Fun piece 1. Polygamous Sestina

Pedro rejoiced in his heterogenous taste.
Five women in a week with two days for philosophy.
If each offered a different way to be raunchy
They could revitalise his faltering lust.
With time in the clouds, what a sublime variety
Never to be found in the prison of monogamous love.
 
Phoebe was his Venus- a virginal aesthetic love.
Her body's beauty showed him to be a man of taste.
But she craved admiration without variety.
Eroticism strangled by her Calvinist philosophy
With resignation, she tolerated contemptible male lust.
Pedro could only hope for a next day rather more raunchy.
 
Pam was the very opposite- thrilling and raunchy.
Back and front, up and down, adventure was her love.
Competitive and a winner in the game of lust,
Humiliate through sex was her philosophy.
Such intimidation was hardly to Pedro's taste-
To admit defeat by Pam's matchless variety.
 
For Pilar impregnation required no variety.
Conception's purity could never be raunchy.
Sex for its own sake evaded her philosophy.
Only pregnancy and parenthood demanded love.
Sperm banks were a utility not a personal taste
With closed eyes she dreamt of babies when faced with male lust.
 
Patsy wanted all except the full works- her lust
Was for full body oral- that was enough variety.
She accepted only what met her limited taste.
Her men had to discover quickly what got her raunchy
And few were skilful enough to win her love.
A closed vaginal door remained her philosophy.
 
Pleasing others was Pauline's philosophy.
Hours of practising fake orgasms hid her lack of natural lust.
A sign of pleasure in the other's face was her greatest love.
Sex manuals were her prime source of variety
Only eight vodkas could get her to act up raunchy.
Adoring passivity by then was just to Pedro's taste.
 
So Pedro's free love philosophy gave him a perverse variety
Which denied his lust since few of the women were truly raunchy.
He rejected love but had to make each happy in her own taste.