Is the World Safe for Conversation Anymore?
SatInUGal said:
How is this not hate speech and why is it allowed here?
The term "hate speech" was created by leftist to silence their enemies through fake victimhood projection. Hateful speech is free speech. Ever heard of the first amendment? In America, it is a standard that allows thought to happen without authoritarians closing off information that hurts their argument. Terroristic threats of personal violence are illegal. The sad part is watching brainwashed individuals attempt to use the "hate speech" argument to attack someone they don't like, all the while having a false moral superiority rationale for stopping free speech.
How is this not hate speech and why is it allowed here?
The term "hate speech" was created by leftist to silence their enemies through fake victimhood projection. Hateful speech is free speech. Ever heard of the first amendment? In America, it is a standard that allows thought to happen without authoritarians closing off information that hurts their argument. Terroristic threats of personal violence are illegal. The sad part is watching brainwashed individuals attempt to use the "hate speech" argument to attack someone they don't like, all the while having a false moral superiority rationale for stopping free speech.
EdibleWords said:
The farm protests are manufactured and enhanced by the globalists and Greta accidentally exposed the whole operation.
https://nypost.com/2021/02/04/greta-thunberg-faces-probe-in-india-over-farm-protest-tweets/
First of
Do you think power brokers are happy with India right now? Wouldn’t they like to destabilize their enemies to the global advancements of their powers?
Can you please elaborate how they are manufactured? And please...do not side step the matter,when I clearly pointed to you that the newssource and the article you've provided here we're wrong to claim Greta Thunberg faces probe. And please explain why are they manufactured? where's the proof other than some speculative right wing tabloid article posing as fact?
The farm protests are manufactured and enhanced by the globalists and Greta accidentally exposed the whole operation.
https://nypost.com/2021/02/04/greta-thunberg-faces-probe-in-india-over-farm-protest-tweets/
First of
Do you think power brokers are happy with India right now? Wouldn’t they like to destabilize their enemies to the global advancements of their powers?
Can you please elaborate how they are manufactured? And please...do not side step the matter,when I clearly pointed to you that the newssource and the article you've provided here we're wrong to claim Greta Thunberg faces probe. And please explain why are they manufactured? where's the proof other than some speculative right wing tabloid article posing as fact?

You said something you held back for you the danger accidentally triggering passionate activists and when I replied you totally bundled that backwards? Is this an adult conversation or a domestic spousal verbal spat?
Freedom comes with responsibility. I advise a little dwelling on the word responsibility. Not just the word freedom.
cold_fusion said:
Can you please elaborate how they are manufactured? And please...do not side step the matter,when I clearly pointed to you that the newssource and the article you've provided here we're wrong to claim Greta Thunberg faces probe. And please explain why are they manufactured? where's the proof other than some speculative right wing tabloid article posing as fact?
Re the Greta topic - The news article did not make that claim, did it? It made the claim that the probe was sparked by her.
As to the question of manufacturing protests - The thing she posted was a playbook, including when to post and how to get pictures of protesting - how to generate drama. It sounded pretty staged. Not to say every protestor was fake. I don’t know that.
But I’ve seen staged news before which includes actors, so one wonders how deep the rabbit hole goes.
Can you please elaborate how they are manufactured? And please...do not side step the matter,when I clearly pointed to you that the newssource and the article you've provided here we're wrong to claim Greta Thunberg faces probe. And please explain why are they manufactured? where's the proof other than some speculative right wing tabloid article posing as fact?
Re the Greta topic - The news article did not make that claim, did it? It made the claim that the probe was sparked by her.
As to the question of manufacturing protests - The thing she posted was a playbook, including when to post and how to get pictures of protesting - how to generate drama. It sounded pretty staged. Not to say every protestor was fake. I don’t know that.
But I’ve seen staged news before which includes actors, so one wonders how deep the rabbit hole goes.
cold_fusion said:You said something you held back for you the danger accidentally triggering passionate activists and when I replied you totally bundled that backwards? Is this an adult conversation or a domestic spousal verbal spat?
