Diana Spencer was murdered! The Means, Motive and Moment for killing her lay firmly with her ex-spouse and his family!

 
By Stanley Collymore  
 
Had Diana Spencer not married  
a husband, who indifferently  
and routinely completely  
left her on her own, while he went  
off rather unconcernedly with his  
unquestionably slapper mistress  
of many years things irrefutably    
and significantly, could fittingly  
and crucially, have been rather  
different. So for all of you sick  
and repulsively brownnosing  
sycophants who so asininely  
and basically brainlessly say  
that all of you naturally saw  
on TV, Charles marry Diana  
but didn't see him drag her  
up the aisle; your rampant,  
abysmal idiocy, and surely  
toxic, puerile, sycophancy  
are so profound and also  
blatantly apparent that it  
is not, at all, intelligently  
sensibly, crucially worth  
dignifying what you say  
with a logical comment.  
 
Objectively, though, I'll say this.  
Show me a single white man,  
British of course, naturally,  
looking for his biological mum; or  
woman, likewise in Britain, doing  
the same, as him; or a biological  
mum, who  on Long Lost Family  
enforcedly, but truly obligingly  
gave her newborn baby up for  
adoption, clearly, because the  
man who she naturally loved  
had told her he also similarly  
felt the same emotionally for  
her - and, so, persuaded her,  
quite easily to have sex with  
him! Self-servingly, sexually  
and predictably too getting    
her pregnant; but when on  
relatively hesitant but very  
proudly told by his lover of  
her unplanned situation he  
brusquely and cruelly then  
let known, the information  
he'd intentionally hid from  
her; that he was already, a  
pathologically lying; closet  
married man and crucially  
too distinctly had a family  
of his own; bluntly simply  
didn't love her; obviously  
was deliberately sexually  
using her. And evidently  
uncaringly, dumped her.  
 
Is any  of  this truly the fault  
of the woman? And apart  
from Charles' cynically,
cruelly lying to Diana, so that then  
he'd have his legal heir and spare  
by her, and nowt else; medically  
ensuring she was really a virgin
preceding his then proposal to  
her, since the slapper Camilla,  
he was compulsively, hooked  
on and usually shagging: the
vilely licentious tart that she  
ever was, she'd consistently  
been around the proverbial  
block comparatively, many  
more times, than any local  
Royal Mail postman surely  
succeeded, constructively  
to clock up officially so on  
his discernibly regulation  
bicycle; while oiled more  
frequently, and liberally,  
than that bicycle's chain.  
 
So what essentially is the  
difference - do tell you  
stupid brainwashed  
sycophants - between the sick,  
twisted, odiously, and clearly  
sickening; nastily-repulsive;  
distinctively evil; ludicrous,  
delusional plus arrogantly  
superior with it! And also  
the in depth misogynistic  
and dishonest behaviour  
of Charles  Windsor that  
was deliberately, aimed  
at Diana and not unlike  
that of the like-minded  
consciously vile absent  
biological fathers, plus    
evilly slapper mothers  
on - Long Lost Family?  
 
(C) Stanley V. Collymore  
27 October 2021.  
 
 
Author's Remarks:  
Had Elizabeth Mountbatten-Windsor lived in a terraced house as a "subject" rather than what she has been all her life: a privileged, pampered, by no means noticeably outstanding - if you sycophants choose to challenge that, then provide proof of a single thing that history will remember her for, other by a cruel twist of fate with her Uncle Edward's enforced abdication she became eligible by virtue of this insane Middle Ages mindset lottery, through her father George, and Edward's brother, a candidate to be queen of Britain, at let's say 42 Belmont Road, Reading, Berkshire, or even in a semi-detached one in neighbouring Tilehurst, instead of having several palatial residences and sprawling estates exclusively at her disposal, she would have been branded openly as a bloody awful mother courtesy of her own behaviour and additionally that of her discernibĺy dysfunctional family and distinctively would long have been in jail - mother as well as her brood - serving lengthy stretches, and absolutely thankful that the death penalty has been abolished in the UK!  
 
