deepundergroundpoetry.com
PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
People are of different nature.
Some are worthy of their living.
They are strong and nothing scares them.
Danger for them means just nothing.
Life at times endows them little,
but they see this little plenty.
What is ugly appears splendid,
Thanking God for all His giving.
When in health, they cheer and rejoice,
making all around them happy.
When ill, they behold their illness
trifling though it may be serious.
BY JOSEPH ZENIEH
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
____________________________________
People are of different nature.
Some are worthy of their living.
They are strong and nothing scares them.
Danger for them means just nothing.
Life at times endows them little,
but they see this little plenty.
What is ugly appears splendid,
Thanking God for all His giving.
When in health, they cheer and rejoice,
making all around them happy.
When ill, they behold their illness
trifling though it may be serious.
BY JOSEPH ZENIEH
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
____________________________________
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 1
reading list entries 0
comments 12
reads 238
Commenting Preference:
The author encourages honest critique.
Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
2nd Jun 2020 5:03pm
To be syntactically and grammatically correct, this line:
"People are of different nature."
should read (as Grammarly notes) "People are of different natureS".
Beyond that, what is the point of this (linguistically repetitive and imageless) piece? Some people are able to make do with and be grateful for having/receiving little. So what? And shouldn't the title be "People worth emulating"?
"People are of different nature."
should read (as Grammarly notes) "People are of different natureS".
Beyond that, what is the point of this (linguistically repetitive and imageless) piece? Some people are able to make do with and be grateful for having/receiving little. So what? And shouldn't the title be "People worth emulating"?
0
Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
2nd Jun 2020 7:15pm
1- Don't you know, Baldwin, that nature is [U.C]?
2- The rest is a matter of opinion. Thanks.
2- The rest is a matter of opinion. Thanks.
Re: Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
2nd Jun 2020 9:51pm
So all those Church Fathers who claimed that Jesus had two different natures made a mistake?
0
Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
2nd Jun 2020 10:00pm
I said NATURE can be used as a COUNTABLE, and UNCOUNTABLE noun. Can you say anything else?
Re: Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
No, you didn't. You said, "Don't you know, Baldwin, that nature is [U.C]? ".
In any case, the issue is whether the line in "People Worth Living" is grammatically correct given what you intended to say -- i.e., that people have differing characters/dispositions/temperaments.
In any case, the issue is whether the line in "People Worth Living" is grammatically correct given what you intended to say -- i.e., that people have differing characters/dispositions/temperaments.
0
Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
I said NATURE can be used as a COUNTABLE, and UNCOUNTABLE noun. Can you say anything differently?
Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
Please don't be a philosopher, Badwin. It's more than enough to be a critic.
Re: Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
2nd Jun 2020 10:21pm
Did the Church Fathers say Jesus had two natures or not? Have you not also said so?
And who are you to tell me what I should be?
And who are you to tell me what I should be?
0
Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
Re: Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
2nd Jun 2020 10:32pm
Except you don't answer them. You keep avoiding them.
Where's your answer to my question about what the Church Farthers (and you) have said about how many natures Jesus had?
Where's your answer to my question about what the Church Farthers (and you) have said about how many natures Jesus had?
0
Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
You know my answer, so why should l waste my time? By the way, are your two top sentences correct? I hate to correct the people who suppose that they know English.
Re: Re. PEOPLE WORTH LIVING
2nd Jun 2020 11:09pm