How the Crown's portrayal is self-servingly and callously being used to deflect attention away from Diana's murder!

        
By Stanley Collymore          
       
Just ask your dad Charles and        
Stepmom, Camilla what did        
happen then William. And          
perhaps you'll be lucky that they     won't lie to you as they actually       obviously did to your mother          
Diana! For this crap of yours          
is nowt more than a classic          
Buckingham Palace trick.        
Trying to very cynically          
deflect attention totally          
from an outstandingly          
poignant, but equally          
major embarrassing          
Crown's unleashing          
and focus attention          
instead, on Martin          
Bashir  - and also the BBC.        
Completely dishonestly,        
and odiously publicly          
so, lyingly inventing          
your scapegoats for          
what happened to          
a corralled Diana          
then blaming all          
on them, not on        
your damaging          
wicked selves!        
       
(C) Stanley V. Collymore        
20 November 2020.        
       
       
Author's Remarks:        
The Martin Bashir interview was 25 years ago! Why the furore now over it Buckingham Palace? As if the non-fawning, discernibly intelligent too, and conscionably moral residents in the UK  - and ourselves very much in the minority in 21st Century Britain  - aren't actually aware of what you're doing, and why? This dishonest crap of yours will undeniably be music to the ears of intellectually challenged, manifestly obsequious Little England Brexiteers and manifestly delusional psycopathic, obviously wannabe USA dictator Donald Drumpf, aficionados but no one with a functioning brain!        
       
Did Diana want to do the interview? Yes! And for quite good reasons too! Furthermore, she was an adult not a child, and had freely not only made up her mind but also fully given her adult permission to do it. There was no coercion of her by Martin Bashir, and in legal terms that's irrefutably informed consent.        
       
Also, it gave Diana the valid right to tell the public at large about the farce of a marriage she was most cynically conned into from its very outset and also disastrously, most adulterously by her husband Charles - even on the night before he married her the next day - and similarly dehumanizing for her, and carried on throughout that bogus marriage on Charles' part. Summed up quite succinctly when unequivocally and painfully, Diana declared in that interview that there was always three persons in her marriage.        
       
A public acknowledgement that both incensed and totally embarrassed Buckingham Palace and its coterie of deeply involved and deceitful hypocrites, and was a principal contributory factor why Diana literally had to be got rid of and, accordingly, was murdered. A sickening state of affairs entirely  
condoned by an absolutely inured comprehensively toadying royalist plus a demonstrably discernibly idiotically, sick, post menopausal, wholly delusional, braindead and a purblind cunt Ingrid Seward  - who recently in that so repulsively sycophantic and distinctive, royal toadying of hers, that an identical fate - namely her murder - should similarly befall Meghan Markle!  
 
My instant riposte to that was swift, decidedly uncompromising and also unapologetic in a poem I wrote then about Ingrid Seward and remains unequivocally so . That poem can be found on this site. Meanwhile, I do recommend and earnestly wish that those who vilely desire to exploit Diana for their own sick nefarious purposes leave her be to rest in peace. And that's a clear exhortation too that I purposely unapologetically extend to Diana's, distinctly moronic and not too bright, elder son William!

Diana was neither worldly wise nor sexually experienced when her own sister Sarah that among others in her personal repertoire of lovers had had a sexual fling with Charles, and subsequently introduced the innocent Diana to her former lover, was quite expediently proposed to by Charles at the staged behest distinctly of the Windsor and Spencer families.

Not least so because Diana had in their sick and twisted notions all the right qualities: her youth, intact virginity and a biological link to the English nobility. Love, most definitely, was not a part of the equation, basically as the Saxe-Coburg-Gothe-Mountbatten-Windsor family don't do love. Their obligatory concerns being the absolute retention not only of their familial Firm - but as well the ongoing sickening and totally fictional notions of who and what they really are!

Besides in typical incestuously inbred fashion with this lot, Charles had also previously, at the behest of his family, been coerced to propose to his second cousin Amanda - Mountbatten's granddaughter - who sensibly refused his offer of marriage, stating to the press that she didn't "want to surrender herself to a system." Contrast that reasonable acceptance with the odious vitriol mendaciously levelled, and still is, at Meghan and Harry for doing the same as Amanda did. Twisted and rampant hypocrisy or what?

Marrying for love Diana quite naively expected her husband to reciprocate, if not all, at least some of that love. To her utter dismay Charles didn't! As he wasn't nor ever had been in love with Diana, and Camilla the woman whom he loved, and still does, he'd crucially been stopped from initially marrying. As such, Diana eventually and literally realized she was nothing more than just a broodmare to solidify Charles' family Firm! Both cynical and disgraceful in the extreme! And who but obsequious brown-nosers to these medieval, Dark Ages mindset scum can quite honestly blame Diana for how she reacted?

You, William, like you lascivious and serial adulterous grandfather Philip and your dad Charles, conjoined with likeminded members of both sexes in your two dysfunctional families, may well be delightfully happy, in spite of your own discernible bed hopping, to settle, as you've done with Catherine, for an obsessive, Stepford-type social climbing wife and broodmare as Kate distinctly is; but the stark truth is that your mother Diana wasn't that accommodating to this kind of insulting and dehumanizing behaviour. So my advice to you William is simply this: get a proper life and realistically move on!