Chat bot generated poems and critique
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
Anonymous
<< post removed >>
crimsin
Unveiling
Forum Posts: 2649
Unveiling
Tyrant of Words
124
Joined 25th Jan 2011 Forum Posts: 2649
I liked the AI generated critiques or reviews as they were thorough and cordial...
lepperochan
Craic-Dealer
Forum Posts: 14564
Craic-Dealer
Guardian of Shadows
67
Joined 1st Apr 2011Forum Posts: 14564
Ladies, gentlemen and derivatives of
we're a very patient bunch of mods, so have elected to reiterate:
If you have posted AI generated poetry onto your catalogue take it down.
if you have posted AI generated poetry onto a competition take it down.
we feel there has been a period of grace allowed for people to adjust back to writing their own poetry. so , be warned -there will be no more warnings-
thank you, you are all beautiful people
we're a very patient bunch of mods, so have elected to reiterate:
If you have posted AI generated poetry onto your catalogue take it down.
if you have posted AI generated poetry onto a competition take it down.
we feel there has been a period of grace allowed for people to adjust back to writing their own poetry. so , be warned -there will be no more warnings-
thank you, you are all beautiful people
Josh
Joshua Bond
Forum Posts: 1819
Joshua Bond
Tyrant of Words
41
Joined 2nd Feb 2017Forum Posts: 1819
lepperochan said:Ladies, gentlemen and derivatives of
we're a very patient bunch of mods, so have elected to reiterate:
If you have posted AI generated poetry onto your catalogue take it down.
if you have posted AI generated poetry onto a competition take it down.
we feel there has been a period of grace allowed for people to adjust back to writing their own poetry. so , be warned -there will be no more warnings-
thank you, you are all beautiful people
Thank you for that ...
... but since the gods of tech-world consider us humans as no more than 'meat-machines', is not even human-generated poetry slightly contaminated with AI?
... which brings me to what I consider to be the key question of our times:
What does it mean to be human that technology might somehow deprive me of?
we're a very patient bunch of mods, so have elected to reiterate:
If you have posted AI generated poetry onto your catalogue take it down.
if you have posted AI generated poetry onto a competition take it down.
we feel there has been a period of grace allowed for people to adjust back to writing their own poetry. so , be warned -there will be no more warnings-
thank you, you are all beautiful people
Thank you for that ...
... but since the gods of tech-world consider us humans as no more than 'meat-machines', is not even human-generated poetry slightly contaminated with AI?
... which brings me to what I consider to be the key question of our times:
What does it mean to be human that technology might somehow deprive me of?
MadameLavender
Forum Posts: 5709
Guardian of Shadows
90
Joined 17th Feb 2013Forum Posts: 5709
Just adding in my two cents: posting AI generated poems in comps and your poems pages, is technically plagiarism. By putting your name to it as author is saying that you wrote it, when in fact, a computer program did, so it's actually stealing from a computer that some other human, programmed .
Josh
Joshua Bond
Forum Posts: 1819
Joshua Bond
Tyrant of Words
41
Joined 2nd Feb 2017Forum Posts: 1819
MadameLavender said:Just adding in my two cents: posting AI generated poems in comps and your poems pages, is technically plagiarism. By putting your name to it as author is saying that you wrote it, when in fact, a computer program did, so it's actually stealing from a computer that some other human, programmed .
And it's not only stealing from a computer (anthropomorphising machines notwithstanding), but also stealing from all the human sources that the computer-bot stole from in order to generate the AI poem in the first place.
And it's not only stealing from a computer (anthropomorphising machines notwithstanding), but also stealing from all the human sources that the computer-bot stole from in order to generate the AI poem in the first place.
Ahavati
Tams
Forum Posts: 16670
Tams
Tyrant of Words
122
Joined 11th Apr 2015Forum Posts: 16670
Speaking of AI - this is an excerpt I posted in the Gathering Place this week that some of you may find interesting.
