deepundergroundpoetry.com
[ SK ] Negative Existence
Chomping down HARD
consuming Reality's fabric
Void of despair looming
left behind in their wake
Wildcard multiplied
coming straight for you
bent with singular purpose:
take, take, take
all Love and Happiness away
Leaving no Past or Future
that would ever be recognized
only the longest Today
you've been dreading
intent upon Dreamscape shredding
Seems as though
every fragment of Joy
is devoured in Creation's
antithesis
embedding doubts and fears
until becoming actualized
Blinded
in a private
polarized Aurora Borealis
DON'T
you
dare act surprised
DON'T
insult
your own intelligence
YOU and I
know
better than to live like this
Lie after lie
Positive Affirmation
over-written by
Negative Existence
Author's Note
inspired by Stephen King's "The Langoliers"
All writing remains the property of the author. Don't use it for any purpose without their permission.
likes 5
reading list entries 1
comments 5
reads 677
Commenting Preference:
The author encourages honest critique.
Re. Negative Existence
First, the tv adaptation! Anyone who loves Sci-fi and time-travel ( and who actually hasn't seen this yet ) should love this thriller! While it received mixed reviews, this novella-turned-TV movie was NOT a disappointment for me. In fact, it's one of my favorite King films. Where it lacked was special effects, and perhaps the length, somewhat.
As per many King films, the actors made up for the shortcomings ( although many reviews disagree ). Bronson Pinchot as the psychotic, paper-shredding "Craig Toomey" and Dean Stockwell as "Bob Jenkins" were exceptionally good. I thought they were the best characters and kept things interesting.
This causes you to wonder what it would be like if humans could time travel, and what exactly would happen to us . . .would our complete history be altered and thus our present change?
I would recommend it as a great sci-fi thriller, especially to anyone who is intrigued by time travel and alternate dimensions.
Now for the poem:
Negative Existence
[ Right off the bat your choice of title is intriguing. In a developmental sense ( and as a photographer ) the very word " negative " connotates imagery based on filtered experience, e.g. - underdeveloped . . .developing . . .twilight zone . . .the dark side . . . and so forth.
That you coupled it with "Existence" would indicate the darker side of what could be manipulated while becoming.]
Chomping down HARD
consuming straight through
Reality's fabric
[ Brilliant reference of Time consumption, as Time is an illusion of reality in the third dimension. I always look forward to how you weave your phonics through the verse between each line as thread, typically ending with a drawstring of half rhyme pulling it taut. However, in this one it's actually the assonance of a that carries it through, especially in straight / reality / fabric. ]
Void of despair looming
left behind in their wake
[ see how looming pulls the assonance of o through ( no pun intended ) , and wake the a and half rhyme of fabric from the previous stanza? This is one of your writing trademarks.]
Wildcard multiplied
coming straight for you
[ Again with the wake / multiplied half rhyme and you / looming assonance. ]
bent with singular purpose:
to take, take, take
[ purpose / you / looming assonance and take / multiplied / wake. I can do this all day! And have actually wanted to regarding your writing! ]
all Love and Happiness away
[ Love / purpose/ you / looming and away / take / multiplied / wake. Not to mention the delicious alliteration between all / and / away coupled with the assonance if a in general. ]
Leaving no Past or Future
that would ever be recognized
[ Here you shuffle a bit . . .Leaving picks up the alliteration of L in Love and assonance if i in happiness followed through with its half-rhyme, Past / that and recognized. ]
only the longest Today
you've been dreading
intent upon Dreamscape shredding
[ I can't separate this couplet from the impact of the ensuing line. The alliteration / consonance of d is divine on the tongue! Dreading / Dreamscape / shredding. Even the / longest and been are chiming with the assonance of e. ]
Seems as though
every fragment of Joy
is devoured in Creation's
antithesis
[ I adore the assonance of e carrying from intent to Seems throughout this stanza. Especially with Seems / Creations/ antithesis ( SUCH a great choice of words, btw - especially to end the stanza with. ) Though / Joy / devoured are also awesome assonance with those o's.
I particularly enjoyed the careful choice and placement of words to reiterate the purpose of meaning, i. e. - devoured in Creation's antithesis. ]
letting doubts and fears in
for the embedding
until becoming actualized
[ This is where I stumbled . . .especially the first line . . . there's something about the syntax that doesn't seem to flow as lyrically as the previous stanzas. Maybe it's because it ends with the preposition " in ".
