I see you didn't make the list of global influencers, Jan Moir!

 
By Stanley Collymore  
 
With all the excess baggage that  
trollops like you well into your  
so problematic, menopause  
stage of your distinctively pathetic,  
distinctly useless, and irrefutably  
avariciously self-serving lives do
carry Jan Moir, it's categorically  
hardly any unsurprising thing.  
And furthermore, maliciously  
on your twisted part Ms Moir  
the sick irony of what you're  
doing is actually staggering.  
Meghan Markle spuriously  
denounced distinctly, by a  
facile nobody, like you, as  
not influential - Jan Moir?  
 
Really? Thus the reason, that  
the Daily Mail rag, together  
with clearly considerably  
intellectually challenged cretins  
like you Jan Moir who work for  
it daily publish several stories  
about the said Meghan so as  
to actually acquire, by doing  
so; distinctively desperately    
necessary urgently needed  
relevance; and, discernibly  
so; in cases quite like your  
own,  Jan Moir, to sordidly  
and luxuriantly, feed this  
racially; alt-right agenda;  
and readily, additionally  
to all that your far-right  
and rather significantly  
noxious, troll followers.  
 
And equally so, feed your  
allegedly hardened and  
likewise, longstanding  
addicted cocaine habit quite in  
conjunction with paying your  
every day bills Jan Moir. For  
if, as you so contradictorily  
rant, Meghan Markle isn't  
the least bit influential to  
anyone; why the bloody  
Hell then, are both you  
and,  your distinctively  
affected, also fittingly,  
braindead cretins, so  
evidently, infatuated  
and firmly obsessed  
as you distinctly are
wiith Meghan then?  
 
Wouldn't basic commonsense  
alone logically dictate that  
realistically, you ideally  
and purposely rather studiously  
ignore Meghan completely, Jan  
Moir? Rather than, repeatedly  
as you do, keep on writing all  
these stories of yours clearly  
so ad nauseam of someone    
you characterize constantly  
as a nobody and noxiously  
publicly state, that no one  
is at all interested, in her?
Why then the compulsive  
interest, and its surfeit of  
of your articles Jan Moir?  
Makes no sense at all to  
me, to be very viciously  
berating someone that  
distinctly, by your own  
rationale, is irrelevant.  
 
Enlighten me and my readers  
Jan Moir on the essence of  
relevancy. Do you, go to  
the lavatory, basically to have a  
piss; shit; or a necessary wank  
of your menopausal pussy or  
Incidentally because that loo  
is there and can accordingly  
be used randomly? Just like  
your malicious, and clearly  
unwarranted, sick attacks  
on Meghan - so expected  
as is especially cognizant  
with ingrained prats, like  
you! Realistically, do you
get my general drift Jan?  
 
Instead  there you constantly  
are Jan Moir: a thoroughly  
and inimical but ineptly  
odiously menopausal  
and distinctly evil, meddling cow masquerading as a newspaper  
columnist for a rabid Nazi rag  
like the Daily Mail; and really  
someone afraid to honestly  
and clearly very objectively  
look yourself frankly; plus  
your well-used and often  
displayed; sexually worn  
body in a mirror literally  
from shame, of various  
now visible, and clearly  
mentally induced scars  
sexual and drug abuse  
rampantly subjected it  
to over multiple years.
And how do you seek  
to cope Jan Moir? You  
adopt and embrace a  
sickening preference,  
to batter others with  
whom, you basically  
are vastly inferior to  
in every meaningful  
way; and, with your  
racist obsession, all  
genuine intelligent,
natural motivators;  
aptly, like Meghan!  
 
(C) Stanley V. Collymore  
17 September 2021.  
 
 
Author's Remarks:  
Respect, and something I was taught and rather happily learnt from my earliest childhood in Barbados, is a commodity that has to be positively earned; but, even so, the recipient of it must readily and continuously be in a qualitative state to even access such recognition, far less so acquire it.  
 
And the significance of all this, is that assumed birthright, accorded and invariably unwarranted privilege and/or social status; the amassing of enormous financial resources  and the attendant social influence there of, and even acquired firm political and societal power do not of themselves equate to a true situation of assured respect if the basic components of respect itself -  evidently having not been genuinely earned - aren't met in the first place and rather rigorously retained.  
 
Since all else  literally amounts to nothing more than self-serving, brainwashed and even braindead sycophancy; where nepotism, cronyism, fervent social climbing and a personally assumed privileged entitlement become the entrenched bedrock of a delusional society whose normal conduct then becomes that of a most markedly dysfunctional state, of the kind that the United Kingdom pathetically is.  
 
There are obviously numerous cases of this sort of thing but all the same here are two clear cut examples I'll use to characterize and adequately exemplify what I'm advocating. Jan Moir: most publicly and vitriolically abusing Meghan Markle - easy to do so when you're actually yourself an ingrained racist who's essentially preaching to similarly endemic racist trolls - as Jan Moir customarily does without a shred of objective evidence to even minutely so support her ludicrously stated and ingrained obsession.  
 