According to humanistic astrologer Alan Clay, "When a new solar system body is discovered, clues to the astrological meaning can be found by looking at a range of factors. But primarily, meaning comes from studying the planet in a large number of charts to find common themes. Here I'm going to present an overview of my research into the new outer-most planet in our solar system which I conducted for my new book Sedna Consciousness. Along the way we'll discover the evolutionary power of the "candidate dwarf planet" and learn of the profound implications for society as Sedna approaches her closest point to Earth later this century in the 2070s."
One such discovery that Clay linked to Sedna is the development of neural networks, the foundation of Artificial Intelligence. From the below article:
"Ray Kurzweil is a scientist, inventor and futurist, who made a series of predictions in the 1990s. All his predictions to date have been realised.
"By the 2030s, virtual reality will begin to feel 100% real. We will be able to upload our mind/consciousness by the end of the decade. By the 2040s, non-biological intelligence will be a billion times more capable than biological intelligence. Nanotech foglets (micro-robots – known as 'smart material') will be able to make food out of thin air and create any object in the physical world at a whim. By 2045, we will multiply our intelligence a billion-fold by linking wirelessly from our neocortex to a synthetic neocortex in the cloud." (From a 26 January 2015 article on singularityhub.com by Peter Diamandis.)
Let's see how literal astrology is. . .
According to humanistic astrologer Alan Clay, "When a new solar system body is discovered, clues to the astrological meaning can be found by looking at a range of factors. But primarily, meaning comes from studying the planet in a large number of charts to find common themes. Here I'm going to present an overview of my research into the new outer-most planet in our solar system which I conducted for my new book Sedna Consciousness. Along the way we'll discover the evolutionary power of the "candidate dwarf planet" and learn of the profound implications for society as Sedna approaches her closest point to Earth later this century in the 2070s."
One such discovery that Clay linked to Sedna is the development of neural networks, the foundation of Artificial Intelligence. From the below article:
"Ray Kurzweil is a scientist, inventor and futurist, who made a series of predictions in the 1990s. All his predictions to date have been realised.
"By the 2030s, virtual reality will begin to feel 100% real. We will be able to upload our mind/consciousness by the end of the decade. By the 2040s, non-biological intelligence will be a billion times more capable than biological intelligence. Nanotech foglets (micro-robots – known as 'smart material') will be able to make food out of thin air and create any object in the physical world at a whim. By 2045, we will multiply our intelligence a billion-fold by linking wirelessly from our neocortex to a synthetic neocortex in the cloud." (From a 26 January 2015 article on singularityhub.com by Peter Diamandis.)
Let's see how literal astrology is. . .
Josh
Joshua Bond
Forum Posts: 1819
Joshua Bond
Tyrant of Words
41
Joined 2nd Feb 2017Forum Posts: 1819
Ahavati said:Speaking of AI - this is an excerpt I posted in the Gathering Place this week that some of you may find interesting.
Let's see how literal astrology is. . .
Ray Kurzweil - the evil transhumanist prophet.
All his "salvation through technology" agenda reminds me of psalm 118, concerning idols and idolatry:
"Those who make them will be like them, and so will all who trust in them." (verse 18)
Let's see how literal astrology is. . .
Ray Kurzweil - the evil transhumanist prophet.
All his "salvation through technology" agenda reminds me of psalm 118, concerning idols and idolatry:
"Those who make them will be like them, and so will all who trust in them." (verse 18)
ajay
Forum Posts: 1945
Dangerous Mind
2
Joined 21st Mar 2023 Forum Posts: 1945
Josh said:
Ray Kurzweil - the evil transhumanist prophet.
All his "salvation through technology" agenda reminds me of psalm 118, concerning idols and idolatry:
"Those who make them will be like them, and so will all who trust in them." (verse 18)
I'm not sure about this anti-technology stance of yours, Josh. Technology is a shovel, a saddle, an abacus, just as much as it is a tractor, a train or a computer. At which point in time would you have liked development to stop? 1345? 1768? 1967? Technology is a good thing. Once upon a time if your crops failed, starvation was the result. Technological development has got rid of that spectre, at least.
