deepundergroundpoetry.com
self sex naturally develops into same sex
Same Sex is Self Sex - or as Close to it as You can Get.
Same sex action is an extension of self sex.
It picks up where self sex action leaves off.
Gays claim "i was born this way," implying that
straights, likewise,are straight from the start..
Actually anyone who masturbates and enjoys it is
conditioning himself to find pleasure in same sex encounters.
Just like when an individual is alone and throws
a baseball into the air and hits it with a bat -
He is preparing for playing ball on a team level.
Having sex with one penis (your own) or with two penises
All that changes is the numbers,the TYPE of organ stays the same.
When your mind is focused on yourself during auto-eroticism,
Isn't that same frame of mind carried over into same sex unions ??
What i am saying is that everyone is potentially gay,
due to the availability of (genital-focused) masturbation
So the idea that straights are born straight isn't really true.
Whereas, the claim that gays are "born that way" is more true.
Homosexuality is sort of the "default position" that we are all born with.
Straights are those people who grow out of it,
the sexual self-centeredness we all start out with.
Whereas, the gay person is somewhat of a case of "arrested development."
Retaining and developing that original potential appetite.
The question to consider is, Should the laws of society
encourage people to act out their potential gayness ?
(By legalizing homosexuality and even same-sex marriage).
Or should society promote heterosexuality via legal favoritism
The sexual version of "affirmative action," I guess you could say.
Which has been the case for centuries in most, if not all, societies.
Also, what changes for good or bad would occur if gays made up
50% of society in place of the present 2% to 5% ??
(Due to the power of masturbation to steer one's direction)
it is theoretically possible for society (in one place or several) to develop
Wherein even 100% of the population practice homosexuality,
Either exclusively or as part of being bi-sexual.
(I'm talking about if there's a legal, cultural, moral "level playing field,"
And if enuff time transpires, of course.)
If men don't bond with women in terms of sex and marriage,
how would that effect - change - harm - society?
If you pour hydrogen into a container with oxygen
Do you automatically have water. Of course not.
Only when hydrogen BONDS WITH oxygen do you
get real water, and the wetness we all need.
In order to get water, hydrogen has to MARRY oxygen.
If enuff men bond with men, and enuff women with women,
How can that NOT effect society significantly, even drastically.
Again, if hydrogen bonds with itself, and oxygen with oxygen,
that's a recipe for failure
if water is what you're after.
Same sex action is an extension of self sex.
It picks up where self sex action leaves off.
Gays claim "i was born this way," implying that
straights, likewise,are straight from the start..
Actually anyone who masturbates and enjoys it is
conditioning himself to find pleasure in same sex encounters.
Just like when an individual is alone and throws
a baseball into the air and hits it with a bat -
He is preparing for playing ball on a team level.
Having sex with one penis (your own) or with two penises
All that changes is the numbers,the TYPE of organ stays the same.
When your mind is focused on yourself during auto-eroticism,
Isn't that same frame of mind carried over into same sex unions ??
What i am saying is that everyone is potentially gay,
due to the availability of (genital-focused) masturbation
So the idea that straights are born straight isn't really true.
Whereas, the claim that gays are "born that way" is more true.
Homosexuality is sort of the "default position" that we are all born with.
Straights are those people who grow out of it,
the sexual self-centeredness we all start out with.
Whereas, the gay person is somewhat of a case of "arrested development."
Retaining and developing that original potential appetite.
The question to consider is, Should the laws of society
encourage people to act out their potential gayness ?
(By legalizing homosexuality and even same-sex marriage).
Or should society promote heterosexuality via legal favoritism
The sexual version of "affirmative action," I guess you could say.
Which has been the case for centuries in most, if not all, societies.
Also, what changes for good or bad would occur if gays made up
50% of society in place of the present 2% to 5% ??
(Due to the power of masturbation to steer one's direction)
it is theoretically possible for society (in one place or several) to develop
Wherein even 100% of the population practice homosexuality,
Either exclusively or as part of being bi-sexual.
(I'm talking about if there's a legal, cultural, moral "level playing field,"
And if enuff time transpires, of course.)
If men don't bond with women in terms of sex and marriage,
how would that effect - change - harm - society?
If you pour hydrogen into a container with oxygen
Do you automatically have water. Of course not.
Only when hydrogen BONDS WITH oxygen do you
get real water, and the wetness we all need.
In order to get water, hydrogen has to MARRY oxygen.
If enuff men bond with men, and enuff women with women,
How can that NOT effect society significantly, even drastically.
Again, if hydrogen bonds with itself, and oxygen with oxygen,
that's a recipe for failure
if water is what you're after.
Published 29th Aug 2016
| Edited 31st Aug 2016
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 0
reading list entries 0
comments 4
reads 685
Commenting Preference:
The author is looking for friendly feedback.