Asininely, as usual, Jan Moir quite simply asserts that Meghan Markle who was recently featured in Times Magazine as an influential global figure is in effect really nothing whatsoever of the kind. Jan Moir is, of course, totally entitled to her own subjective opinion. However, when without a shred of  objective evidence or any substantive proof to corroborate what she's quite fallaciously spouting, Jan Moir then blithely goes on to state that Meghan is not, never was, or will she ever be an influential figure, of any kind, to anybody anywhere, and furthermore that no one ever takes any notice of her; and thus maliciously, asserts does Jan Moir, that Meghan is effectively and most resoundingly a nobody!  
 
Really? And all this coming from the same Jan Moir who as a columnist at the Daily Mail rag, which she works for, quite literally continuously keeps on writing story after story about the publicly declared by her, supposedly nobody person  Meghan Markle. And prompts the obvious and intelligent question; why?  For how can you Jan Moir remotely logically, much less so intelligently, yet prostituting the craft of journalism, still revered by proper journalists like me, claim someone as in your obviously malevolently cited case of Meghan Markle to be actually irrelevant; yet, and as Meghan clearly doesn't give interviews or even relate what she is planning on doing to the media and distinctively not rags like the Daily Mail that she has previously taken to court and won against, quite literally and so profusely, as you Jan Moir on its behalf so often and keenly do, rather pathetically go rummaging through the distinctly positive stories on Meghan Markle which are carried in international publications, to then with your embedded racist and quite twisted agenda, essay to malevolently debunk what has been positively said about Meghan Markle.  
 
But just like Charles Windsor and his lot that you basically sycophantically obsess with Jan Moir - and truthfully, I really don't know of a single person of genuine intellectual acumen who thinks that family is generally bright, and the same objectively has to be said personally about you Jan Moir! So my simple advice to you Jan Moir is just this; go and seriously see about your quite evidently acute, post menopausal traumas. And logically leave Meghan and her reciprocally loving and happy husband Harry and their joint family to conduct their lives as they suitably, morally and legally care to.  
 
My second chosen lowlife British specimen is Piers Morgan. Having acquired a new job in broadcasting he claims, what does he instinctively do? This prized narcissist  and bullying jerk intentionally goes to the same pub where those several years ago now he met Meghan Markle for the very first time, specifically to announce his "new job" to the media.  
 
But crucially and significantly it's not really about this new job that he's actually there or to elaborate on. Oh no! It's all about Meghan and how he's actually going to cause her in his own distinct words numerous "sleepless nights". Rather obviously in Piers Morgan's sick and  twisted mind the kind which he quite evidently  wanted to distinctively, sexually occasion Meghan all those many years ago but that she discernibly wanted none of it. And the egoist that Piers Morgan patently is he simply cannot stand rejection. So consequently Meghan Markle and revenge against her for having the sheer audacity - and particularly so being African American and, as such, a woman of colour -  to actually reject him: a master race white man as he sees himself,  and his sexual overtures towards him. And ever since then and also most categorically and obsessively so Piers Morgan has undoubtedly assured that Meghan Markle has absolutely, and for him essentially lived crucially rent free in his own head and still literally does!    
 
Meghan Markle, meanwhile, is a happily married woman and with a family she absolutely adores. For his part Piers Morgan is similarly married but quite discernibly to an effete, not in the very least either invigorating or stimulating woman but, all the same, an aptly, rather obsessively social climbing and a most deferential prat relative to the instinctive accommodating of her husband's distinctly blatant philandering; wife Celia Walden.  
 
Very strong similarities here between Piers Morgan a staunch sycophant of the Windsor Klan and Charles - both men marrying women they evidently weren't or aren't in love with while at the same time obsessed with another woman. Specifically in Charles' case it was Camilla and in Piers Morgan's that person is irrefutably Meghan Markle. The fundamental difference however being, that Princess Diana undeniably had the courage and determination to do something effective and distinctly positive about her invidious state of affairs. Celia Walden, unlike Princess Diana,  quite categorically has no such redeeming qualities about her, and it accounts for why she willingly stays with an odiously narcissistic, bullying and also a discernibly demented womanizing yet rabidly misogynistic pillock like her husband Piers Morgan.  
 
So the only sleepless nights that I can realistically envisage, and which are occasioned by Piers Morgan, with or without, his new job, are the ones he callously inflicts on his wife Celia Walden.  As like most allegedly macho, white, British males he rolls off her after the standard FIVE minutes shag; turns his back on her, and quickly thereafter falls asleep. Then, while clearly assured that her husband/man is asleep this wife/white woman quietly climbs out of bed, repairs impatiently but necessarily to the loo; and whilst there swiftly but patently assiduously embarks on cleaning her vagina. Then on the completion of this very essential task - getting rid of the semen perfunctorily and lovelessly squirted into her - washes her face, thoroughly dries herself and returns to bed.  
 
There with her back decidedly turned to her white husband or man's inert body this white wife or woman unavoidably but silently cries herself to sleep. And that Piers Morgan is realistically the only "sleepless nights" that you are going to engender. Those, quite literally, inside your own  marital bedroom!