Ray Kurzweil - the evil transhumanist prophet.
All his "salvation through technology" agenda reminds me of psalm 118, concerning idols and idolatry:
"Those who make them will be like them, and so will all who trust in them." (verse 18)
I'm not sure about this anti-technology stance of yours, Josh. Technology is a shovel, a saddle, an abacus, just as much as it is a tractor, a train or a computer. At which point in time would you have liked development to stop? 1345? 1768? 1967? Technology is a good thing. Once upon a time if your crops failed, starvation was the result. Technological development has got rid of that spectre, at least.
MadameLavender
Forum Posts: 5709
Guardian of Shadows
90
Joined 17th Feb 2013Forum Posts: 5709
Josh said:
Ray Kurzweil - the evil transhumanist prophet.
All his "salvation through technology" agenda reminds me of psalm 118, concerning idols and idolatry:
"Those who make them will be like them, and so will all who trust in them." (verse 18)
Right up there with Yuval Noah Harari -- another transhumamist false prophet. Here's an excerpt from the link below, that describes his thinking:
https://www.ted.com/speakers/yuval_noah_harari
"Harari's 2011 book, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, explores what made homo sapiens the most successful species on the planet. His answer: We are the only animal that can believe in things that exist purely in our imagination, such as gods, states, money, human rights, corporations and other fictions, and we have developed a unique ability to use these stories to unify and organize groups and ensure cooperation. "
^^so everything is imaginary to him-- God, money, human rights, etc. and believes these "fictions and stories" can "unify, organize, and ensure cooperation "
Basically saying that it's a way to control the masses. Read up on this guy & his views on AI & tech-- all the big name globalists love him because essentially he's pushing their agenda of hooking us all up to technological control . Or "cooperation" a more gentler, lulling term.
Do we really want our brains, wired into the internet cloud and have a handful of people remote controlling our every move? Human rights are imaginary?
Technology is a great thing when used correctly. Replacing our humanity and humanness with it, isn't a good use of it.
Ray Kurzweil - the evil transhumanist prophet.
All his "salvation through technology" agenda reminds me of psalm 118, concerning idols and idolatry:
"Those who make them will be like them, and so will all who trust in them." (verse 18)
Right up there with Yuval Noah Harari -- another transhumamist false prophet. Here's an excerpt from the link below, that describes his thinking:
https://www.ted.com/speakers/yuval_noah_harari
"Harari's 2011 book, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, explores what made homo sapiens the most successful species on the planet. His answer: We are the only animal that can believe in things that exist purely in our imagination, such as gods, states, money, human rights, corporations and other fictions, and we have developed a unique ability to use these stories to unify and organize groups and ensure cooperation. "
^^so everything is imaginary to him-- God, money, human rights, etc. and believes these "fictions and stories" can "unify, organize, and ensure cooperation "
Basically saying that it's a way to control the masses. Read up on this guy & his views on AI & tech-- all the big name globalists love him because essentially he's pushing their agenda of hooking us all up to technological control . Or "cooperation" a more gentler, lulling term.
Do we really want our brains, wired into the internet cloud and have a handful of people remote controlling our every move? Human rights are imaginary?
Technology is a great thing when used correctly. Replacing our humanity and humanness with it, isn't a good use of it.
Ahavati
Tams
Forum Posts: 16670
Tams
Tyrant of Words
122
Joined 11th Apr 2015Forum Posts: 16670
Regardless of how we feel about AI, or those who have predicted how it will be used, the fact remains that it IS rising, and no one knows for sure ( at this point ) how far it will go. But, according to these predictions, we have a pretty good idea. And if they do come to pass ( I'm unsure I'll be here to witness it ), then Sedna, the dark & cold dwarf, in Gemini, the clever & imaginative inventor, will have proven itself ( which was my point ).