I'm wondering if there's not a smoother way to rearrange the syntax? While I realize letting / embedding are harmonious, I almost want to lose letting . . .
embedding doubts and fears
until becoming actualized
To gauge the impact of this alteration I reviewed the previous and ensuing stanzas stanza ( as one is wanton to do when editing your work ). It works beautifully flowing into the next, and I honestly can't tell that big a difference in the transition from the previous.
Yes, you lose a bit of consonance in the t sound; however, not enough to compensate for the awkward flow leaving it as is.
Perhaps you have an alternate suggestion? ]
Blinded
in a bi-polar
private Aurora Borealis
[ While this stanza is divine in its B alliteration and i assonance ( not to mention imagery ), I'm wanton to switch private / bi-polar to read as such
Blinded
in a private
bi-polar Aurora Borealis
What do you think? ]
DON'T
you
dare act surprised
[ I Love how act pulls private in from the previous stanza, accentuating ' are '. . . very appropos! Brilliant, even! Chomp chomp! Also, there's something so freezing about the phrase " DON'T you date. . ." especially cascaded the way it is.
Borealis and surprised is also lovely consonance of the s. ]
DON'T
insult
your own intelligence
[ Ohhhhh that i alliteration coupled with the n consonance throughout the stanza is poetic music! Why not throw in some l consonance for shits & giggles?! ]
YOU and I
know
better than to live like this
[ Fabulous stanza! The long i in I / like - contrasted with the short i of live / this is phonics at its best! Then YOU toss in a couple of long o's and a short . . . mix it with a bit of l alliteration, and wallah! You have a melodious stanza! ]
Lie after lie
Positive Affirmation
over-written by
[ But Wait! Because you're reading today, there's more! The alliteration of L spilling into this stanza is perfect. The consonance of t from better falls beautifully into Positive and written here. ]
Negative Existence
[ Back to the beauty of your title selection. But more than that is the ominous message of a Negative Existence trumping Positive affirmation . . . or perhaps the lie reference infers a particular delusion or nonbelief in such affirmations to have little if any affect on such negativity.
Either way, it causes one to pause and think. . .
Excellent poem that's phonetically perfect except the few noted places I stumbled. Love your newly instilled fire and desire to get her done!
A poem is a terrible thing to waste! ]
The Langoliers. 💜
As per many King films, the actors made up for the shortcomings ( although many reviews disagree ). Bronson Pinchot as the psychotic, paper-shredding "Craig Toomey" and Dean Stockwell as "Bob Jenkins" were exceptionally good. I thought they were the best characters and kept things interesting.
This causes you to wonder what it would be like if humans could time travel, and what exactly would happen to us . . .would our complete history be altered and thus our present change?
I would recommend it as a great sci-fi thriller, especially to anyone who is intrigued by time travel and alternate dimensions.
Now for the poem:
Negative Existence
[ Right off the bat your choice of title is intriguing. In a developmental sense ( and as a photographer ) the very word " negative " connotates imagery based on filtered experience, e.g. - underdeveloped . . .developing . . .twilight zone . . .the dark side . . . and so forth.
That you coupled it with "Existence" would indicate the darker side of what could be manipulated while becoming.]
Chomping down HARD
consuming straight through
Reality's fabric
[ Brilliant reference of Time consumption, as Time is an illusion of reality in the third dimension. I always look forward to how you weave your phonics through the verse between each line as thread, typically ending with a drawstring of half rhyme pulling it taut. However, in this one it's actually the assonance of a that carries it through, especially in straight / reality / fabric. ]
Void of despair looming
left behind in their wake
[ see how looming pulls the assonance of o through ( no pun intended ) , and wake the a and half rhyme of fabric from the previous stanza? This is one of your writing trademarks.]
Wildcard multiplied
coming straight for you
[ Again with the wake / multiplied half rhyme and you / looming assonance. ]
bent with singular purpose:
to take, take, take
[ purpose / you / looming assonance and take / multiplied / wake. I can do this all day! And have actually wanted to regarding your writing! ]
all Love and Happiness away
[ Love / purpose/ you / looming and away / take / multiplied / wake. Not to mention the delicious alliteration between all / and / away coupled with the assonance if a in general. ]
Leaving no Past or Future
that would ever be recognized
[ Here you shuffle a bit . . .Leaving picks up the alliteration of L in Love and assonance if i in happiness followed through with its half-rhyme, Past / that and recognized. ]
only the longest Today
you've been dreading
intent upon Dreamscape shredding
[ I can't separate this couplet from the impact of the ensuing line. The alliteration / consonance of d is divine on the tongue! Dreading / Dreamscape / shredding. Even the / longest and been are chiming with the assonance of e. ]
Seems as though
every fragment of Joy
is devoured in Creation's
antithesis
[ I adore the assonance of e carrying from intent to Seems throughout this stanza. Especially with Seems / Creations/ antithesis ( SUCH a great choice of words, btw - especially to end the stanza with. ) Though / Joy / devoured are also awesome assonance with those o's.
