deepundergroundpoetry.com

Charles Windsor: As useful as a chocolate screwdriver but still desperate to be king!

 
By Stanley Collymore

Notwithstanding all the trolls
and manipulated fawners  
that the rest of us who  
do think for ourselves are happily  
avoiding as we carry on living in  
the 21st Century.  So, what's my
beef I hear you ask, with this
medieval mindset man who  
quite sickeningly just can't  
wait for his mother to die  
most  critically so, simply
that he could then duly  
become an hereditary  
monarch, of Britain?
Some love that I say
rather sarcastically  
for a woman, who
for the customary  
standard term of  
quite simply her
first pregnancy  
naturally, bore
you safely out  
her womb! A
significantly  
first for her.

But that is distinctly nothing  
is it Charlie boy, compared
to the plum job, you have
always really selfishly desired and
which is very crucially connected  
with being, in your case, the king  
astride a hereditary monarchy.
Even that though you messed  
up most spectacularly! Since  
you Charles very deliberate  
with Camilla, are certainly  
personally so, responsible  
for Diana's tragedy every  
bit as the rabid vultures  
around you. For clearly  
you have intentionally  
Charles demonstrably  
idiotically enveloped  
yourself with risibly  
unctuous toadies all  
proffering so-called  
advice and wilfully  
surely making you  
unfit, for any kind  
of truly intelligent  
evaluation which  
can be tabulated  
 decision making.

An arrant fool and a thick
Clown Prince in sensible  
words, Charles! Clearly  
persuaded not to marry Camilla  
when you were both free to do
so, you accepted your stooges  
intimation to actually marry  
a young, innocent and aptly  
a most virginal broodmare  
to rather obviously supply  
your own children; while
equally you and Camilla:
even on that night prior  
to your hailed wedding  
to Diana, scheduled for  
the following day, you
happily and cynically  
then, so subsequently  
and wilfully,  actually  
adulterously solidly
sustained what was  
previously going on!

Fully abhorrent in every
way! Yes, people have
dishonest affairs for  
all sorts of pathetic reasons and  
sometimes none. But to clearly  
con a young, and so evidently  
naive woman into marrying  
you, on the assumption that
you loved her - that clearly  
wasn't the truth - basically  
so, you could egotistically  
have your legal kids by a
virgin while dishonestly  
and ongoingly shagging  
somebody else that has
been around the block
several times, but was
fully apprised of, and
aptly approving also
of what you were so
collaboratively, and
purposefully, evilly  
doing Charles does  
make you and also
Camilla absolutely  
abhorrent, amoral  
and insidiously as
well toxic caitiffs!

You've caused egregious, and
irreparable harm to Diana  
and her children and for  
which you evidently haven't so  
much as proffered far less so
given a sincere apology for  
what you clearly did. And
yet despite all of this the
idiot toadies passionate  
in their zeal to deliver  
what they usually do  
through convincing  
you all their many  
ideas were safely  
solely your own.  

Like proselytizing the proud  
fact, that on you becoming  
King you are judiciously  
intent on trimming down the  
monarchy - but in actuality  
it's an insincere stratagem  
to guarantee that both of
your inimitably, and as  
well clearly perceived  
by you, pivotal Nigger  
ethnicity grand kids:
Archie and younger  
Sibling Lilibet, will
never definitively  
be then prince or
princess of your
so non-diversity
racist realm; as  
those identical  
stooges strong  
because your
folly, is their  
lighting rod,
are out and
abou, ludicrously  
but distinctly do
vain gloriously  
and asininely  
painting you  
basically, as
a distinctly  
blameless  
demigod.
Yet, very
logically
not the
reality!

(C) Stanley V. Collymore  
4 July 2021.


Author's Remarks:
Planning, you say Charles, on paring down the British monarchy? That's like a male Anglican or Roman Catholic paedophile priest declaring that they'll give up such proclivities for the period of Lent  - and there are many of those whom you well know Charles; and anyone with a functioning brain in their head, and who knows how to sensibly use it, knows full well what your racist dog whistle means relative to this monarchy paring down malarkey.