Josh
Joshua Bond
Forum Posts: 1819
Joshua Bond
Tyrant of Words
41
Joined 2nd Feb 2017Forum Posts: 1819
ajay said:
I'm not sure about this anti-technology stance of yours, Josh. Technology is a shovel, a saddle, an abacus, just as much as it is a tractor, a train or a computer. At which point in time would you have liked development to stop? 1345? 1768? 1967? Technology is a good thing. Once upon a time if your crops failed, starvation was the result. Technological development has got rid of that spectre, at least.
Hi Ajay,
Thank you for the question, and for promoting some further contemplation concerning Technology.
Here are some of my initial thoughts in response.
1). Technology (like money, religions, weapons) is a form of power. As with all forms of power, they accrue to those already in power which they then use to cement their position.
Remember how the internet was hailed as the great democratising power-to-the-people technology - and what has it become in 20 years? A means of global surveillance and the basis Technofeudalism (Yanis Varoufakis's latest book).
2). You list a number of artefacts as being ‘Technology’. This is true in the physical form of tools but it is only one aspect Technology.
Technology, more essentially, is a carrier of values. It carries a way of thinking, the mindset of those who develop them. A hammer, by design, says “give me something to hit”, enframing and objectifying the world as ‘hittable’. IE: technology is not neutral.
The ‘way of thinking’ for the last 500 years is to “subdue nature and make her our slave” (Francis Bacon, 1521-1626), and more recently to have Nature “on tap” and as “standing reserve” (Martin Heidegger’s (1889-1976) “Bestand”).
Since humans are part of Nature, it is not surprising “on tap” technological thinking has resulted in things like the gig economy - as well as social-media companies getting free work input (information), and then renting it back.
3). Technology’s much vaunted ‘neutrality’ (“guns don’t kill, people do”, implying we have to control the humans, not the technologies) is also falsely derived from Science’s much vaunted ‘neutral’ activity as the open and honest objective exploration of ‘how Nature works’.
Apart from the fact there is no such thing as ‘objectivity’ (see Sociology of Science, eg: Steve Woolgar’s “Science: the Very Idea”), Science is considered ontologically prior to Technology (as in Technology = ‘merely’ Applied Science), meaning that all the fundamental philosophical questions about technology are claimed to be answered by the Philosophy of Science — and it is this that gives rise to both thinking that Technology = Neutral, and which then leads towards the widespread belief in, and worship of, The Technology Fix (eg: geo-engineering to fix global-warming).
Science as practiced is not an ‘objective search for truth’ — it is a religion with its high priests and its heretics and its power-games — and all further distorted by the agendas of those who fund it (biggest funder is the military, by courtesy of governments).
4). The above three points are all situated in the longer-running ideology of Technology=Progress. Partly this arises from not distinguishing between technical progress (which there certainly has been) and technological progress (a mixed bag, where technology meets society).
Those who believe humans are at the cutting edge of history’s Technology Development have not seriously considered how some temples, thousands of years old, were built.
As with all ideologies, Technology=Progress sounds good, has an element of truth, and is therefore hard to pin down and refute.
And partly the idea of progress, and especially progress through technology, has religious roots in eschatological thinking and the ‘God given task’ to bring about a ‘new earth’ with a 1000 years of peace (I need to look up what American evangelical christians and their Republican spokespeople are saying, to confirm this statement).
5). What makes humans human is to be able to say “no” (or “yes”) with equal ease and legitimacy. If we never say “no” to certain technologies (or are simply unable to say ‘no’ because there is no viable alternative), we will be left with “what technology can do, it must do” — and narrative-makers abound to support that mantra as the way of the future (eg: Yuval Noah Harari. Ray Kurzweil). Given the global lurch towards authoritarianism, you can easily imagine where what-technology-can-do-it-must-do is going to take us.
It is increasingly difficult to live out of the technological-system, so to speak; digital-only money will hugely close the net further, reducing genuine choice regarding the right to self-determination, the right to privacy, and more besides.
6). I confess to being a latter-day Luddite. I don’t have a smart-phone, just a 20-year old Nokia, which I don’t generally carry around with me; I don’t want to be interrupted when I’m working. I don’t do social media except DUP. I look at emails once a day, max. I use (paper) maps when travelling. The uncritical acceptance of new-gadget-Technologies (“ … oh I suppose it’s progress…”) can degrade human interaction, and cognitive development.
