The Eton indoctrinated Queer Nicky Haslam who says Meghan Markle is frightfully common!

 
By Stanley Collymore
 
The only truly committed acts and with any real  
purpose that this all of his sick, twisted and  
loathsomely perverted life and still rather  
effusively embarked on by him with  
élan in his recurrently pathetic and demented  
octogenarian years by inured and serially  
compulsive and odious Queer Nicky  
Haslam, is the exuberant and keen  
ramming of his urgent penis up  
the clasped bums of hapless  
paedophile preys or other  
deviants as himself and  
relatedly having the  
same done to him!
 
Buggery in Britain that was previously outlawed for  
centuries until it was eventually decriminalized  
in 1963 and not until 2003 was legitimized  
in the United States; yet on numerous  
occasions and preceding to these dates in both  
countries this absolutely nauseating Queer,  
Nicky Haslam wasn’t just excessively  
but was also sneeringly breaking  
the law over here in Britain  
and also doing the same  
over there in the USA.
 
And the depraved and economically self-serving,  
sexual pimp that unquestionably he always  
was, and still is, Nicky Haslam, who  
has never done an honest day’s work in his sordidly  
pathetic existence, fervently made sure that the  
spurious endeavours he laughably engaged  
in as occupations were always financed  
by others, until these extraordinarily  
wealthy Queer dilettante friends
of his initially awe-struck by  
his infamous, class-based,  
Eton College background, got utterly
sick and tired of Nicky Haslam’s  
sponging off of them and both  
hurriedly and determinedly  
immediately got rid of  
and cut their former
dealings with him.  
 
All of them except Charles, Prince of Wales,  
with whom Nicky Haslam has had this  
enduring and unchanged personal  
relationship, even after Nicky  
Haslam’s idiotic, intemperate and venomous  
remarks about Charles’ own daughter-in-
law Meghan Markle. And stimulates  
the obvious and pertinent question  
with all solicitous, independent
and astutely thinking persons,  
would Prince Charles have  
been so likewise taciturn  
if comparable remarks  
by obnoxious Queer  
Nicky Haslam were similarly, or  
instead of Meghan, focussed  
specifically at his other  
markedly white and
UK, daughter-in-
law Catherine
Middleton?
 
© Stanley V. Collymore
16 March 2020.
 
 
Author’s Remarks:
It’s a known and seemingly to some an accepted fact of life that those whose personal lives are notoriously, even if clandestinely so, not worthy of any sort of commendable scrutiny are nevertheless invariably the very ones who are most apt to be scathingly critical of others whose lives: professional as well as private, are completely above any kind of reproach.
 
And this is no more so apparent than in the case of the odiously inured Queer and loathsome paedophile Nicky Haslam, who with appalling and breath-taking impunity granted to him on both sides of the Atlantic, namely in Britain and the United States, was allowed to routinely and illegally contravene the buggery laws of the United Kingdom as well as the USA, and quite ludicrously as a so-called socialite even applauded, by his upper-crust, class-infested and social climbing Queers and the newspaper rags and magazines that cater for them, for boasting about what he was doing.
 
And all this because of his perceived upper-crust and Eton College background, where apart from buying your supposed education, which in essence is basically non-existent, pupils there can be assured of a good grounding in Queerism!
 
Revelations by Nicky Haslam - omitting of course his deeply-ingrained paedophilia as there’s no statutory limitation on acts of paedophilia either in Britain or the USA and self-evidently this rather odious Queer wasn’t going to deliberately incriminate himself and risk spending time in jail, where he should have been anyway – that included his intense Queer-relationship with Anthony Armstrong Jones who would subsequently go on to marry Princess Margaret.
 
Sickening that! And there is no indication from Nicky Haslam whether Margaret knew of her prospective husband’s Queerism. But probably did as Nicky Haslam was and still is a close friend of the so-called British royal family. I use the adjective sickening since it was really Group Captain Peter Townsend that Margaret was passionately in love with but all efforts by her to marry him were blocked by the senior gang members of this mafia-type royal family because Peter Townsend was a divorced man. Nothing doing there love Margaret was effectively told but, of course, you are quite at liberty to marry this Welsh Queer Tony Armstrong Jones. Makes us look as if we're reforming and being modern!

