how many unlisted ones you guys got. That's the thing with that, we can only take at face value those you listed. Not too hard to fathom characters that in previous history would use multiple profiles to rig comps in their favor, might have a few hidden ones.
After all it's only your word their aren't any unlisted multiple personalities floating around.
Do you mean like Sky's account that never listed her Subrosa account per the Site Guidelines?
LMAO
Please quit while you are behind.
