More beneficially you wanking or queerly being sucked off Stephen Glover than writing racist BS for the Daily Mail!

 
By Stanley Collymore

Sexually devious, and Wikipedia
shy about this sordid aspect of  
his rather queer life, Stephen  
Glover again has one of his usually
boring repetitive goes, at a clearly  
undeniably evidently, definitively
heterosexual Meghan Markle, in
a situation that he himself can't  
with any sensible, conscionably  
minded convictions discernibly  
particularly state, he's actually  
definitively in; even so, clearly  
foolishly believes that his vile  
rather tawdry privacy is, and
ought truly to be sacrosanct
and unlike that of Meghan's.

Stephen Glover: a pernicious,
vilely egregious, racist prat,  
deceitfully and virulently  
damning Meghan, for not being in
court during the Daily Mail's clear
Appeal Court's hearing, distinctly  
too when there was basically no
lawful requirement, for Meghan  
to actually be there, as all three
judges had really unanimously
agreed. Yet this same odiously
and egregious Stephen Glover  
is quite diametrically opposed
to Andy Windsor, cooperating
with the FBI; far less so, really  
morally generally showing up  
in a lawfully, stipulated court,
on essentially, rather serious
entirely criminal accusations  
of illegally carnal knowledge  
with distinctively, underage,
trafficked females linked to
bestial acts of paedophilia;
with exploitative sufferers.  

Far minor - no pun at all
intended - issues these
distinctively,  Andrew
Windsor suppositions, very clearly  
so in Stephen Glover's discernibly
sick and absolutely twisted mind  
than the distinctly nonsensically  
egregious act of Meghan legally  
and courageously, undeniably,
redoubtably championing her
inalienable right to the actual  
copyright, of a rather private  
letter which realistically with
hindsight, she'd, regrettably,
sent to her lousy graspingly
avaricious father but which  
the Daily Mail rag's fatuous
Arschloch Stephie Glover's
boss in its unquestionably
typical, bullying behaviour
of egregious, misogynistic
and fanatically motivated,  
racist tendencies towards
Meghan wilfully infringed.  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
3 December 2021.


Author's Remarks:
I earnestly suggest to you Stephen Glover and your similarly likeminded morons at the Daily Mail to sensibly and judiciously get a real life; but fully cognizant of your shamefully repugnant but none the less so shamelessly indulged in and likewise also arrogantly glorified in noxious behaviour,  espousing yourselves to be journalists and far more ridiculously the ethical ones that you proselytize yourselves to be, when nothing could be more at variance with reality; that the lot of you calibrate your utterly useless, pathetic, conceitedly and concertedly malevolent lives into some sort of normal, recognizable and personally responsible human behaviour - a perfectly valid suggestion although one I shan't be holding my breath on in your regards - or else in your specific case Stephen Glover, since this poem is principally although not exclusively targeted at you, that you far more beneficially in your specific case do what the title of this poem overtly recommends.

The Daily Mail has now lost twice to Meghan so, as a consequence of that, the laws must be changed, obviously runs the sick and twisted argument of the sore loser and their racist supporters. How could that happen to us, the white master race at the hands of an African American woman and in of all places England the centre of the universe?  A victory for Meghan perceived by all these inured racists as an irrefutably and insulting blow to all of them. Never mind the niceties of the law and its just application; all that really mattered to these racist bigots was the judicial outcome; and to them all Meghan actually winning, and never mind the facts of the case that legally substantiated her lawful rights, was the wrong outcome!  

Instead, spin Meghan's second win in the Appeal Court,  taken there by the Daily Mail when it lost the the initial case as a bogus free speech issue, when it is obviously nothing of the kind. The case was never about free speech but solely and sensibly privacy and copyright. It similarly is and always was the actual difference between what the public may be very interested in and what's basically in the public's interest. And quite clearly the latter is what must be protected. So it's absolutely incomprehensible to anyone in possession of a functioning brain why a private letter to one's father would be in the latter category. And if you think otherwise you're racially bigoted and seriously deluded.  