You have been obsessed with becoming king all of your pathetic life Charles; so it makes no difference one way or the other to me, as I'm an entrenched meritocrat living in the 21st Century and not a prized privileged white idiot existing with a Dark Ages mindset as you're psychologically clearly doing Charles; and consequently my own mindset accords perfectly well with the best elements of the 21st Century, accordingly.

How long the UK will carry on in its current situation is anybody's guess; but the Commonwealth, which the likes of you Charles like to delude yourselves is a British empire Mark 2 is rapidly evolving and fast moving away from the deference that it previously paid to the British monarchy.

Terra nuliius,  indigenous peoples genocidal, convict and still criminally mindset Australia, New Zealand and Canada will in all likelihood  stay quite faithfully and fawningly so, to their kith and kin brethren in Britain, and accordingly might very well carry  on having the Mountbatten Windsors as their monarchs; but most of the Commonwealth countries are already republics, and those that aren't are opting to become so. All but the Useful Idiots few who have probably never heard Bob Marley's Reggae inspirational song: Liberate yourself from mental slavery.  

But whichever way you look at it Charles, it's a safe bet that your mother, and the incumbent Queen, will be the last voluntarily recognized titular Head of State of an ongoing Commonwealth. And with your bloody obsession on being King of Britain, who's to say that you Charles doesn't thankfully pre-decease your own mother, whom you so much want dead, just so you can become king. Personally, I hope she continues living for another 25-30 years or so. And if you want my further opinion she lots a lot younger than you and that hag of yours Camilla!

Besides, I don't know if you're cognizant of this fact, but Idi A.in became President of Uganda: a Commonwealth country, when the democratically elected President Milton Obote was deposed in a coup with the explicit and active cooperation of Britain; and M16 were the organizers of that bloodless coup on the specific orders of the then UK government.  
Why did this happen? Because President Milton Obote had secured enough votes among the Commonwealth countries to kick Britain out of the Commonwealth for a number of things, including its staunch support for apartheid South Africa. Britain couldn't afford to be subjected to such ignominy and so President Milton  had to go; just in time before the upcoming Commonwealth members Heads of State meeting that among other things would have seen Britain ousted from the same Commonwealth that it then, and still to this day likes to see as its own Mark 2 British empire.  

Most ironically it didn't take long for Idi Amin, who the Brits had replaced President Milton Obote by, to turn on the British. Britain during its empire heyday had taken millions of Asians from the Indian Subcontinent to Africa to act as their Useful Idiots in subverting the indigenous African peoples. Most of this migration of indentured Asians was in East Africa. With Britain's collaboration these Asians systemically practised racism against these Blacks and because there weren't enough whites these Asians were with the UK's encouragement and legal enticement given jobs and positions that Blacks were barred from in their own native countries.

When after World 2, in which many of these same Blacks, who'd fought, risked their lives for and even died for Britain, got their independence and with these Asians still holding commanding positions across these countries but resolutely cling on to their BRITISH passports , even though none of them had ever seen Britain let alone set foot there; these newly independent Black East African states opened out the hand of friendship to these Asian interlopers.

They were offered full citizenship in these African countries along with retaining their British citizenship; but they all declined, resolutely clinging to their British one, yet holding premier jobs in a diversity of fields within these African countries that were denying indigenous Africans access up the ladder of Meritocracy in their own countries.

Resentment naturally started to grow among the African and the several governments gave these Asians a time lime of 10 years to make up their minds whether they wanted to become citizens of these countries and carry on being successful, or else doggedly hold on to their British citizenship.

That deadline passed an so did another 10 years, and so the African leadership told them bluntly: you can't carry on living in our country, profitably making your living doing so yet not even basically identify with the country or the people who're here? Get out!  

