Your Master

You have nothing except women throwing themselves between your arms and on your chest. Is that your great dream? How thoughtful you are!

"You have nothing except women throwing themselves between your arms and on your chest. Is that your great dream? How thoughtful you are!"

So ..  you want men throwing themselves into your arms?

This is how you understand it! How wonderful you are! Where are your great thoughts as a poet? I am not surprised that you are jealous of others, and you try to see their typos, and little blunders, trying to damage their images in the minds of other poets.

Sorry.  I must have missed the memo that says that people here have to abide by what you think the subject of their submissions should be.  I guess if we don't mention Jesus or how a world in the sky is our true home of misuse words like "endow" or don't speak apodictically and paternalistically about what leads to "men's" happiness or don't grammar gaffe noun-verb agreements or employ inversions to get rhymes, or riddle our submissions with syntactical mistakes,  we shouldn't post.  
 
And why would I or anyone who wished to write well  be jealous of pieces that repeatedly and undeniably contain -- as yours invariably do -- the marks of bad poetry, i.e.,  
   
grammar gaffes  
   
noun-verb disagreement,  
   
forced rhyme,  
   
solecisms,  
   
deixis,  
   
demonstrably false and/or question-begging statements/claims about the world, human nature,  well-springs of human action, misunderstandings and misrepresentations of texts [especially Biblical ones] that your submissions are based on,  
   
inversions of ordinary ways of speaking,    
   
sacrifices of sense in order to get a rhyme,    
   
sacrifices of syntactically necessary article use in order to maintain a particular rhythm,  
   
clumsy and clunky rhythm,    
   
misuse of and/or misunderstandings of the meanings of words that you have used within lines,  
   
a limited vocabulary  
   
overuse of the same words,  
   
strange, improper,  and illegitimate use of  punctuation,  
   
no use of concrete imagery or appeals to the senses,  
   
little use of metaphor or simile,    
   
overblown claims about the way the world works,    
   
questionable claims about what leads to human happiness,    
   
and are given titles the subject of which is not the subject of your text?  
 
And as to "damage[ing] their images in the minds of other poets",  you pretty well do this all on your own by writing the way you do.  Isn't that why your pieces get so few comments and that those that you do receive come from "poets" who show that they are lacking in the critical skills necessary to determine what effective and well-written poetry looks like?

It can only be said at just the right moment. And its said in a question of "will u keep me?"