The Politics Place
runaway-mindtrain said:Relay to the leftist you are debating that Fox and Dominion are both owned by Blackrock. Thus it is a conglomerate "acting" like, its suing itself. All showboat theatre by the establishment. "Fox is controlled opposition to leftist media". Which, in the real world, means a false dichotomy to push an agenda. Only a fucking idiot thinks that main stream media, that has decades long, well known, documented development to enslave minds is about spreading facts rather than narrative...
That's called "Project Mockingbird"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
Don't think for a moment, that it ended and isn't currently in use, today....
That's called "Project Mockingbird"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
Don't think for a moment, that it ended and isn't currently in use, today....
MadameLavender said:
That's called "Project Mockingbird"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
Don't think for a moment, that it ended and isn't currently in use, today....
Interesting that even leftist Wikipedia allows the truth of establishment media manipulation while manipulating information for the establishment... Dramatic irony. The Bard would have love it...
That's called "Project Mockingbird"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
Don't think for a moment, that it ended and isn't currently in use, today....
Interesting that even leftist Wikipedia allows the truth of establishment media manipulation while manipulating information for the establishment... Dramatic irony. The Bard would have love it...
Carpe_Noctem said:
Lmao what an intellectually retarded comment.
Democracy is an illusion. If you haven't figured out now the politicians don't serve the public, but rather their own interests. There is no helping you.
Exactly right Carpe ...
Good thing America is a Constitutional Republic and NOT mob rule Democracy. Leftist love to twist words and rewrite history to try to convince people we are a democracy. Especially foreign wankers that pretend their opinions mean jack shit to U.S. citizens....
Lmao what an intellectually retarded comment.
Democracy is an illusion. If you haven't figured out now the politicians don't serve the public, but rather their own interests. There is no helping you.
Exactly right Carpe ...
Good thing America is a Constitutional Republic and NOT mob rule Democracy. Leftist love to twist words and rewrite history to try to convince people we are a democracy. Especially foreign wankers that pretend their opinions mean jack shit to U.S. citizens....
runaway-mindtrain said:
Exactly right Carpe ...
Good thing America is a Constitutional Republic and NOT mob rule Democracy. Leftist love to twist words and rewrite history to try to convince people we are a democracy. Especially foreign wankers that pretend their opinions mean jack shit to U.S. citizens....
And this is a shining example of a typical patriotic Republican right wing extremist's intolerance and zealotry.
Here, you could not even write a sentence without attacking the people who hold a different view than yours. The sign of an adult, mature person is they can differentiate between attacking an view and attacking the holder of the views. Your every single contribution to the entire thread is an example of intolerance and childish and extremist reaction to anyone who disagrees with you.
I challenge you to hold a discussion or complete a reply without getting personal to anyone.
Exactly right Carpe ...
Good thing America is a Constitutional Republic and NOT mob rule Democracy. Leftist love to twist words and rewrite history to try to convince people we are a democracy. Especially foreign wankers that pretend their opinions mean jack shit to U.S. citizens....
And this is a shining example of a typical patriotic Republican right wing extremist's intolerance and zealotry.
Here, you could not even write a sentence without attacking the people who hold a different view than yours. The sign of an adult, mature person is they can differentiate between attacking an view and attacking the holder of the views. Your every single contribution to the entire thread is an example of intolerance and childish and extremist reaction to anyone who disagrees with you.
I challenge you to hold a discussion or complete a reply without getting personal to anyone.
Note to Mods - this thread and the leniency showed to the attacks on people participating in it reeks of bias, either deprioritize this thread or take action against individuals who simply cannot respect others and their differences of opinions and their rights to express the same.
This dude's extremist behaviour has been tolerated for far too long. Just because people are ignoring his behaviour doesn't mean it is not affecting those visiting the site
This dude's extremist behaviour has been tolerated for far too long. Just because people are ignoring his behaviour doesn't mean it is not affecting those visiting the site
cold_fusion said:Note to Mods - this thread and the leniency showed to the attacks on people participating in it reeks of bias, either deprioritize this thread or take action against individuals who simply cannot respect others and their differences of opinions and their rights to express the same.
