Viddax, this is something that would do well to be addressed in the behavioral guidelines for the members here or in a code of conduct for the moderators elsewhere. Or both.
attack the character or damage the reputation of other users, name-call, insult, ridicule, mock, electronically stalk ( on or off-site ) or otherwise harass another user; use any member's name in a poem without their specific consent.
One way to attack the character or damage the reputation of other DUP members is to falsely report another member's poem as an attack to the Mods.
Not a blatant attack, the likes of which MadameLavender recently endured - but veiled, as in the poem does not mention any names or point to any specific individual, but can be interpreted as an attack out of innnumerable interpretations that can be made.
This has happened on three occasions to me with nothing taken into consideration other than the accuser's words saying, "These poem(s) are about me and I want them removed."
One of these occasions involved the Webmiss herself removing one of my poems that supposedly mocked a physically disabled member of DUP. Then for an entire year, the physically disabled member posted in numerous poems and forum posts that he was being harrassed for being "legless". As much as I argued my case, Webmiss took the word of "the person who reported the poem" over mine. The poem didn't even mention legs; instead, it mentioned arms and was metaphorical as well! The same poem has since been reposted and allowed to stay.
In late 2019, an account belonging to a member of Team Podcast began Private Messaging members berating them for supporting another poem I had written a full year later that supposedly attacked a person associated with the Podcast. According to the unsubstantiated accusation, this poem mocked a person who was physically disabled. Gee. What an astounding mind blowing coincidence.
I did not report the blatantly false accusation Private Messaged to me and another person that I am aware of, but instead brought it to the attention of Moderator Lepperochan so he could be informed as to who on the Podcast Team was spreading the vicious rumors. What he ever did with the information I sent to him in a ginormous private message, I can't say. I didn't expect him to do anything. I just wanted him informed. It was at a time when Lepp expressed an interest in mending supposed rifts around DUP.
Bottom line is, there needs to be more taken into consideration than just the accuser's word, while applying this to the membership behavior guidelines, it would read something like:
Thou shalt not harrass other DUP members by filing false reports about their poems to the Moderators.
Or some shit like that.