I disagree both sides should be heard. One thing we know from science is we constantly get things wrong. What you are calling for is totalitarianism
Wow, way to paint what I said as something completely different. I did not suggest anyone get censored, only that there is a side worth listening to and a side that is not.
Also, I prefer to consult actual experts on subjects than random lamp-post posters. It seems you are arguing that we should get our news from the people who are most loudly questioning the dominant paradigm. That can apply to some things, but not all. That is the issue I take with what you are saying. Skepticism is good, but as a catch-all, it has some serious failings.