And here's specifically why! William who has distinctly opposed Harry's marriage to Meghan, exclusively so on the basis of Meghan's skin colour and racial ethnicity has evilly continuously since Harry's marriage to Meghan really endeavoured to break up his brother's marriage. As such he and his waity, avid social climbing , Stepford wife, broodmare partner Kate have essentially been principally, although not exclusively the only ones in the Windsor family, getting their several employed palace stooges and minions, who were themselves rather appalled at having to "serve" a Black woman in the so-called royal household, that as always by royal and parliamentary diktat has been exclusively white, to covertly and routinely get these vile sycophants to liaison with the UK's rightwing media, notoriously the Daily Mail and Daily Express, and concertedly plant dishonest, lying, totally fabricated stories about Meghan, specifically done at the behest of William and Kate and as well - irony totally lost on dimwitted William here relative to Camilla and the role she actively played in Diana's public humiliation through her ongoing and publicly adulterous affair with Charles and, of course, Diana's eventual murder, but seemingly William and Kate's ingrained racism is more poignant than what happened to Diana - so the fact that one of Camilla's offspring does work for the Daily Mail, so much the better from William and Kate's sick and twisted racist perspective, where their hoped for demise if Meghan is also being championed.

But the principal agents of these very hostile, fabricated and so egregiously evil stories spitefully, liberally laced with vile jealousy and entrenched racism are fundamentally without any doubt the pathetically demented actions of bone idle, workshy, white privileged, spoilt, I can do anything I want, petulant, not too bright but deeply inured racist William and his enthusiastically likeminded scheming bitch of a wife Kate Middleton. On the day of Meghan's second win, this time in the Court of Appeal, against the Daily Mail, Kate and William who together had surreptitiously provided the Daily Mail with massive assistance against Meghan during the Daily Mail's appeal, fervently hoping that Meghan would lose, were utterly and publicly dumb struck when the opposite verdict came out.

Ask yourself this: if your brand sister in law  were so unwarrantedly vilified as Harry and also specifically Meghan were and still are and your sister in law had again triumphed in court against her bullies wouldn't you at least publicly have hailed her victory? And if you didn't, why not? And the answer in Kate and William's case is discernibly clear, as these two envious and distinctly inured racist clowns were and still undeniably are the principal and instigatory palace moles odiously supplying rightwing rags, like the Daily Mail specifically, with these plethora of fabricated stories about Meghan that the Daily Mail rag routinely and with evidently 'royal warrant' publishes.

And with that particular channel of abuse shown up for what it actually is, on the very day of the Appeal Court's verdict, these two odious pillocks, William and Kate, decided to go, and actually went online and talked about faberge eggs, something which they know bugger all about; but it was a distraction. Quite stupid as both these pillocks are, but a distraction all the same in their sick and twisted minds.  Moreover, their joint action spoke volumes relative to their racist hatred of Meghan, and specifically their conspiratorial actions and racist activities with the Daily Mail; the two egregiously malevolent, white supremacist assholes!

Now the new disingenuous and very dishonest rallying call is all about the media's supposed right to free speech and freedom of information. Really? Like knowing the real wealth of the Windsors who're unaccountably funded by the taxpayers; the freedom to see their wills, which in every other person's case is legally obligatorily open to public scrutiny, but not so those of the Windsors? Similarly, the right to know the actual wealth of the tax evading owners of the Daily Mail and others, who are so very much against Meghan; including the very same Windsors and the antagonistic political opponents of Meghan hiding their ill gotten gains in overseas tax havens?

Boris Kemal/Johnson and his Tory chums incensed by the Appeal Court's decision in favour of Meghan are being canvassed by their rightwing media paymasters, principally the Daily Mail and similarly William and Kate, totally irate that Meghan has won again, to change the media's free speech laws in their biased favour.  Not only ironic this but also laughable. The same Boris Kemal/Johnson who threatened the same media with injunctions because they wanted to know how many kids - legitimate as well as bastard ones - he'd knowingly sired.