Let's look at that assertion more closely. By any constructive definition of the term mother, Liz Windsor is and has always from the first moment she produced her sprogs, been an undeniably and utterly lousy parent, while additionally being a distinctly reprehensible and responsible enabler of her brats' wrongdoing; in particular those of het love child, and equally her favourite, thoroughly spoilt and predictably arrogant brat Andrew! Self-evidently therefore, unless you're a brainwashed or braindead brownnoser, having Kids when it came to Elizabeth Windsor and her kind, was purely an economic exercise to keep their hereditary and taxpayers funded "Firm" intact and continuously going.  
 
A more dysfunctional family than that of Liz Windsor you couldn't sensibly ask for or realistically expect to find! Multiple divorces infest the lot of them; and among Liz Windsor's own offspring of 4, THREE of them have been divorced; attendant in all of their personal and specific cases with innumerable licentious and adulterous affairs over lengthy and ongoing periods  of time and with their resultant bastard and privately concealed from general public knowledge, bastard offspring.  
 
Curious though that while the hereditary sycophants and brownnosers are publicly claiming that Harry isn't Charles' child and quite adamant that Liz and Charles should insist on a DNA test where Harry is concerned, the same brownnosers aren't similarly demanding for a DNA test on Anne's children! The same Anne who's had more jumps than the horses she's ridden on, including those with her Metropolitan Police guard lover, PETER CROSS that she personally notified of her ensuing labour on her way to the hospital and again immediately after the birth of her daughter. I leave you to judge for yourself what married woman would do this with a lover, even before her husband was notified of the birth of her child, except for one reason only! Also, of course  there was Anne ongoing affair with Camilla's husband. Nothing like keeping it in the family, eh?  
 
Charles' secretive bastard offspring also come into the equation; round the block Camilla's offspring; and even Liz's own love child Andrew. But these brownnosing sycophants with their selective hatred towards Harry, intensified by their entrenched and orchestrated racism towards Meghan  self-evidently don't or wouldn't want any intrusive and certifiably held DNA tests on those they brainwashingly hero worship, would they?  
 
Add to the aforementioned these Windsors dodgy financial deals; the selling of titles to wealthy Arabs and Russian billionaires, while simultaneously claiming to be more sacrosanct than the Blessed Virgin Mary herself! Then factor in their long and close, intimate personal relationships with people who were irrefutably paedophiles. Charles and Jimmy Savile's 32 years old continuous relationship; and the same Charles equally longstanding one with the Church of England, convicted paedophile Bishop Peter Ball. Not to overlook the astonishing fact that Jimmy Savile had the full and unchecked run of Buckingham Palace - not dissimilar from MICHAEL FAGAN in another context until he was accidentally and rather embarrassingly found out - and all the other Windsor palatial dwellings!  
 
And, of course, Andrew's close relationship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his trafficker and enabler Ghislaine Maxwell. And coupled with all that and the other nefarious activities surrounding Liz Windsor's enabling of Philip's rampant adultery so she could likewise have carte blanche to do as she pleased. And which, contrary to her dishonest and disingenuous public posturing, she damned well did!  
 
Then Charles' abominable treatment of Diana.  Deceiving a naive and very unworldly-wis, innocent young girl, for that's what Diana essentially was, into thinking that he loved her when clearly he didn't, so that he Charles Windsor could have a bona fide virgin  - Diana enforcedly had to have a vaginal test and an accompanying medical examination, and then also provide irrefutable proof that she was a virgin capable of and also eligible - to conceive this arrogant, narcissistic and odious misogynistic Charles' heir and spare; as frankly, though sexually besotted with Camilla, Charles obviously, as well as his mother Liz knew they couldn't trust Camilla in that "trustworthy' role or department even though like Charles she was also single; as apart from with Charles, Camilla had been well lubricated by others and far more liberally so than that Royal Mail bicyclist's bike chain.  
 
His mission however repulsively accomplished with Diana, this odious and toxic piece of human faeces, Charles Windsor, dropped all his bogus pretences towards Diana. Imagine how the poor woman felt at this dreadful betrayal of her. Any half decent woman let alone a fully fledged one would naturally and quite understandably have wanted revenge. And who with any sense of human empathy, compassion or basic morality could blame her? So would any father, brother, sister, close relative of a woman treated in this fashion that Diana was most callously done by Charles and Camilla! For it wasn't only the betrayal of THREE in Diana's marital bed but also the arrogant and callously insulting behaviour by Charles towards Diana, as he continued his licentious and public adultery with Camilla even after she got married.  
 
