And were his *friends* the same kind of underage
idiots , and shit stirrers as he was , or were they
Why did they have to call him ?
Did they get themselves in trouble , or just desire to
stir up trouble by being there in the first place ?
Were they also breaking laws by being armed ,
especially in public ?
Were they legally entitled to own a weapon ?
Or were they just shit stirrers , illegally choosing to incite violence ?
Do not just use a blanket statement , to hide truth...
Give *EVERY* detail , and I shall check , and counter it...
*THAT* is one of the main problems , with those who
try to subvert truth...they hide the reality under one
sentence of false statement , from some right wing website...
Completely agree BW
Which is hard for someone who supports 2nd amendment rights
We want to rally behind those, who choose to bear arms.
It's clear to me, he was "defending" himself, from those who were set out to do him harm.
BUT, he chose an offensive stance by being there.
The commoradery on display was not on his side, he knew that.
Did they openly attack him?
while he innocently stood there "offering" help through first aid?
If, there were no clashes between opposing groups before the incident, then why would he offer help?
I saw no media reporting opposition, only looting and fires.
He came from Illinois with intent
His intent he claims was to "protect"
I believe he thought he would go give the appearance of Billy Bad Ass.
Or, he was scheduled to be there by those who create this shit storm of opposition for political gain.
He believed as a card carrying militia member he thought he was above the law.
It got out of hand and he defended himself
He is supposed to be a learned marksman
then why did he shoot to kill the first victim