Page:
Advice & critique for a newbie
NorthernRamble
Joined 26th June 2013
Forum Posts: 39
Lost Thinker
Forum Posts: 39
I'm having trouble tweeking this poem. It is missing something, I just can't put my finger on it. Being so new to writing poetry, I figured I would come abeggin to the experts for some advise. So please, take it apart and give me your opinions.
A Single Watcher
He watches
a single eye
glaring balefully
ever watchful
for those in peril.
He fights
a single eye
conflicting
tempest rages
to ward the night.
He waits
a single eye
never falters
patiently navigating
adrifted travellers to sanctuary.
A Single Watcher
He watches
a single eye
glaring balefully
ever watchful
for those in peril.
He fights
a single eye
conflicting
tempest rages
to ward the night.
He waits
a single eye
never falters
patiently navigating
adrifted travellers to sanctuary.
Anonymous
Ok, sorry to copy and paste, but this is what I would do:
He watches (1)
a single eye
glaring; (2)
ever watchful
for those in peril
He fights
a single eye
darting-
his tempest raging (3)
into the night
He waits
a single eye
never faltering,
patiently navigating
travellers to sanctuary. (4)
(1) opening line of each stanza separated to drive home a message.
(2) balefully is too fussy.
(3) conflicting tempest rages doesn't work. 'His' also refers back to the watcher as a person.
(4) taken out adrifted, makes no sense. Also helps flow.
Taking out the full stop after every stanza also helps tell this is a continual story, rather than three separate thoughts.
All of this is just my own honest opinion however, and you don't have to listen to any of it.
He watches (1)
a single eye
glaring; (2)
ever watchful
for those in peril
He fights
a single eye
darting-
his tempest raging (3)
into the night
He waits
a single eye
never faltering,
patiently navigating
travellers to sanctuary. (4)
(1) opening line of each stanza separated to drive home a message.
(2) balefully is too fussy.
(3) conflicting tempest rages doesn't work. 'His' also refers back to the watcher as a person.
(4) taken out adrifted, makes no sense. Also helps flow.
Taking out the full stop after every stanza also helps tell this is a continual story, rather than three separate thoughts.
All of this is just my own honest opinion however, and you don't have to listen to any of it.
NorthernRamble
Joined 26th June 2013
Forum Posts: 39
Lost Thinker
Forum Posts: 39
Thank you Missy for taking the time to advise me Now I'm going to pick your brain... The poem is actually about a lighthouse not a person. So, I wonder if I should use it instead of he? Since adrifted makes no sense should it be lost? or just left out like you put? The 2nd stanza is all about fighting the raging storm to bring that beacon of hope. Hence, conflicting tempest rages.
Anonymous
You have already personified the lighthouse by saying he watches/he waits/he fights, so the he is then appropriate. Adrift is a word... I'm not sure adrifted is actually a word. I'd lose it anyway if I were you.
Third stanza - been as it's about a lighthouse, maybe this would
be appropriate -
a single eye
darting
through tempests raging
into the lost night
Third stanza - been as it's about a lighthouse, maybe this would
be appropriate -
a single eye
darting
through tempests raging
into the lost night
NorthernRamble
Joined 26th June 2013
Forum Posts: 39
Lost Thinker
Forum Posts: 39
Alright thanx so much for your help, it's very appreciated.
A Single Watcher
He watches
a single eye
glaring;
ever watchful
for those in peril.
He fights
a single eye
darting-
through tempest raging
into the lost night.
He waits
a single eye
never faltering,
patiently navigating
travellers to sanctuary.
A Single Watcher
He watches
a single eye
glaring;
ever watchful
for those in peril.
He fights
a single eye
darting-
through tempest raging
into the lost night.
He waits
a single eye
never faltering,
patiently navigating
travellers to sanctuary.
Anonymous
'Through tempest raging' - doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
NorthernRamble
Joined 26th June 2013
Forum Posts: 39
Lost Thinker
Forum Posts: 39
LOl opps forgot an "s"...I'm on hr 15 of a 16 hr shift and my brain is a bit foggy. I'll fix it :)
Astyanax
Ceejay
Forum Posts: 748
Ceejay
Fire of Insight
9
Joined 23rd Feb 2010Forum Posts: 748
Missy's idea of separating the opening verb in each verse is very effective.
Further suggestions:
Why not call it 'The Lighthouse'. The personification works okay.
V.2 - why not 'through raging tempest'?
V.3 - 'adrift' is a nice word - it would be a shame to lose the idea. Why not 'travellers adrift to sanctuary'?
Further suggestions:
Why not call it 'The Lighthouse'. The personification works okay.
V.2 - why not 'through raging tempest'?
V.3 - 'adrift' is a nice word - it would be a shame to lose the idea. Why not 'travellers adrift to sanctuary'?
redrose
Ambur
Forum Posts: 303
Ambur
Thought Provoker
2
Joined 10th Apr 2013Forum Posts: 303
Well id that was your first poem you have ever wrote. Good job to you. It want bad. When you write you should try and get the people reading it to know and feel how you felt when you wrote it.
Kexby
john rickell
Joined 16th Nov 2011
Forum Posts: 115
john rickell
Dangerous Mind
Forum Posts: 115
Try 'raging' and rewrite the last two lines they do not scan do they?
Read it outloud to yourself
EngrVV
D_Poetic Engineer
Forum Posts: 2483
D_Poetic Engineer
Dangerous Mind
40
Joined 11th Sep 2012 Forum Posts: 2483
Through raging tempest (makes more sense)...
darting through raging tempest (the light is darting through the raging storm)
If you say, darting through tempest raging ( you describe the light as darting and raging through the tempest)
darting through raging tempest (the light is darting through the raging storm)
If you say, darting through tempest raging ( you describe the light as darting and raging through the tempest)
Mz_Fallen_Angel
Joined 19th Apr 2014
Forum Posts: 11
Lost Thinker
Forum Posts: 11
I think you should change the title to something more.....related to the poem. It also sounds rushed. Let it flow from your heart. Other than that I love it!!