And no support whatever from the charlatan Spencer family, more concerned with their connections to the Windsors and not endangering these than giving Diana the comfort and support she desperately needed. Now they're the very ones wanting to monetarily capitalize on Diana's murder and the historical revisionist perspective of it. Claiming that Diana was coerced or tricked into giving that BBC interview. A damned lie!  Diana acted as she did of her own volition as she got no support from the Windsors or the Spencer families, and therefore had every right to publicly tell her story. And intelligent people globally realise, accept and applaud her courage and determination. Which prompts the obvious question? Unless you're a slag, slapper or happy to be the doormat of a misogynistic narcissist like Charles Windsor, what would you have done in the invidious situation in which Diana helplessly found herself? Or is your ass-licking to the Saxe-Coburg-Gothe-Mountbatten-Windsor far more important than principles: assuming that you've got any that is!  
 
But the deviant bullies that Charles and his family are they couldn't bear Diana exposing their public false facade not the thought either of Diana finding love and thus creating an independent life of her own; and in their institutionally as well as individually racist mindset, having Diana do that with someone who wasn't  WHITE,  was for the Saxe-Coburg-Gothe-Mountbatten-Windsors well beyond the pale. And as such they decided that Diana had to be got rid off. And as the de facto the leader of this Mafia Klan Liz Windsor was a principal enabler in Diana's demise!  
 
And if criminal Liz Windsor of Reading, or Tilehurst Berkshire and her equally criminal family had done what this Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg-Gothe-Mountbatten-Windsor personally enabled, encouraged and facilitated, that entire Berkshire family, taking into account that we no longer have the death penalty in the UK, would all be doing, and deservedly so, long stretches in prison. Which is precisely where Liz, Charles and the rest of them should be. But in class ridden, non-meritocratic and brownnosing sycophantic Britain, at all levels, with brainwashed, braindead and intellectually challenged scum claiming most asininely and egregiously that it's their CULTURE, that won't happen!  
 
As for William, with his dishonest and laughable PR piffle about Diana,  he's no different from his useless father Charles and just as adulterous. So how about asking William, against the widespread backdrop of all your discernibly ugly, thoroughly hate filled rabidly racist and delusional comments about Harry and Meghan's children, about having a DNA test on his mistress' baby daughter and then furnishing the public with the irrefutable results? No, I didn't think you'd be in agreement with that. William after all is now a Stockholm Syndrome dupe and an aficionado of the Saxe-Coburg-Gothe-Mountbatten-Windsors, and because of that and his racist hatred of Meghan and disgust at Harry for marrying and actually loving her, you therefore as the racists that you similarly are, approve of this braindead clown William. Moreover, hypocrites like yourselves do like to dish out their toxic venom but can't, like the cowardly bullies that they are, can't take their own medicine.  
 
Kate Middleton may have severed her relationship with William's mistress but she's not going to ditch William while the  British monarchy debateably lasts, as Kate is your classic social climbing and inured Stepford wife broodmare, which Charles expected Diana to be; but your mother wasn't going to allow herself to become that, William. And is one of the dastardly reasons why Diana was murdered.  
 
As with everything that I embark on I accordingly, quite meticulously, do my detailed research. And my sources are not only impeccable but also longstandingly trustworthy. So unapologetically I'll categorically state that the late Diana Spencer, Princess of Wales was murdered! And what you personally think, other than an objective perspective on this matter, is of no concern or relevance to me.  
 
But I'll close with this comment in the Daily Mail, dated 26 October 2021, by a regular commenter there calling himself JOHNNY LONGSHOT who also uses multiple pseudonyms. This is what he wrote relative to Netflix's plans to dramatize Diana's death. And I quote.  
 
"This should not be aired. [And] I hope the [UK] security services bump off the producers of this programme".  
 
This wasn't just wishful thinking or hyperbolic bravado! I know a viable threat when I see, read or hear one. That the Daily Mail allowed this comment to pass and it wasn't reported to the police when lesser and rather facile ones readily and even urgently are, says it all!