And if the Daily Mail really thinks that their version of intrusive press free speech is so vitally important, why didn't they and the rest of the UK's media report on William's post marital and adulterous affairs and the alleged bastard daughter he has sired,  and all reliable reports reaching me clearly indicate that she's the spitting image of her father William, and the principal reason why the child's mother, quite happy to place current pictures and other details about her earlier sons on social media, resolutely refuses to do the same with her daughter.

Surely this categorical state of affairs with William, the added fact that this child's mother is no longer the quite inseparably close and intimate friend of Kate that she previously was, and additionally that William threatened legal action to stave off media reports about his affairs had no effect whatsoever on the global media other than the British one, that had anyway of their cowardly choice decided not to incur the wrath of this hereditary 'elite' and pretend to be what they simply aren't, by telling William to piss off and then resolutely publish and be damned  - after all we now live in a DNA era, and if the illegitimate daughter of King Albert II of Belgium can be recognized by the courts there, the public and with her biological father and other members of his monarchical family finally forced as well to accept this determined woman's paternity, why the hell not in William's case or  that of all the others in this abominable and clearly serially adulterous Windsor family? But these brownnosing media sycophants are too shit scared of the British monarchy and absolutely petrified that they won't get their prized gongs and invitations to 'royal' garden parties and the like; and William knows this.

Just as this arrogant pillock is also well aware that the British media wouldn't call his bluff, precisely like the global media did, and who went ahead and published their own stories. And with history as it were clearly repeating itself in the Andrew, Epstein and Maxwell sex trafficking and illegal sexual relations matter, with the British media, and particularly rightwing rags like the Daily Mail pretending as if the issue doesn't exist.  

But what blatant hypocrites, both William and his Daily Mail chums wanting the said courts they readily castigate when things don't go their way, to still use to bully, brow beat or silence those who like Meghan have the mental liberation, courage and determination to stand up to them. A truly David and Goliath episode with the indefatigably fearless Meghan taking on the Daily Mail and their Windsor trash supporters and winning!  

And on the other side British  hypocrisy, double standards and brownnosing sycophancy at its most egregious. For in both Boris Kemal/Johnson and William Windsor's individual as well as their joint cases these are evidently two public figures of prominent interest in the affairs of the UK state, and as such their actions are rather correctly and equally so in the public's interest. Not a bloody personal letter that Meghan sent to her essentially estranged and quite publicly self-evidently trailer trash mindset father and with whom all of you similarly evil and vile racists empathize with solely because like you he's white, and Meghan has - to all sane minds justifiably done so - dumped him. But were Thomas Markle Snr, and likewise his awful son with the same name, been Black and behaving in the identical manner these lowlifes are, you wouldn't have given a toss about either of them, while happily carrying on your envious and vitriolic condemnation and vile castigation of Meghan, regardless!

And what priceless gall exuded by the Windsor spinners and racists - chiefly William and Kate - and their Pavlov dogs type, brownnosing media and sycophants, in painting Meghan as the spawn of the devil, then happily whistling in the wind whenever the name of Andrew Windsor, the grand old Duke of York, comes up. And ask yourself this question: if the owner of the Daily and Sunday Mail who is a hereditary British lord, tax evader living outside the UK while earning his money in the UK; is notorious for his adulterous liaisons with both genders, sent a private letter to one of his lovers, who with a cash incentive in mind, and no different from Thomas Markle Snr, trolls it across the media, do you imagine the British media per se let alone the Daily Mail or its sister paper the Sunday Mail ever publishing that PRIVATE letter, far less doing so on the bogus grounds of freedom of the press? Of course not. As their retort as to why not would be "privacy". Yet because you're racists, steeped in double standards and detest having a Black woman married to a Windsor, in your sick and twisted minds the same rules shouldn't apply to Meghan.

And when the Court of Appeal as did the initial court hearing rule twice in Meghan's favour your white privileged arrogance can't stomach that, so you want your Tory and champagne Keir Starmer Labtories pretend socialists to change the law. Honestly, what does that actually say about you?