I confess too to having worked as an engineer, then academic (Philosophy of Technology, Professional & Engineering Ethics), then inventor-designer-maker of hand-weaving tools, then attempting to live off the land in Portugal (failed), and now in my retirement consider myself a sculptor, and builder of temples where Technology and Nature become one. This journey with technology has been driven by one life-long question:
What does it mean to be human that Technology might somehow deprive me of?
7). Amongst being other things (eg: Homo Sapiens, Homo Ludens, Homo Orans) we are also Homo Faber (Man, the animal who makes things). But what’s this gift really for?
I recommend two recent books, both by James Bridle.
(i).Ways of Being — Animals, Plants, Machines: The Search for Planetary Intelligence (Penguin Books, 2023).
(ii).New Dark Age: Technology and the End of the Future (Verso Press, new edition 2023).
(I’d love to recommend my own book on technology too, but I haven’t written it yet) … but you’ll find several ‘technology poems’ on my list
Cheers,
Josh.
I'm not sure about this anti-technology stance of yours, Josh. Technology is a shovel, a saddle, an abacus, just as much as it is a tractor, a train or a computer. At which point in time would you have liked development to stop? 1345? 1768? 1967? Technology is a good thing. Once upon a time if your crops failed, starvation was the result. Technological development has got rid of that spectre, at least.
Hi Ajay,
Thank you for the question, and for promoting some further contemplation concerning Technology.
Here are some of my initial thoughts in response.
1). Technology (like money, religions, weapons) is a form of power. As with all forms of power, they accrue to those already in power which they then use to cement their position.
Remember how the internet was hailed as the great democratising power-to-the-people technology - and what has it become in 20 years? A means of global surveillance and the basis Technofeudalism (Yanis Varoufakis's latest book).
2). You list a number of artefacts as being ‘Technology’. This is true in the physical form of tools but it is only one aspect Technology.
Technology, more essentially, is a carrier of values. It carries a way of thinking, the mindset of those who develop them. A hammer, by design, says “give me something to hit”, enframing and objectifying the world as ‘hittable’. IE: technology is not neutral.
The ‘way of thinking’ for the last 500 years is to “subdue nature and make her our slave” (Francis Bacon, 1521-1626), and more recently to have Nature “on tap” and as “standing reserve” (Martin Heidegger’s (1889-1976) “Bestand”).
Since humans are part of Nature, it is not surprising “on tap” technological thinking has resulted in things like the gig economy - as well as social-media companies getting free work input (information), and then renting it back.
3). Technology’s much vaunted ‘neutrality’ (“guns don’t kill, people do”, implying we have to control the humans, not the technologies) is also falsely derived from Science’s much vaunted ‘neutral’ activity as the open and honest objective exploration of ‘how Nature works’.
Apart from the fact there is no such thing as ‘objectivity’ (see Sociology of Science, eg: Steve Woolgar’s “Science: the Very Idea”), Science is considered ontologically prior to Technology (as in Technology = ‘merely’ Applied Science), meaning that all the fundamental philosophical questions about technology are claimed to be answered by the Philosophy of Science — and it is this that gives rise to both thinking that Technology = Neutral, and which then leads towards the widespread belief in, and worship of, The Technology Fix (eg: geo-engineering to fix global-warming).
Science as practiced is not an ‘objective search for truth’ — it is a religion with its high priests and its heretics and its power-games — and all further distorted by the agendas of those who fund it (biggest funder is the military, by courtesy of governments).
4). The above three points are all situated in the longer-running ideology of Technology=Progress. Partly this arises from not distinguishing between technical progress (which there certainly has been) and technological progress (a mixed bag, where technology meets society).
Those who believe humans are at the cutting edge of history’s Technology Development have not seriously considered how some temples, thousands of years old, were built.
As with all ideologies, Technology=Progress sounds good, has an element of truth, and is therefore hard to pin down and refute.
