deepundergroundpoetry.com
no real critique
Why is it that it’s oh so rare
that those on DUP
who in reply to plain requests
from posters here
for honest criticism of their work
respond with thoughtful
well informed, articulate analysis
of how and why a piece
succeeds (or fails) to show
poetic art?
Is not the answer to my question that
most of the readers on this site
are clanging amateurs
too unfamiliar with the rules
of what Pope called “the dance”
and who have no idea of
the steps to take
and what to say
to let a person see
that he (or she) possesses (or does not)
the set of sills
so requisite
to make a piece effective and enchanting
poetry,
and so can muster nothing more
than “boo” or “yay”
that those on DUP
who in reply to plain requests
from posters here
for honest criticism of their work
respond with thoughtful
well informed, articulate analysis
of how and why a piece
succeeds (or fails) to show
poetic art?
Is not the answer to my question that
most of the readers on this site
are clanging amateurs
too unfamiliar with the rules
of what Pope called “the dance”
and who have no idea of
the steps to take
and what to say
to let a person see
that he (or she) possesses (or does not)
the set of sills
so requisite
to make a piece effective and enchanting
poetry,
and so can muster nothing more
than “boo” or “yay”
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 0
reading list entries 0
comments 6
reads 123
Commenting Preference:
The author encourages honest critique.