This dude's extremist behaviour has been tolerated for far too long. Just because people are ignoring his behaviour doesn't mean it is not affecting those visiting the site
Probably not wise to be throwing ultimatums around. you don't have to either read or participate in the thread. if it offends you don't click into it
This dude's extremist behaviour has been tolerated for far too long. Just because people are ignoring his behaviour doesn't mean it is not affecting those visiting the site
Probably not wise to be throwing ultimatums around. you don't have to either read or participate in the thread. if it offends you don't click into it
lepperochan said:
Probably not wise to be throwing ultimatums around. you don't have to either read or participate in the thread. if it offends you don't click into it
Exactly
Maybe he considers
Runaway Mindtrain a threat to DU, like he claimed I was when I created the Pfizer documents thread.
Same logic applies there . Yet guy felt the urge to chime in
Probably not wise to be throwing ultimatums around. you don't have to either read or participate in the thread. if it offends you don't click into it
Exactly
Maybe he considers
Runaway Mindtrain a threat to DU, like he claimed I was when I created the Pfizer documents thread.
Same logic applies there . Yet guy felt the urge to chime in
lepperochan said:
Probably not wise to be throwing ultimatums around. you don't have to either read or participate in the thread. if it offends you don't click into it
Well if that's the case, why did you deprioritize MY TWO threads after runaway_mindtrain and Carpe chimed in?! Could it be because you agree with them and not with me? Even though I never attacked ANYONE with ANY of my posts?!
No. It's blatant bias.
Probably not wise to be throwing ultimatums around. you don't have to either read or participate in the thread. if it offends you don't click into it
Well if that's the case, why did you deprioritize MY TWO threads after runaway_mindtrain and Carpe chimed in?! Could it be because you agree with them and not with me? Even though I never attacked ANYONE with ANY of my posts?!
No. It's blatant bias.
Ahavati said:
Well if that's the case, why did you deprioritize MY TWO threads after runaway_mindtrain and Carpe chimed in?! Could it be because you agree with them and not with me? Even though I never attacked ANYONE with ANY of my posts?!
I don't know about your two threads, I know that on this particular thread there were no posts reported for abuse. that's because for the most part they insult each other
so if third party takes offence is not really a moderator problem. It is the third parties problem
Well if that's the case, why did you deprioritize MY TWO threads after runaway_mindtrain and Carpe chimed in?! Could it be because you agree with them and not with me? Even though I never attacked ANYONE with ANY of my posts?!
I don't know about your two threads, I know that on this particular thread there were no posts reported for abuse. that's because for the most part they insult each other
so if third party takes offence is not really a moderator problem. It is the third parties problem
lepperochan said:
I don't know about your two threads, I know that on this particular thread there were no posts reported for abuse. that's because for the most part they insult each other
so if third party takes offence is not really a moderator problem. It is the third parties problem
Really? Because Madame hasn't been online, Cabcool said he saw absolutely NO REASON for moderator intervention, Grace isn't a moderator anymore, and Viddax is never online and hadn't been when my thread was deprioritized.
That leaves YOU.
So you're saying that a thread gets deprioritized because of reports of abuse? So instead of addressing the abusive poster moderators deprioritize a factual thread? Twice now?
I don't know about your two threads, I know that on this particular thread there were no posts reported for abuse. that's because for the most part they insult each other
so if third party takes offence is not really a moderator problem. It is the third parties problem
Really? Because Madame hasn't been online, Cabcool said he saw absolutely NO REASON for moderator intervention, Grace isn't a moderator anymore, and Viddax is never online and hadn't been when my thread was deprioritized.
That leaves YOU.
So you're saying that a thread gets deprioritized because of reports of abuse? So instead of addressing the abusive poster moderators deprioritize a factual thread? Twice now?
Really? Because Madame hasn't been online,
she has.
Cabcool said he saw absolutely NO REASON for moderator intervention,
When did he say that ?
Grace isn't a moderator anymore,
since about a week
and Viddax is never online and hadn't been when my thread was deprioritized.
