DU Supporters
Yearly payment I like also. Think it's the easiest . Maybe just for those that want the perks, because not everyone is interested . Gives those the push to pay lol. But I like the way things are . Should have the option of just a star by the name or even nothing for paying.
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
Count me in.
I would prefer the yearly option. I, for one, have been known to miss a monthly but a yearly, especially with a reminder, I am certain to remember it.
PayPal works for me. (If you don't have a PayPal account, you can pay using a credit card via PayPal without setting up a PayPal account.)
And I don't need a special icon, color or anything else. Frankly, I would rather not know who does and who doesn't. Treat everyone the same, pay or not. No segregated society here or "levels" or whatever. I suspect there are more than 20 of us who will kick in with no need for notoriety. I suppose that would make it a sort of donation approach rather than a membership approach.
A special note to our Dear Mistress --you are certainly welcome to make a bit of cash for the work you do. (I've been where you are with a website, and I know how it can grow to the point of taking over your life.)
Comments aside, let me make this clear, I am in. Regardless of how, how much, or whatever.
Lastly, if it's a $100 a year, I would consider it a bargain.
(Might be, I could sponsor a couple of other members, to help them out, until they could do it on their on. I would consider it an honor.)
Jay
I would prefer the yearly option. I, for one, have been known to miss a monthly but a yearly, especially with a reminder, I am certain to remember it.
PayPal works for me. (If you don't have a PayPal account, you can pay using a credit card via PayPal without setting up a PayPal account.)
And I don't need a special icon, color or anything else. Frankly, I would rather not know who does and who doesn't. Treat everyone the same, pay or not. No segregated society here or "levels" or whatever. I suspect there are more than 20 of us who will kick in with no need for notoriety. I suppose that would make it a sort of donation approach rather than a membership approach.
A special note to our Dear Mistress --you are certainly welcome to make a bit of cash for the work you do. (I've been where you are with a website, and I know how it can grow to the point of taking over your life.)
Comments aside, let me make this clear, I am in. Regardless of how, how much, or whatever.
Lastly, if it's a $100 a year, I would consider it a bargain.
(Might be, I could sponsor a couple of other members, to help them out, until they could do it on their on. I would consider it an honor.)
Jay
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
No I don't think it's an issue that people like the added bonuses! I'm just simple and don't care for change much. But I don't hate those that don't mind it. I'm sure I'd get used to it. I only said what I said because its how I feel on the bonuses. Is all
I was thinking about this and what JJJay and Gg said is one of the things that I thought about too. Seem's as if contributor's we're to get special title's and added bonuses, soon this would become a segregated society. Not all, but some might start to think that they're entitled to more being contributor's and all and just might start develop a sense of ego causing them to berate those who can't afford to contribute. I want to be a part in contributing to the continued existence of this site, not for title's or extra priviledges, but because I know how much it mean's to a lot of people. It's a place for the young and old to come and express ourselves, to come and 'hang-out', and just may keep a lot of people out of trouble who might be out doing other things if this site didn't exist. So it's not a matter of paying to get extra for me. It's a matter of wanting to support a good cause.
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
