Dumfries police..

"Under the False Oaths (Scotland) Act 1933, making a false statement under oath in judicial proceedings, including providing false evidence in court, is a criminal offence. This act seeks to ensure the veracity of information presented in court and upholds the sanctity of the legal process. Those found guilty of perjury may face imprisonment for up to five years.

Wasting Police Time
The Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995 criminalizes knowingly making false reports that lead to a wasteful employment of the police. This offence aims to prevent the diversion of police resources due to baseless claims. Individuals found guilty of wasting police time may face either a fine or imprisonment for a period of up to three months.

Perverting the Course of Justice
Perverting the course of justice, a common law offence, encompasses acts that interfere with the administration of justice, including making false accusations. The severity of the punishment, including imprisonment, depends on the circumstances of the case. This offence underscores the gravity of actions that obstruct the proper functioning of the justice system.

Depending on the circumstances people who have made false accusations of sexual offences, including rape, could be prosecuted for either wasting police time or perverting the course of justice. Perverting the course of justice has a maximum sentence of life imprisonment".

I hope you appreciated my letter I requested to be inserted into my records in regard to this matter..

Let me start with a thank you..
With out you I would not be getting, what should I call it, "compensation"? The 14 breaches of the peace you handed me being part of the argument that sealed the judgement.. So thank you..

And back to the letter I handed in;
The " perverting the course of justice"..

It seems my testimony DID NOT "pervert the course of justice"..
And you have given up and accepted I was in my rights all the time and as you cannot find anything to charge me with, in relation to the Interpol investigation,  you accept you are either incompetent or I was right all along..

There are no other options..
"Incompetence" or I win?

Either you could have prosecuted me or you could not and in this case you cannot prosecute me, Interpol and the courts refuse to prosecute me and even my accused refuse to prosecute yours truly..

Further more. Not only can you not find me guilty of perverting the course of justice.. OR anything else.. You have now been told by police professional standards to amend my police records and insert the fact I am not, not nor ever was, mentally ill.

In fact the condition that I do have is not a mental illness its more of an anti society disorder that will not tolerate being lorded over by anyone or any organisation including you. A way of thinking that some what debunks popular opinion and the reason I refuse to  have relationships.

So it has now been acknowledged by the NHS I had the right to deal with past matters how I did, how I do now and how I will always do in the future...

You, police, possibly would have given me more credit if you knew that I had also dealt with a conman successfully, two financial ombusman cases successfully, two sexual misconduct court cases successfully and one outside the court perameters successfully..
Also maybe if you knew my life experiences were valid... Africa, India, the far East, ditto qualifications, mountains, piggy bank, stocks and not forgetting land.. You may have realised that I am quite good at fighting my corner.
Be it against you (apology), the council (apology), nhs (apology) or enlisting Interpol and the courts to hear my voice and permanent document my concern..

My final point D&G police is this..
When you try to falsely accuse someone, be it to the press or DVLA you have to bear in mind the person who you are accusing knows the truth and the truth is a lot easier to prove than warped small town gossip..
It is the reason why my records both NHS accusations and yours have been amended, debunked.. Or completely bullsh**ed..
And it also why you are impotent to charge me for any offences that, in the eyes of the law, are very much criminal..
As you cannot I remain INNOCENT..

No means "no" be it in the 1990's or today..
I think you better start accepting that fact ,after all, it is not young girls and women who hiding in their bedroom downloading porn and reaching for the tissue paper..