deepundergroundpoetry.com
A NEW MIRACLE IN SYRIA
A NEW MIRACLE IN SYRIA
They gathered on Saint Mary's Day
in the Chaldean church to pray.
A statue of Saint Mary stood
in its alcove where people hymned.
All of a sudden they could not
behold the statue as a light
emerged from it and filled its site
and all the people were awestruck.
They photographed that great event.
I saw the picture, it increased
my faith as that of the church priests
with all the people who were there.
What can we say about you, Lourdes
and Fatima and various towns
where Mary appeared and assured
that what her Son says is quite right?
BY JOSEPH ZENIEH
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
____________________________________
.
They gathered on Saint Mary's Day
in the Chaldean church to pray.
A statue of Saint Mary stood
in its alcove where people hymned.
All of a sudden they could not
behold the statue as a light
emerged from it and filled its site
and all the people were awestruck.
They photographed that great event.
I saw the picture, it increased
my faith as that of the church priests
with all the people who were there.
What can we say about you, Lourdes
and Fatima and various towns
where Mary appeared and assured
that what her Son says is quite right?
BY JOSEPH ZENIEH
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
____________________________________
.
Published 10th Sep 2021
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 0
reading list entries 0
comments 8
reads 440
Commenting Preference:
The author encourages honest critique.
"What can we say about you, Lourdes
and Fatima and various towns
where Mary appeared and assured
that what her Son says is quite right?"
Sorry, but no. Neither at Lourdes nor at Fatima nor at the Hill of Tepeyac nor at Soufanieh, Damascus nor (to my knowledge) anywhere else where "Mary" has been reported to have made an appearance
did "she" say anything about Jesus' teaching, let alone about how "what Jesus says [sic]" (about what, BTW? ) was in any way "right". If you have evidence to the contrary, please present it.
And assuming that the Syrian apparition that you are speaking about is the one claimed to have occurred at Soufanieh, what is your source that says that the Syrian appearance of "Mary" was witnessed by anyone other than Myrna Nazzour?
and Fatima and various towns
where Mary appeared and assured
that what her Son says is quite right?"
Sorry, but no. Neither at Lourdes nor at Fatima nor at the Hill of Tepeyac nor at Soufanieh, Damascus nor (to my knowledge) anywhere else where "Mary" has been reported to have made an appearance
did "she" say anything about Jesus' teaching, let alone about how "what Jesus says [sic]" (about what, BTW? ) was in any way "right". If you have evidence to the contrary, please present it.
And assuming that the Syrian apparition that you are speaking about is the one claimed to have occurred at Soufanieh, what is your source that says that the Syrian appearance of "Mary" was witnessed by anyone other than Myrna Nazzour?
11th Sep 2021 00:54am
"A statue of Saint Mary stood
in its alcove where people hymned."
Wow. Given what an alcove is (a small space in a room, formed by one part of a wall being farther back than the parts on each side [ https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/alcov]) and the fact that it was occupied by a statue of Mary, I'm surprised that anyone could fit there, let alone a group of hymn singers! It must have been a very tight squeeze.
in its alcove where people hymned."
Wow. Given what an alcove is (a small space in a room, formed by one part of a wall being farther back than the parts on each side [ https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/alcov]) and the fact that it was occupied by a statue of Mary, I'm surprised that anyone could fit there, let alone a group of hymn singers! It must have been a very tight squeeze.
11th Sep 2021 9:45am
Why do you criticize only Joseph Zenieh?
I don't find anything is worth answering in your comment.
I don't find anything is worth answering in your comment.
11th Sep 2021 12:58pm
So you lied when you claimed that at Lourdes and Fatima and at other places "Mary" was perceived as speaking about what Jesus "says" and how "right" it was/is?.
11th Sep 2021 1:56pm
I never lie. I left lying to other people. But l consider all your above criticism is mere grudges, and l won't take you seriously if you don't tell me in a convincing way why you criticise only Joseph Zenieh.
Your claims about what "Mary" said are false. For you to say that at Lourdes and Fatima she spoke about Jesus and how what he "says" (why the present tense?) is right is an outright falsehood and an intentional misrepresentation of what is recorded as having happened there..
And what would be a "convincing way" of telling you why I criticize only you, even assuming that that's the case or has any relevance for determining whether what I say about your submissions is valid or not?
And let me remind you that the motive behind someone's posting remarks about your submissions does not invalidate the truth of those remarks. They are either true or false on their own terms.
And what would be a "convincing way" of telling you why I criticize only you, even assuming that that's the case or has any relevance for determining whether what I say about your submissions is valid or not?
And let me remind you that the motive behind someone's posting remarks about your submissions does not invalidate the truth of those remarks. They are either true or false on their own terms.
11th Sep 2021 2:18pm
Before telling me the convincing truth about why you criticise only Joseph Zenieh, l will consider all your criticism nill.
"Before telling me the convincing truth about why you criticise only Joseph Zenieh, l will consider all your criticism nill."
How convenient! With your request for a "convincing truth" you've given yourself a way out of ever making plain what is plain -- i.e., that you are unable to demonstrate that my criticisms are off the mark , since you can always claim that any response I give to your stipulation is never "convincing" enough!
But your request is grounded in an untenable assumption since you are NOT the only one here on DUP whose postings I've criticized. And no, I won't offer you proof that this is the case. It's your job to support your claim that you are the only person here whose postings I've addressed.
BTW, if you were setting up the condition under which you would regard my criticisms as worth considering, you should have written "UNTIL you give me the convincing truth about why you criticise only Joseph Zenieh, l will consider all your criticism NIL.
Nill is a verb that when used without an object means "to be unwilling" and when used with an object means "to refuse or reject."
https://www.askdifference.com/nill-vs-nil/
How convenient! With your request for a "convincing truth" you've given yourself a way out of ever making plain what is plain -- i.e., that you are unable to demonstrate that my criticisms are off the mark , since you can always claim that any response I give to your stipulation is never "convincing" enough!
But your request is grounded in an untenable assumption since you are NOT the only one here on DUP whose postings I've criticized. And no, I won't offer you proof that this is the case. It's your job to support your claim that you are the only person here whose postings I've addressed.
BTW, if you were setting up the condition under which you would regard my criticisms as worth considering, you should have written "UNTIL you give me the convincing truth about why you criticise only Joseph Zenieh, l will consider all your criticism NIL.
Nill is a verb that when used without an object means "to be unwilling" and when used with an object means "to refuse or reject."
https://www.askdifference.com/nill-vs-nil/