Idi Amin realising a good thing when he saw it, and how it could bolster his popularity, capitalized on it, as did all the other East African countries. Suddenly Britain was in a quandary; the UK regime, its parliament, the media and British people no more wanted these Asians in Britain than the same Asians wanted to be citizens of African countries. Britain then tried to bribe these African countries, who weren't having of it. These Asians had to go, they all declared!

Shit scared from all stand points as these Asians massively arrived in the UK with their British passports and citizenship, the rest of the world laughingly looked on. What would Britain do now? Well, with less than a week the UK government  - both houses - passed legislation preventing any more of these Asians entering the country and literally purposely turning British citizens into stateless refugees; the ones, that is, who didn't make it in time. It was another piece of notoriety for the UK, as that anti- East African Asian law was the fastest piece of legislation to become law in the entirr history of the UK - clearing both the House of Commons and the House of Lords with the RACIST alacrity that it did.

AND A RECORD THAT IT STILL TO THIS DAY NOTORIOUSLY HOLDS!

Preti Patel's parents were among those who just made the deadline by just hours. After that they would have been barred from the UK, and Preti - assuming that she would ever have been conceived - would have been born elsewhere. And this odious, racist and coconut bitch - the incumbent Home Secretary of the UK - is more rightwing than Margaret Thatcher who was most instrumental in stopping her own fellow British Asians settling in the UK; and who Priti Patel by her own demented admission, is a firm admirer of. The equivalent of an offspring whose mum was freed from the gas ovens at Auschwitz by Russian soldiers, not thanking them, but effusively instead praising the Third Reich and wanting to be like Herr Adolf Hitler. That's the state of sick Britain and its Useful Idiots!

The Commonwealth to reiterate my earlier remarks is not the British empire Mark 2 however much you want to delude yourself that it is Charles, but instead is a group of countries  - some of them ex UK  colonies others not so - that voluntarily chose to have the monarch of the UK - but not everlastingly so, and they're fully at liberty to alter this concept if they choose to  - as their titular, not statutory, head. So get that right!  

However, most of the Commonwealth is located in the Global South and the overwhelming majority of its population is non-white. And they've seen How Meghan: an African American woman,  and Harry have been racially treated and vitriolically abused; how you Charles have obsessed about the possible skin colour of their offspring  - did you do the as regards William and Kate's sprogs? Or those of any of the Windsor children? Thought not!

And these Commonwealth citizens and their leaders look at the non diversity ethos at Buckingham Palace and the other palatial residences your lot occupy Charles, and sickeningly too that you are the only lot in the entire UK that lobbied for and strong armed successive UK governments to permanently exempt your lot from the Race Relations Acts and other allied legislation; and now we have you Charles Windsor with your concerted racist dog whistles, relative to Meghan and Harry's  children: Archie and Lilibet, to other likeminded racist and haters, so you can get some cheap relevance for yourself and Camilla?

Why in the face of all that would any decent non-white Commonwealth country and its citizens want a privileged, pathetic, old racist white man  - or his similary mindset elder son William - both if you obsessed with being king of a United Kingdom politically in a perilous state, to be their titular head of state? Go figure that out Charlie boy!

Oh, and by the way, the unwritten UK constitution doesn't allow for two monarchs to be reigning simultaneously, so for William to become King you'll have to be dead Charles! And for a man obsessed with power and titular prestige, how does that grab you Charles, when most decent people want and relish their loved one, and especially so their parents who brought them into the world, living a long and healthy life? Not so apparently, if you're a hereditary mindset junkie!
Written by Academic
Published
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 0 reading list entries 0
comments 0 reads 264
Commenting Preference: 
The author encourages honest critique.

Latest Forum Discussions
COMPETITIONS
Today 4:46am by wallyroo92
COMPETITIONS
Today 4:45am by wallyroo92
SPEAKEASY
Today 4:08am by SweetKittyCat5
POETRY
Today 3:59am by Abracadabra
COMPETITIONS
Today 3:56am by Honeybeevee
SPEAKEASY
Today 3:34am by brokentitanium