And partly the idea of progress, and especially progress through technology, has religious roots in eschatological thinking and the ‘God given task’ to bring about a ‘new earth’ with a 1000 years of peace (I need to look up what American evangelical christians and their Republican spokespeople are saying, to confirm this statement).
5). What makes humans human is to be able to say “no” (or “yes”) with equal ease and legitimacy. If we never say “no” to certain technologies (or are simply unable to say ‘no’ because there is no viable alternative), we will be left with “what technology can do, it must do” — and narrative-makers abound to support that mantra as the way of the future (eg: Yuval Noah Harari. Ray Kurzweil). Given the global lurch towards authoritarianism, you can easily imagine where what-technology-can-do-it-must-do is going to take us.
It is increasingly difficult to live out of the technological-system, so to speak; digital-only money will hugely close the net further, reducing genuine choice regarding the right to self-determination, the right to privacy, and more besides.
6). I confess to being a latter-day Luddite. I don’t have a smart-phone, just a 20-year old Nokia, which I don’t generally carry around with me; I don’t want to be interrupted when I’m working. I don’t do social media except DUP. I look at emails once a day, max. I use (paper) maps when travelling. The uncritical acceptance of new-gadget-Technologies (“ … oh I suppose it’s progress…”) can degrade human interaction, and cognitive development.
I confess too to having worked as an engineer, then academic (Philosophy of Technology, Professional & Engineering Ethics), then inventor-designer-maker of hand-weaving tools, then attempting to live off the land in Portugal (failed), and now in my retirement consider myself a sculptor, and builder of temples where Technology and Nature become one. This journey with technology has been driven by one life-long question:
What does it mean to be human that Technology might somehow deprive me of?
7). Amongst being other things (eg: Homo Sapiens, Homo Ludens, Homo Orans) we are also Homo Faber (Man, the animal who makes things). But what’s this gift really for?
I recommend two recent books, both by James Bridle.
(i).Ways of Being — Animals, Plants, Machines: The Search for Planetary Intelligence (Penguin Books, 2023).
(ii).New Dark Age: Technology and the End of the Future (Verso Press, new edition 2023).
(I’d love to recommend my own book on technology too, but I haven’t written it yet) … but you’ll find several ‘technology poems’ on my list
Cheers,
Josh.
Ahavati
Tams
Forum Posts: 16670
Tams
Tyrant of Words
122
Joined 11th Apr 2015Forum Posts: 16670
Reuters just published this:
OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough ahead of CEO ouster, sources say
https://www.reuters.com/technology/sam-altmans-ouster-openai-was-precipitated-by-letter-board-about-ai-breakthrough-2023-11-22/
Excerpt:
Some at OpenAI believe Q* (pronounced Q-Star) could be a breakthrough in the startup's search for what's known as artificial general intelligence (AGI), one of the people told Reuters. OpenAI defines AGI as autonomous systems that surpass humans in most economically valuable tasks.
From an astrological perspective ( we already have Josh the scientific engineer and Madame the medical maven ). ajay I am unsure what you do!
OpenAI's Q* AI tech is likely a coded reference to the Age of Aquarius: Q is the 17th number of the english alphabet; The Star is the 17th trump in the major arcana of the tarot; and The Star card corresponds to AQuarius in the Golden Dawn tarot correspondence system.
The air element is the defining element of our time; thus, Sedna in Gemini ( Air - The Rise of AI ), and Pluto moving back into Aquarius ( Air ) January 21, 2024. Pluto's transit through Aquarius, on a larger scale, influences the collective consciousness and societal structures. During this time, there may be a focus on transforming and revolutionizing social, political, and technological systems. Issues related to individual freedoms, equality, and the advancement of human rights may gain prominence.
Is it feasible to assume that tech companies are embedding their symbols accordingly. Technology, after all, is a core signification of the air element.
