THE TRINITY

What does "shelter to" mean?

And shouldn't your line "which looms up as a rhyme which charms my mind" read "which looms up as a rhyme THAT charms my mind."?

I see that you have changed "shelter to" to "shelter in".  Thanks for the implicit admission that you sometimes write poorly and are not as proficient in English grammar as you claim to be.

But another question arises from your claim that you "love this song".  You have not previously spoken of any song.  You've spoken of a word.  

"I find myself quite involved with my word  
which looms up as a rhyme which [sic] charms my mind."

A word is not a song.  Neither is a rhyme.

Once again you have engaged in poor writing.  

And what's the trinity you speak of?

Dear Baldwin,
With great love, l write to you, but you don't understand anything in this poem. I am sorry to say. I speak about the Holy Christian Trinity. I use myself and my poem as an example. The Word, the rhyme, the song ... etc are the Son, l mean JESUS CHRIST. Please forget your grudge, and try to understand it as a poem.

Jesus is NOT the Trinity.  According to Nicea and other statements from the Orthodox councils,  he is a person within it.  And while he is spoken of as the Logos (Word), he is never spoken of as the rhyme or as the song.  

And if you think it is clear that you are speaking of the Trinity of Christian theology,  you are severely mistaken.

And you call yourself a poet. I am really surprised.

So where in the writings of the Church Fathers or the pronouncements from the Ecumenical Councils on the persons in, and nature of,  the Trinity is Jesus said to be the whole of the Trinity?  Where is he described as the rhyme and the song?    

And the issue is not whether what I call myself is true,  but whether your claims about Jesus are true and whether** it is clear** that this piece is about the Christian doctrine of the Trinity i.e., that God is one God, but three coeternal consubstantial persons or hypostases, each distinct [the Father is not the Son, and the Holy Spirit is not the Father or the Son]  but having the same essence).

I love the triune nature of my verse
composed when I’m alone
where word and rhyme and metricality
combine
to make a poem oh so fine,
whose tone and vision's so sublime
it cannot help but lead undullish readers on
to see
that what I’m doing there
is really speaking incontrovertibly
(wink wink)
about the fact
that Jesus is
the Holy Trinity.

I enjoyed your poem, thank you for sharing some light!

To whom are you speaking?

Dear RubyRose,
Thank you very much for your very kind words. Of course this is my page, but Baldwin is doing everything to confuse me and the dear poets who write to me, so l kindly ask you, dear poets, to mention my name when you write something about my poems, and l ask Baldwin not to write what is supposed to be called his poetry on my page, but to write it on his page and tell me to read it there. He is causing a lot of confusion to me and to my readers. This is very mean of him, and not thanked for it.

"l ask Baldwin not to write what is supposed to be called his poetry on my page".

Please **demonstrate** how and why my piece above (which is a comment on your claims set out in verse) is not poetry.

It has all of the elements that **you yourself** have declared writing must have to be poetry.   So unless you work from a double standard,  your claim that it is not poetry is false.

Another take on what your piece says to me:

I want to share my tone.
But no one wants to see
or take upon themselves
the colour of my skin.
And so I find myself alone
composing verse
that will love me..