deepundergroundpoetry.com
Homosexuality is SELF taught
Let me start off with Pavlov's Dog.
Ivan Pavlov was a Russian physiologist at the end of the 1800s.
He rang a bell whenever he fed his dog.
He wanted to see if a NON stimulant (the sound of the bell)
could become a stimulant (something that aroused the dog).
Over time the dog associated the ringing with the food that he ate, why ??
Because the two things happened TOGETHER.
So the brain could LINK them - create bonding.
It worked: the dog salivated (which = arousal) when just the bell was rung.
On the basis of the results of Pavlov's dog experiments,
I can contend that a non-stimulant (the sight of the male organ),
can become a stimulant (cause sexual arousal)
if the person looking at the organ does it
at the same time that he is stimulating himself sexually.
Its Pavlov's dog all over again.
The timing is the key: the two things have to coincide,
happen together - at the same time.
That causes the mind to impute to the image (of the organ)
some of the identity of the stimulus, ie,
the sexual pleasure he is creating.
My point is this:
The brain marries the image of the organ to the pleasure,
such that a non-stimulant becomes a stimulant, OK ??
Just like the ringing of the bell went from a nonstimulant to a stimulant
just because it was linked by the brain to the original stimulant,
Namely, the pleasure the dog got by eating the food.
Makes sense to you ?? It does to me.
Ivan Pavlov was a Russian physiologist at the end of the 1800s.
He rang a bell whenever he fed his dog.
He wanted to see if a NON stimulant (the sound of the bell)
could become a stimulant (something that aroused the dog).
Over time the dog associated the ringing with the food that he ate, why ??
Because the two things happened TOGETHER.
So the brain could LINK them - create bonding.
It worked: the dog salivated (which = arousal) when just the bell was rung.
On the basis of the results of Pavlov's dog experiments,
I can contend that a non-stimulant (the sight of the male organ),
can become a stimulant (cause sexual arousal)
if the person looking at the organ does it
at the same time that he is stimulating himself sexually.
Its Pavlov's dog all over again.
The timing is the key: the two things have to coincide,
happen together - at the same time.
That causes the mind to impute to the image (of the organ)
some of the identity of the stimulus, ie,
the sexual pleasure he is creating.
My point is this:
The brain marries the image of the organ to the pleasure,
such that a non-stimulant becomes a stimulant, OK ??
Just like the ringing of the bell went from a nonstimulant to a stimulant
just because it was linked by the brain to the original stimulant,
Namely, the pleasure the dog got by eating the food.
Makes sense to you ?? It does to me.
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 0
reading list entries 0
comments 6
reads 381
Commenting Preference:
The author encourages honest critique.