Anonymous
- Edited 30th Aug 2016 2:10am
30th Aug 2016 1:33am
Is this based on any scientific fact? In fact I've ad enuff of your guff already, especially as you can't even spell properly! ;-)
Any scientific fact? That's the question to ask. If sameness (of the organ) gives one a sense of familiarity, and if familiarity is attractive, more so than non-familiarity, well then, this would account for the draw of same sex union. Homosexuality = dealing with "a known quantity." While hetero is dealing with the purely "other," the foreign, so to speak. Isn't the "familiar" logically attractive. You gain a sense of competence by dealing with what you already know, don't you? Logically, since a young boy becomes quite knowledgeable with his organ thru masturbation and a second boy has the same organ, it is logical for the first boy to have a BUILT-IN sense of familiarity with the second boy's body, even if they have never met.What I'm saying is that homosexuality is the default button. So, it is extremely easy (as easy as masturbation to occur) for same sex attraction to arise - unless social precautions are taken. Laws, etc. Now, as for this being scientific, somebody should have tested these claims way before now.
Anonymous
1st Sep 2016 00:04am
It boils down to attraction - not how often you masturbate!
I'm just going by personal experience. Attraction is based on perception. A baby can view dollars as mere green paper. Not particularly beautiful. But an adult coming across some money he discovers by accident (or that he wins at the lottery) perceives that green stuff as beautiful because he connects it with what it can buy, etc. He perceives it differently. Perception can be affected by pleasure. Or pain. If you are tied to a chair and receive electric shock when a certain piece of music is played, you may develop a hate for that music due to the pain you associate with it. If you feel pleasure, derive it from something, most likely you will like that thing, or if the pleasure is great enuff, you will feel, I LOVE it (that thing). So the rule I am devising is this: "Pleasure leads to liking. More pleasure leads to loving." Now with masturbation, going by the logic I have just presented, if your eyes FOCUS on the organ at hand in a devoted sort of way, you CAN develop, if you try hard enuff, a liking (or even loving) for it, NOT for the person but for the appendage.
So when you say "Attraction, not masturbation," you are ignoring the ability of pleasure to create "attraction." Attraction doesn't just happen. It develops for reasons. Looking favorably upon a part of the body as you are getting pleasure (even orgasm) from it is a sure way to TRAIN yourself to see or perceive it differently than in the past. There is a sort of "bonding"(?) or "imprinting" that can occur - over time. Especially if imagination is factored into the equation. in terms of fantasizing.
And then there is this thing called the "suspension of disbelief." I mean, when you watch a movie, you don't say, Heck, I saw that actor in another movie. I know he can't be Jack Smith. For he was Tom Johnson last week." No, that would be stupid. You knowingly or unwittingly "suspend your disbelief" that he is Jack Smith. I mean you employ your ability to PRETEND that the actor really is Jack Smith. Why? Because you want pleasure, the pleasure of an exciting story. And you can't get it if you let reality (the fact that the guy is just an actor, not Jack Smith at all) stand in the way, you see?
The point I'm making with this business about pretending is what? In masturbating one can pretend that x or y is true. According to how much it helps you "get off." Now, with myself, i have found that saying certain things helped me reach the tipping point, so to speak. So by my agreeing to go along, for the sake of the orgasm I was after, I in effect TRAINED myself to think a certain way, if you see what I mean. It's a matter of training. One ends up playing a role over and over. The ironic thing is that people don't realize where the attraction they feel comes from. They don't grasp that all the training they gave themselves had anything to do with it(the attraction they feel for something).
So when you say "Attraction, not masturbation," you are ignoring the ability of pleasure to create "attraction." Attraction doesn't just happen. It develops for reasons. Looking favorably upon a part of the body as you are getting pleasure (even orgasm) from it is a sure way to TRAIN yourself to see or perceive it differently than in the past. There is a sort of "bonding"(?) or "imprinting" that can occur - over time. Especially if imagination is factored into the equation. in terms of fantasizing.
And then there is this thing called the "suspension of disbelief." I mean, when you watch a movie, you don't say, Heck, I saw that actor in another movie. I know he can't be Jack Smith. For he was Tom Johnson last week." No, that would be stupid. You knowingly or unwittingly "suspend your disbelief" that he is Jack Smith. I mean you employ your ability to PRETEND that the actor really is Jack Smith. Why? Because you want pleasure, the pleasure of an exciting story. And you can't get it if you let reality (the fact that the guy is just an actor, not Jack Smith at all) stand in the way, you see?
The point I'm making with this business about pretending is what? In masturbating one can pretend that x or y is true. According to how much it helps you "get off." Now, with myself, i have found that saying certain things helped me reach the tipping point, so to speak. So by my agreeing to go along, for the sake of the orgasm I was after, I in effect TRAINED myself to think a certain way, if you see what I mean. It's a matter of training. One ends up playing a role over and over. The ironic thing is that people don't realize where the attraction they feel comes from. They don't grasp that all the training they gave themselves had anything to do with it(the attraction they feel for something).
