EACH HAS HIS TRAITS.

Be content ... nice write indeed ...

Dear LF
Thank you very much for your kind comment.

I enjoyed the message of this, JZ. Sometimes we miss our own gifts and contributions due to wishing we had those of others.

As far as honest critique, the end stops were a bit too abrupt for me. I think some smoother transitions would allow it to flow with more ease.

what are "eyes of wish"?      
      
And are you saying that the snails should perceive/recognize birds with some other kind of eyes?    
 
Is it really the mucus that sails use to glide over flowers that "impels" flowers' "hate" (presumably of snails -- though your syntax leaves open what the object of its haste is) or is it the fact that snails eat the stems of flowers and leave holes in them?
   
More importantly,  why are you admonishing snails to not wish to be birds?  Have you some evidence that they desire to be birds and are  jealous their ability to fly, not to mention that this is aroused only when snails have climbed a rose tree and seen birds?  

Oh snail!
When you are mocked
for your slow pace
you need not be shell shocked.
Instead, remind your mockers of
old Aesop’s wisdom braced remark
that when it comes
to competition’s victories,
it’s “slow and steady wins the race”.
And when it comes
to shipments here and there,
its’ you, at ease,
who lets cargo.

Dear Ahavati,
Thank you very much for your kind comment. Please always send me your honest critiques because l appreciate your opinion.

Dear Baldwin,
Eyes of wish means wishing eyes.
About the other questions, l consider it is a waste of time to answer them. They are very clear to everybody. I have no time to waste.
Thank you for your comment.

But what are "wishing eyes"

And I wonder if you realize that given the syntax of your dodge   "About the other questions, l consider it is a waste of time to answer them. They are very clear to everybody" you are asserting that what's very clear to "everybody" are my questions!

Furthermore, that you consider answering my questions to be a waste of time  does not mean, let alone show,  that they are not legitimate, let alone that they should not be answered.

Besides that,  you seem to have sufficient time to give your opinion of them.  Too bad you didn't use that time to show that your opinion of them has a basis in fact.

Dear Baldwin,
Don't you feel that you talk too much, and sometimes your talk is MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING?

Are you saying that your submissions are essentially "nothing"?  And how does what I might feel have any bearing on whether or not what I say about your submissions are on the mark.

Come on,  JZ,  Stop finding ways to dodge my questions.

I am not finding ways to dodge your questions, but l don't like to talk much, and l have no time to do so.

I am not finding ways to dodge your questions, but l don't like to talk much, and l have no time to do so.

I am not finding ways to dodge your questions, but l don't like to talk much, and l have no time to do so.

But you DO have time to write up and send me a notice that you have no time to find ways to dodge my questions, which in itself is  testimony to the fact that you do have time to not dodge them.. Or are you saying that you have no time to not like talking too much?  Your syntax is confusing.

And whether or not you are not finding ways to dodge my questions,  you are doing so.