Backwards? You mean like pointing out that the person speaking is not the person acting? If I disputed the history of Muhammad (not at issue today) would that make me culpable for the actions of my murderer if a jihadist took revenge on me for my words?
If Trump uses normal political rhetoric and someone sees a chance to blame him for their foolish decision to take matters into their own hands against his advice, is that his fault, or theirs?
Freedom comes with responsibility. I advise a little dwelling on the word responsibility. Not just the word freedom.
I totally agree.
It’s not Trump’s responsibility when people contradict his advice for peace and lawfulness when they make their voices heard. That’s their responsibility to take.
Just like the girl in the miniskirt only has to say no, not wear a giant bag, too.
Backwards? You mean like pointing out that the person speaking is not the person acting? If I disputed the history of Muhammad (not at issue today) would that make me culpable for the actions of my murderer if a jihadist took revenge on me for my words?
If Trump uses normal political rhetoric and someone sees a chance to blame him for their foolish decision to take matters into their own hands against his advice, is that his fault, or theirs?
Freedom comes with responsibility. I advise a little dwelling on the word responsibility. Not just the word freedom.
I totally agree.
It’s not Trump’s responsibility when people contradict his advice for peace and lawfulness when they make their voices heard. That’s their responsibility to take.
Just like the girl in the miniskirt only has to say no, not wear a giant bag, too.
runaway-mindtrain said:https://youtu.be/UyZrD-dZnpo
Biden defends chinese internment camps..leftist on DUP now defend it below....
So an opinionated commentary, dear poet , you're quoting as undeniable fact?
And as soon as anyone points to ANY YouTube clip as undisputable fact, the credibility of the authenticity of the 'claim' is on shaky grounds.
Any child can upload anything on social media and that includes their opinions and doctored media. It speaks more of the gullibility of the believer than of their objectivity.
Biden defends chinese internment camps..leftist on DUP now defend it below....
So an opinionated commentary, dear poet , you're quoting as undeniable fact?
And as soon as anyone points to ANY YouTube clip as undisputable fact, the credibility of the authenticity of the 'claim' is on shaky grounds.
Any child can upload anything on social media and that includes their opinions and doctored media. It speaks more of the gullibility of the believer than of their objectivity.

Well... we're discussing our opinions and exchanging views here aren't we? I have zero interest in your ex-president and his politics. Am enjoying the exchange with you of the stuff that is universal and relates to all civilised human existence.
The thing is, as Thoreau's said
"I takes two to speak the truth-one to speak and another to hear."
it's pointless to have a true conversation if one of the 'two' ain't listening.
We are on same page re fascism and universal right to freedom of speech.
Just wanted to clarify what aspects of fascism you dislike the most? Can you and I be termed as anti-fascists?
cold_fusion said:Well... we're discussing our opinions and exchanging views here aren't we? I have zero interest in your ex-president and his politics. Am enjoying the exchange with you of the stuff that is universal and relates to all civilised human existence.
The thing is, as Thoreau's said
"I takes two to speak the truth-one to speak and another to hear."
it's pointless to have a true conversation if one of the 'two' ain't listening.
We are on same page re fascism and universal right to freedom of speech.
Just wanted to clarify what aspects of fascism you dislike the most? Can you and I be termed as anti-fascists?
Sure! As a much as we can both honestly say that Black Lives Matter. Even if we don’t like the leadership of a group.
The thing is, as Thoreau's said
"I takes two to speak the truth-one to speak and another to hear."
it's pointless to have a true conversation if one of the 'two' ain't listening.
We are on same page re fascism and universal right to freedom of speech.
Just wanted to clarify what aspects of fascism you dislike the most? Can you and I be termed as anti-fascists?
Sure! As a much as we can both honestly say that Black Lives Matter. Even if we don’t like the leadership of a group.