I particularly enjoyed the careful choice and placement of words to reiterate the purpose of meaning, i. e. - devoured in Creation's antithesis. ]
letting doubts and fears in
for the embedding
until becoming actualized
[ This is where I stumbled . . .especially the first line . . . there's something about the syntax that doesn't seem to flow as lyrically as the previous stanzas. Maybe it's because it ends with the preposition " in ".
I'm wondering if there's not a smoother way to rearrange the syntax? While I realize letting / embedding are harmonious, I almost want to lose letting . . .
embedding doubts and fears
until becoming actualized
To gauge the impact of this alteration I reviewed the previous and ensuing stanzas stanza ( as one is wanton to do when editing your work ). It works beautifully flowing into the next, and I honestly can't tell that big a difference in the transition from the previous.
Yes, you lose a bit of consonance in the t sound; however, not enough to compensate for the awkward flow leaving it as is.
Perhaps you have an alternate suggestion? ]
Blinded
in a bi-polar
private Aurora Borealis
[ While this stanza is divine in its B alliteration and i assonance ( not to mention imagery ), I'm wanton to switch private / bi-polar to read as such
Blinded
in a private
bi-polar Aurora Borealis
What do you think? ]
DON'T
you
dare act surprised
[ I Love how act pulls private in from the previous stanza, accentuating ' are '. . . very appropos! Brilliant, even! Chomp chomp! Also, there's something so freezing about the phrase " DON'T you date. . ." especially cascaded the way it is.
Borealis and surprised is also lovely consonance of the s. ]
DON'T
insult
your own intelligence
[ Ohhhhh that i alliteration coupled with the n consonance throughout the stanza is poetic music! Why not throw in some l consonance for shits & giggles?! ]
YOU and I
know
better than to live like this
[ Fabulous stanza! The long i in I / like - contrasted with the short i of live / this is phonics at its best! Then YOU toss in a couple of long o's and a short . . . mix it with a bit of l alliteration, and wallah! You have a melodious stanza! ]
Lie after lie
Positive Affirmation
over-written by
[ But Wait! Because you're reading today, there's more! The alliteration of L spilling into this stanza is perfect. The consonance of t from better falls beautifully into Positive and written here. ]
Negative Existence
[ Back to the beauty of your title selection. But more than that is the ominous message of a Negative Existence trumping Positive affirmation . . . or perhaps the lie reference infers a particular delusion or nonbelief in such affirmations to have little if any affect on such negativity.
Either way, it causes one to pause and think. . .
Excellent poem that's phonetically perfect except the few noted places I stumbled. Love your newly instilled fire and desire to get her done!
A poem is a terrible thing to waste! ]
The Langoliers. 💜
1
Re: Re. Negative Existence
I LOVE all the Stephen King mini-series(es).
It would be nice if George Lucas had channeled into energies into redoing the special effects of movies other than Star Wars. [nonsense]
"Blinded
in a bi-polar
private Aurora Borealis
[ While this stanza is divine in its B alliteration and i assonance ( not to mention imagery ), I'm wanton to switch private / bi-polar to read as such
Blinded
in a private
bi-polar Aurora Borealis"
OMG I originally had it that way!!!!!!!! I switched it at the last moment. I was thinking more along the lines of trimming a syllable from the Borealis line.
I'm wondering though now ....... if this would also work while adding to the rhyme scheme:
"Blinded
in a private
polarized Aurora Borealis" ?????
"letting doubts and fears in
for the embedding
until becoming actualized
[ This is where I stumbled . . .especially the first line . . . there's something about the syntax that doesn't seem to flow as lyrically as the previous stanzas. Maybe it's because it ends with the preposition " in ".
I'm wondering if there's not a smoother way to rearrange the syntax? While I realize letting / embedding are harmonious, I almost want to lose letting . . .
embedding doubts and fears
until becoming actualized
To gauge the impact of this alteration I reviewed the previous and ensuing stanzas stanza ( as one is wanton to do when editing your work ). It works beautifully flowing into the next, and I honestly can't tell that big a difference in the transition from the previous.
Yes, you lose a bit of consonance in the t sound; however, not enough to compensate for the awkward flow leaving it as is.
Perhaps you have an alternate suggestion? ]"
As is, it is an awkward stanza that bothered me as well. What you suggested is PERFECT!
