ignore this... i'm half past drunk {&} you're confusing me just a little more than i should allow ~

That final stanza is such a soft landing for the buildup. Just lovely. xo

I do so miss this raw style when you are away😥 Brava, mon tres belle amie❣❣ I was touched most by this passage,
"it matters not that words disperse in anemone tendrils
ov curiosity "

i came to say that exact thing. so beautiful!!

hiiiiii, welcome to my side of the sandbox :) thank you so very much for reading me and leaving your thoughts 🖤

In cerebral moments of euphoria we allow the mind to wander where the body wishes to fly

"i clean my whoring wounds with disolving love letters"

Such bloody dark and brilliant, a line

bravo
J

Dear K,

Your entire piece is epic. Stanza {ii} is killer. I shouldn't be commenting yet as I don’t have all my thoughts fully formulated but...it’s an amazing piece. I love the pomegranate and pretzel association and then even the title of the work is stop the world interesting. As usual I truly admire your formatting. Captivating- the entire work.  H🌷

Doesn't matter who You spill for in this wonderful puddle
each reader can decide and / or envision thereof...................

Very nice poem.
... ...
I like the following verses:
" lick the crisis from my lips,
i have all my buttons pretzel'd ..."

What's with the apostrophes in "dissected" and "seeded"?

The Shakespearean era apostrophe is unnecessary nowadays, because we don't normally pronounce the e in regular past tense verbs now anyway. But in words like "dissected" and "seeded", it's impossible to miss out the e, because that would make the word unpronounceable.

dissectttttd...
seeddddddddddddd....

Know what I mean, mate?

you miss'd "gash'd" {&} "pretzel'd", mate
also miss'd the pourtunity to point out my use ov ov in lieu ov of  

it's just part ov my style, along with much punctuation abuse...
... 'part from me explaining my schtick to you, was there something constructive you were meaning to add to this[?]  
or were ya just here for light n mints [?]  
enquiring minds would like to know

I think it is indeed constructive to point out that "dissect'd" and "seed'd" are unpronounceable. You need the e there. There doesn't seem to be any reason for getting rid of it, other than to give the poem a mock-Tudor appearance.

"gash'd" and "pretzel'd" are OK, because they do not need an e. But between two d's, or a t and a d, there must be a vowel sound of some kind, just in order to make the word pronounceable.

I would accept "dissectoid". Or "seedood".

had i thought i needed a vowel there, i would have includ'd one...
... not for want ov recreating or making use ov any style as i (personally/mostly) shun the use ov set styles {&/or} rhyme schemes {the latter which i [again personally] find juvenile] but more power to all the dr. suess fans out there

this is how i write

not for a lack ov understanding proper grammar {&/or} punctuation but for the love ov both {&} bending them as i see fit.
this is not likely to change as i am happy with how i structure {&} stylize my poetry

if my style is not your cup ov sencha, that's just peachy with me {&} i appreciate the time you took to take umbrage with it {&} thank you for being irk'd enough to comment

Dr Seuss, Shakespeare, what's the difference, eh?

Both juvenile, with their silly rhyme schemes...

not a fan ov either