Clearly the brownnosing, intellectually challenged are impressed and taken in; the intelligently sane aren't though!

 
By Stanley Collymore

A sensibly dignified and actually
intelligently voiced outcry has
ostensibly forced Elizabeth  
Windsors hand and also  
that similarly, and unsurprisingly  
likewise belatedly of Liz's oldest  
child Charles, his very own son,
and predictably Liz's grandson
William; the two of whom are  
fervently keen under studies
in waiting of that discernibly  
quite plainly coveted British  
hereditary crown. However,
no sane or any distinctively  
conscionable, individual is
likely to be convinced that  
unusually quite laughably
and purportedly Windsor  
morality, has realistically  
been accountable, for it.

Not a hapless snowflake in hell's
chance, of that ever happening!
Very unquestionably so, as Liz
Windsor has routinely, rather
fatuously, and immorally too
very knowingly, enabled her  
younger son and love child  
all of his brazen, egregious  
and spoilt life, in whatever
he distinctly, literally took
to doing and, undeniably,
is herself a most cardinal  
ingredient of just exactly  
what Andy malevolently  
is regarded as normally.  

And, were Elizabeth Windsor
not an outdated hereditary
birthright, quite privileged
and the basically entitled monarch
of a still crucially, unquestionably
distinctively actually pathetically
demonstrably characteristically  
and also a sick, psychologically  
ingrained feudal Britain this is
what everybody including the  
right-wing trolls, would vilely
and openly be saying about
private person, liz Windsor,
as a failed mum, but apt in
class infested, cap-doffing
to one's intrinsically, dear
socially regarded and too
laughably divine betters;
there's no reasoning, for
acute, British ass-licking.

(C) Stanley V Collymore
15 January 2022.


Author's Remarks:  
Done for her own selfish and self-serving benefit, of course! Liz's very famous phone calls to allegedly get favoured people off the hook are well known in proper investigative journalistic circles. Seemingly, they didn't work this time for Liz Windsor.

Anyone with even a half functioning brain, can readily see that they're all evidently protecting their money, and for all their repulsively, disingenuous PR claptrap, and distinctively also the brazenly attendantly, unsurprisingly brownnosing sycophancy; distinctly proselytizing, rightwing dishonest crap that Andy is being thrown under the Windsor bus, in reality nothing of the sort is really happening or ever likely to occur. Just a cynical ploy to keep you brownnosers happy, callously garner your sympathy, assiduously protect their family riches - and particularly in Andy's case the multi-million Pounds assets in the USA from being targeted by a US court  with obvioys jurisdiction there - and evidently keep the UK taxpayers funded financial train effectively and customarily running. No wonder they call themselves the "Firm".

There's no moral guilt coming from any of these Windsors; to stat with they have no concept of the word immorality, which naturally doesn't feature in either their individual or collective amoral lexicon. And put bluntly, you thoroughly dimwitted pillocks, so easily and thoroughly taken in as a direct consequence of your inured and imbecillicly sycophancy, have most egregiously, and even asininely quite delightedly, been had as usual by the Windsors, their ilk and rightwing media enablers! And frankly, you don't deserve any sympathy,  as it'll only be wasted on brownnosing scum like you! And the Windsors and Co. well know that; and fully exploit your rank stupidity in every way that they can!

It's long been basically known about the so-called "Firm's" multi-million Pounds investment in the USA which comprise massive quantities of land, ranches,farms and real estate in Park Avenue, New York. This case against Andrew Windsor is being held in the United States of America - not Britain where even the courts owe allegiance not to the state but a 95 year old, average nonagenarian woman - and where Elizabeth Windsor has no jurisdiction or control, since that is solely the prerogative of the duly constituted and democratically applied USA judicial system. And no amount of hereditary bullshit can alter that.

So publicly and quite ostentatiously supposedly cutting Andrew off and allegedly making him a "private" person is nothing but a cold-hearted and callously self-serving artifice to protect the Windsors multi-millions invested in the USA from likely court seizure in the event of Andrew possibly losing the court case that's lodged against him there.

Andrew however you look at it is an integral part of that privileged, hereditary Windsor family. So go work out for yourself, instead of having rags like the Daily Mail and social climbing brownnosing pillocks like Sara Vine telling you what to think, the quite categorical reasoning for the ostensibly bogus, publuc distancing from Andrew by his mum and other financially vested family members; assuming, of course, that inured dimwits  and seasoned brownnosers like you are actually capable of any such thing!