Josh
Joshua Bond
Forum Posts: 1819
Joshua Bond
Tyrant of Words
41
Joined 2nd Feb 2017Forum Posts: 1819
Ahavati said:Reuters just published this:
OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough ahead of CEO ouster, sources say
https://www.reuters.com/technology/sam-altmans-ouster-openai-was-precipitated-by-letter-board-about-ai-breakthrough-2023-11-22/
Excerpt:
From an astrological perspective ( we already have Josh the scientific engineer and Madame the medical maven ). ajay I am unsure what you do!
OpenAI's Q* AI tech is likely a coded reference to the Age of Aquarius: Q is the 17th number of the english alphabet; The Star is the 17th trump in the major arcana of the tarot; and The Star card corresponds to AQuarius in the Golden Dawn tarot correspondence system.
The air element is the defining element of our time; thus, Sedna in Gemini ( Air - The Rise of AI ), and Pluto moving back into Aquarius ( Air ) January 21, 2024. Pluto's transit through Aquarius, on a larger scale, influences the collective consciousness and societal structures. During this time, there may be a focus on transforming and revolutionizing social, political, and technological systems. Issues related to individual freedoms, equality, and the advancement of human rights may gain prominence.
Is it feasible to assume that tech companies are embedding their symbols accordingly. Technology, after all, is a core signification of the air element.
I'm sure Technology (with a big-'T') has developed over the ages in tune with some particular astrological changes and configurations. I know nothing about it, so it's interesting to read something in this field.
Concerning AGI and its future impact, it's hard to predict - as with all technology impacts. Who'd have thought, for example, that a strange idea of a "horseless carriage" (sold to the public as a technological invention to clean up the streets from an abundance of horse-shit, ie: an environmental plus) would spawn mass networks of motorways & garages, plus out-of-town shopping, commuter life-styles, road-rage, wars over oil supplies, a global industry with varying levels of protectionism, wars over manufacturing resources, and of course its own environmental challenges with subsequent political interventions?
For me, the advent of AI all boils down to a simple choice: do we continue to develop our consciousness to connect better with Source (as humans have done over millennia), or do we now just pop an AGI pill expecting it to do the work for us?
OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough ahead of CEO ouster, sources say
https://www.reuters.com/technology/sam-altmans-ouster-openai-was-precipitated-by-letter-board-about-ai-breakthrough-2023-11-22/
Excerpt:
From an astrological perspective ( we already have Josh the scientific engineer and Madame the medical maven ). ajay I am unsure what you do!
OpenAI's Q* AI tech is likely a coded reference to the Age of Aquarius: Q is the 17th number of the english alphabet; The Star is the 17th trump in the major arcana of the tarot; and The Star card corresponds to AQuarius in the Golden Dawn tarot correspondence system.
The air element is the defining element of our time; thus, Sedna in Gemini ( Air - The Rise of AI ), and Pluto moving back into Aquarius ( Air ) January 21, 2024. Pluto's transit through Aquarius, on a larger scale, influences the collective consciousness and societal structures. During this time, there may be a focus on transforming and revolutionizing social, political, and technological systems. Issues related to individual freedoms, equality, and the advancement of human rights may gain prominence.
Is it feasible to assume that tech companies are embedding their symbols accordingly. Technology, after all, is a core signification of the air element.
I'm sure Technology (with a big-'T') has developed over the ages in tune with some particular astrological changes and configurations. I know nothing about it, so it's interesting to read something in this field.
Concerning AGI and its future impact, it's hard to predict - as with all technology impacts. Who'd have thought, for example, that a strange idea of a "horseless carriage" (sold to the public as a technological invention to clean up the streets from an abundance of horse-shit, ie: an environmental plus) would spawn mass networks of motorways & garages, plus out-of-town shopping, commuter life-styles, road-rage, wars over oil supplies, a global industry with varying levels of protectionism, wars over manufacturing resources, and of course its own environmental challenges with subsequent political interventions?
For me, the advent of AI all boils down to a simple choice: do we continue to develop our consciousness to connect better with Source (as humans have done over millennia), or do we now just pop an AGI pill expecting it to do the work for us?