Your grasp of assonance, consonance and alliteration blows my fricken mind. What I focus on is rhyming and timing to what is often a morphing musicality going on in my head. These things seem fall into place for me through mostly blind luck.
As always, your critique is on the money, Honey! 💜
Doing the revision now.
It would be nice if George Lucas had channeled into energies into redoing the special effects of movies other than Star Wars. [nonsense]
"Blinded
in a bi-polar
private Aurora Borealis
[ While this stanza is divine in its B alliteration and i assonance ( not to mention imagery ), I'm wanton to switch private / bi-polar to read as such
Blinded
in a private
bi-polar Aurora Borealis"
OMG I originally had it that way!!!!!!!! I switched it at the last moment. I was thinking more along the lines of trimming a syllable from the Borealis line.
I'm wondering though now ....... if this would also work while adding to the rhyme scheme:
"Blinded
in a private
polarized Aurora Borealis" ?????
"letting doubts and fears in
for the embedding
until becoming actualized
[ This is where I stumbled . . .especially the first line . . . there's something about the syntax that doesn't seem to flow as lyrically as the previous stanzas. Maybe it's because it ends with the preposition " in ".
I'm wondering if there's not a smoother way to rearrange the syntax? While I realize letting / embedding are harmonious, I almost want to lose letting . . .
embedding doubts and fears
until becoming actualized
To gauge the impact of this alteration I reviewed the previous and ensuing stanzas stanza ( as one is wanton to do when editing your work ). It works beautifully flowing into the next, and I honestly can't tell that big a difference in the transition from the previous.
Yes, you lose a bit of consonance in the t sound; however, not enough to compensate for the awkward flow leaving it as is.
Perhaps you have an alternate suggestion? ]"
As is, it is an awkward stanza that bothered me as well. What you suggested is PERFECT!
Your grasp of assonance, consonance and alliteration blows my fricken mind. What I focus on is rhyming and timing to what is often a morphing musicality going on in my head. These things seem fall into place for me through mostly blind luck.
As always, your critique is on the money, Honey! 💜
Doing the revision now.
Re: Re. Negative Existence
" It would be nice if George Lucas had channeled into energies into redoing the special effects of movies other than Star Wars. [nonsense] "
OMG! No truer words . . . ( Well, about the King series, anyway! )
[NONSENSE] )
" I'm wondering though now ....... if this would also work while adding to the rhyme scheme: 'Blinded in a private polarized Aurora Borealis ' ????? "
YES! YES! YES!!! ( the lady at the next table just ordered what I was having! [NONSENSICAL] )
" Your grasp of assonance, consonance and alliteration blows my fricken mind. What I focus on is rhyming and timing to what is often a morphing musicality going on in my head. These things seem fall into place for me through mostly blind luck. "
Some also have a natural propensity for rhythmic sounds - you might consciously be paying attention to the musical beat; however, subconsciously I'm sure you're sounding out as well.
Then again, Solomon once said, "Two are better than one; because they have a good reward for their labour. "
[/Flips hair nonsensically] !
" As always, your critique is on the money, Honey! 💜 "
I typically say, "If you got the money Honey, I got the time!" But in YOUR case, it's absolutely FREE ( as long as you halp me wis mah labor )! 💜
[NONSENSE]
OMG! No truer words . . . ( Well, about the King series, anyway! )
[NONSENSE] )
" I'm wondering though now ....... if this would also work while adding to the rhyme scheme: 'Blinded in a private polarized Aurora Borealis ' ????? "
YES! YES! YES!!! ( the lady at the next table just ordered what I was having! [NONSENSICAL] )
" Your grasp of assonance, consonance and alliteration blows my fricken mind. What I focus on is rhyming and timing to what is often a morphing musicality going on in my head. These things seem fall into place for me through mostly blind luck. "
Some also have a natural propensity for rhythmic sounds - you might consciously be paying attention to the musical beat; however, subconsciously I'm sure you're sounding out as well.
Then again, Solomon once said, "Two are better than one; because they have a good reward for their labour. "
[/Flips hair nonsensically] !
" As always, your critique is on the money, Honey! 💜 "
I typically say, "If you got the money Honey, I got the time!" But in YOUR case, it's absolutely FREE ( as long as you halp me wis mah labor )! 💜
[NONSENSE]
1
Re. Negative Existence
19th Sep 2017 2:25pm
Re: Re. Negative Existence
19th Sep 2017 3:08pm
It all is necessary and very enjoyable if you can put aside your doubts and fears long enough to reap the rewards. Thanks for reading.