And while you two are technically married to each other, in the interim have a couple of children; biologically so together or by virtue of consensual cuckolding. No one outside of us, our close circle of trusted friends, courtiers and other obsequious staffers (who're all bent as corkscrews themselves) would ever know, and as per usual under the deceitful guise of a "normal" marriage you'll both be free to licentiously carry on having your preferred and customary affairs with, as you wish, either or both men and women! Now many years later the son of Tony and Margaret is being divorced by his wife. Coincidence? Or perhaps the wheel spinning full circle! What uncivilized duplicity!
 
And this has been the abominable state of affairs throughout this sick, twisted and depraved family that rather delusionally thinks it’s in situ because of some divine affirmation. But why I’m even writing about Nicky Haslam is that he’s a particularly close friend of Charles, Prince of Wales, and what’s more has had the sheer audacity to describe Meghan Markle as “frightfully common” and even went as far as to loathsomely berate the wedding dress that she wore at her wedding. And did Charles intervene in any of this? Not one fucking bit! Any more than his mum or William; nor did any of the other members of this sick and utterly dysfunctional family come out in support of Meghan in the wake of all the racist, sexist and bullying castigation she has been unwarrantedly subjected to. And what on earth for? Being African-American and having the sheer audacity to reciprocally fall in love with Prince Harry.
 
Contrast all that with the measures put in place to safeguard Andrew and William whose particular sexual predilections are now widely known. And from my perspective prompts the obvious and pertinent question: Why isn’t Charles likewise under close and objective scrutiny about his Queer and paedophile friends? Jimmy Savile had the full run of Buckingham Palace and all the other royal palaces; visited Charles there on numerous occasions, and Charles even wanted him to be HARRY’S godfather but Diana, Harry’s mum, and who clearly was the only one among this royal lot from the queen downwards who among themselves fulsomely enthused about Jimmy Savile, and that included the palace courtiers and other staffers (most of whom are perverts themselves), thought Jimmy Savile was “creepy” and under no circumstance was Princess Diana going to allow Jimmy Savile to be Harry’s godparent. Thank God for your perspicacity Diana! Even so Jimmy Savile’s perverted and paedophile sexual exploits were not only known in palace and establishment circles but also widely welcomed among them.
 
Then there was Charles similar queer (as in the terminology odd) relationship with Peter Ball the paedophile C of E Bishop of Lewes and Gloucester that Charles had a relationship with for in excess of 21 years. As is this ongoing relationship of Charles with Nicky Haslam. And my response to this, and the cowardice that Charles, his mum, William and the rest of them have shown as regards Harry and Meghan, and even during Meghan’s pregnancy, says a lot about their own perversions and in the minds of all intelligent and objective people the commendable nature of both Meghan and Harry.
 
If any Black man or woman was cavorting with, and over a number of decades, with known drug pushers and traffickers that individual would be labelled as one of them. So how the hell then can Charles, his mum, Andrew, William and the rest of them cavort with people of questionable integrity as well as provable sexual criminality and are still regarded by a significant number of white Britons invoking ancient myths of Empire, as well as white obsequious lowlifes, masquerading as human beings, as the best thing since the invention of sliced bread?
 
My honest opinion to all of this Harry and Meghan is, that you’re well out of it!  And directly to Meghan I say this: If Harry wants to maintain contact with some or all of his family let him. But distance yourself from this toxic entity, and any invitations you get from any of them, which won’t be genuine but will be  acts of self-aggrandizing on their part to falsely portray themselves to a thoroughly dim-witted British public how magnanimous, but in reality utterly duplicitous, they actually are – for what I’d really like to know – tell the senders of these invitations: from the 93 year old nonagenarian mafia boss of this family to anyone else associated with them,  to rigorously stick their undesirable invitations firmly up where the sun doesn’t shine. And distinctly keep Archie away from them. Life’s too short to waste valuable time on people who can’t render any genuine help when it’s necessary and seriously needed; but instead fervently give their unstinting assistance to your worst and malicious enemies. So why bother with them!