So, when was your thread de-prioritized and why didn't you address it at time.
That leaves YOU.
"So you're saying that a thread gets deprioritized because of reports of abuse? So instead of addressing the abusive poster moderators deprioritize a factual thread? Twice now?"
again, I don't know about your two threads. And I never gave the criteria for de-prioritized thread.
she has.
Cabcool said he saw absolutely NO REASON for moderator intervention,
When did he say that ?
Grace isn't a moderator anymore,
since about a week
and Viddax is never online and hadn't been when my thread was deprioritized.
So, when was your thread de-prioritized and why didn't you address it at time.
That leaves YOU.
"So you're saying that a thread gets deprioritized because of reports of abuse? So instead of addressing the abusive poster moderators deprioritize a factual thread? Twice now?"
again, I don't know about your two threads. And I never gave the criteria for de-prioritized thread.
lepperochan said:Really? Because Madame hasn't been online,
she has.
The FIRST thing I checked was when each moderator had been online. She hadn't been online in 18 hours.
Cabcool said he saw absolutely NO REASON for moderator intervention,
When did he say that ?
Ask him yourself.
Grace isn't a moderator anymore,
since about a week
Like I said.
and Viddax is never online and hadn't been when my thread was deprioritized.
So, when was your thread de-prioritized and why didn't you address it at time.
I did and AM NOW, publicly.
That leaves YOU.
"So you're saying that a thread gets deprioritized because of reports of abuse? So instead of addressing the abusive poster moderators deprioritize a factual thread? Twice now?"
again, I don't know about your two threads. And I never gave the criteria for de-prioritized thread.
Well, there's a little moderator tool that reveals every action each person on this site takes. Including the moderators. And since YOU know nothing about this, and yet had been the only moderator online when it happened, perhaps YOU could fix the issue, because apparently Rew was right in that the site has been hacked.
Do you need the link to the thread to remove the adult content warning and deprioritization?
Here it is: https://deepundergroundpoetry.com/forum/speakeasy/read/12585/
she has.
The FIRST thing I checked was when each moderator had been online. She hadn't been online in 18 hours.
Cabcool said he saw absolutely NO REASON for moderator intervention,
When did he say that ?
Ask him yourself.
Grace isn't a moderator anymore,
since about a week
Like I said.
and Viddax is never online and hadn't been when my thread was deprioritized.
So, when was your thread de-prioritized and why didn't you address it at time.
I did and AM NOW, publicly.
That leaves YOU.
"So you're saying that a thread gets deprioritized because of reports of abuse? So instead of addressing the abusive poster moderators deprioritize a factual thread? Twice now?"
again, I don't know about your two threads. And I never gave the criteria for de-prioritized thread.
Well, there's a little moderator tool that reveals every action each person on this site takes. Including the moderators. And since YOU know nothing about this, and yet had been the only moderator online when it happened, perhaps YOU could fix the issue, because apparently Rew was right in that the site has been hacked.
Do you need the link to the thread to remove the adult content warning and deprioritization?
Here it is: https://deepundergroundpoetry.com/forum/speakeasy/read/12585/
Ahavati said:
Well, there's a little moderator tool that reveals every action each person on this site takes. Including the moderators. And since YOU know nothing about this, and yet had been the only moderator online when it happened, perhaps YOU could fix the issue, because apparently Rew was right in that the site has been hacked.
Do you need the link to the thread to remove the adult content warning and deprioritization?
send me the link, I'll check to see if a moderator de-prioritized it. if it was a moderator I'll leave it as is. if it's some kind of glitch I'll free it up
Well, there's a little moderator tool that reveals every action each person on this site takes. Including the moderators. And since YOU know nothing about this, and yet had been the only moderator online when it happened, perhaps YOU could fix the issue, because apparently Rew was right in that the site has been hacked.
Do you need the link to the thread to remove the adult content warning and deprioritization?
send me the link, I'll check to see if a moderator de-prioritized it. if it was a moderator I'll leave it as is. if it's some kind of glitch I'll free it up
